Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
PLoS One
2009 Sep 15;49:e7032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007032.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Characterization of an enantioselective odorant receptor in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.
Bohbot JD
,
Dickens JC
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Enantiomers differ only in the left or right handedness (chirality) of their orientations and exhibit identical chemical and physical properties. In chemical communication systems, enantiomers can be differentially active at the physiological and behavioral levels. Only recently were enantioselective odorant receptors demonstrated in mammals while their existence in insects has remained hypothetical. Using the two-microelectrode voltage clamp of Xenopus oocytes, we show that the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, odorant receptor 8 (AaOR8) acts as a chiral selective receptor for the (R)-(-)-enantiomer of 1-octen-3-ol, which in the presence of other kairomones is an attractant used by blood-sucking insects to locate their hosts. In addition to steric constraints, chain length and degree of unsaturation play important roles in this recognition process. This is the first characterization of an enantioselective odorant receptor in insects and the results demonstrate that an OR alone, without helper proteins, can account for chiral specificity exhibited by olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs).
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
19753115
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC2737144 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One
Figure 1. AaOR8 discriminates between the two enantiomers of 1-octen-3-ol.(A) The odorant 1-octen-3-ol occurs in two configurations: (R) and (S). Asterisk indicates the chiral center. (B) Response traces of AaOR8 to each enantiomer are recorded in nano-ampere (nA). For space considerations, time scales differ. (C) Concentration-response plots of AaOR8 to each enantiomer of 1-octen-3-ol (nâ=â6). Odorant concentrations were plotted on a logarithmic scale. Each point represents the mean and vertical current response; error bars are s.e.m. Responses to 10â5 M 1-octen-3-ol are highlighted in red.
Figure 2. Strong preference of AaOR8 towards (R)-(â)-1-octen-3-ol.The concentration-response plot for (R)-(â)-1-octen-3-ol was repeated in each panel for comparative purposes. (A) Importance of C3 as a chiral center. Concentration-response plots of AaOR8 to 1-octen-3-one (nâ=â6). (B) Shifting the chiral center from C3 to C4 reduces AaOR8 sensitivity. Concentration-response plots of AaOR8 to 1-octen-4-ol (nâ=â8). (C) Side chain length affects AaOR8 sensitivity. Concentration-response plots of AaOR8 to 1-nonen-3-ol and 1-hepten-3-ol (nâ=â8 to 9). (D) The double bond is critical for recognition by AaOR8. Concentration-response plots of AaOR8 to 3-octanol (nâ=â6). (E) EC50 ranking profile of AaOR8 for octenol related compounds. Asterisk, p<0.05; two asterisks, p<0.01 and three asterisks, p<0.001. Odorant concentrations were plotted on a logarithmic scale. Each point represents the mean and error bars indicate s.e.m.
Figure 3. Relative activity of AaOR8 towards (R)-(â)-1-octen-3-ol and related compounds.Changes relative to (R)-(â)-1-octen-3-ol are shaded in grey. Presence and absence of a specific chemical feature are indicated by + and -, respectively. The formula of racemic compounds does not assume the 3 dimensional orientation of the residues attached to the chiral center. Note that the least active isomers are those lacking the proper chirality at the 3-position (C3*). Relative activities of each odorant (EC50s) are reflected by area of solid circles.
Benton,
Variant ionotropic glutamate receptors as chemosensory receptors in Drosophila.
2009, Pubmed
Benton,
Variant ionotropic glutamate receptors as chemosensory receptors in Drosophila.
2009,
Pubmed
Benton,
Atypical membrane topology and heteromeric function of Drosophila odorant receptors in vivo.
2006,
Pubmed
Bierl,
Potent sex attractant of the gypsy moth: its isolation, identification, and synthesis.
1970,
Pubmed
Bohbot,
Molecular characterization of the Aedes aegypti odorant receptor gene family.
2007,
Pubmed
Cork,
Identification of electrophysiologically-active compounds for the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, in human sweat extracts.
1996,
Pubmed
Gong,
Ligand-interaction kinetics of the pheromone- binding protein from the gypsy moth, L. dispar: insights into the mechanism of binding and release.
2009,
Pubmed
Grant,
Electrophysiological responses of receptor neurons in mosquito maxillary palp sensilla to carbon dioxide.
1995,
Pubmed
Greenwood,
Chemical communication: chirality in elephant pheromones.
2005,
Pubmed
Grosse-Wilde,
Candidate pheromone receptors provide the basis for the response of distinct antennal neurons to pheromonal compounds.
2007,
Pubmed
Hallem,
The molecular basis of odor coding in the Drosophila antenna.
2004,
Pubmed
Hallem,
Olfaction: mosquito receptor for human-sweat odorant.
2004,
Pubmed
Hallem,
Coding of odors by a receptor repertoire.
2006,
Pubmed
Hill,
G protein-coupled receptors in Anopheles gambiae.
2002,
Pubmed
Jones,
Functional conservation of an insect odorant receptor gene across 250 million years of evolution.
2005,
Pubmed
Kline,
Evaluation of the enantiomers of 1-octen-3-ol and 1-octyn-3-ol as attractants for mosquitoes associated with a freshwater swamp in Florida, U.S.A.
2007,
Pubmed
Krieger,
Genes encoding candidate pheromone receptors in a moth (Heliothis virescens).
2004,
Pubmed
Krzywinski,
Toward understanding Anophelinae (Diptera, Culicidae) phylogeny: insights from nuclear single-copy genes and the weight of evidence.
2001,
Pubmed
Lartigue,
The crystal structure of a cockroach pheromone-binding protein suggests a new ligand binding and release mechanism.
2003,
Pubmed
Laska,
Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for a large array of enantiomers.
2007,
Pubmed
Laska,
Enantioselectivity of odor perception in squirrel monkeys and humans.
1999,
Pubmed
Laska,
Enantioselectivity of odor perception in honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica).
2001,
Pubmed
Laughlin,
Activation of pheromone-sensitive neurons is mediated by conformational activation of pheromone-binding protein.
2008,
Pubmed
Leal,
Chemical communication in scarab beetles: reciprocal behavioral agonist-antagonist activities of chiral pheromones.
1996,
Pubmed
Liberles,
A second class of chemosensory receptors in the olfactory epithelium.
2006,
Pubmed
Lu,
Odor coding in the maxillary palp of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae.
2007,
Pubmed
Melo,
Identification of a chemosensory receptor from the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti, that is highly conserved and expressed in olfactory and gustatory organs.
2004,
Pubmed
Nakagawa,
Insect sex-pheromone signals mediated by specific combinations of olfactory receptors.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Neuhaus,
Odorant receptor heterodimerization in the olfactory system of Drosophila melanogaster.
2005,
Pubmed
Pitts,
A highly conserved candidate chemoreceptor expressed in both olfactory and gustatory tissues in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.
2004,
Pubmed
Plettner,
Discrimination of pheromone enantiomers by two pheromone binding proteins from the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar.
2000,
Pubmed
Pophof,
Pheromone-binding proteins contribute to the activation of olfactory receptor neurons in the silkmoths antheraea polyphemus and Bombyx mori.
2004,
Pubmed
Reisenman,
Enantioselectivity of projection neurons innervating identified olfactory glomeruli.
2004,
Pubmed
Robertson,
The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family.
2006,
Pubmed
Saito,
Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire.
2009,
Pubmed
Sato,
Insect olfactory receptors are heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Scott,
Direct induction of autophagy by Atg1 inhibits cell growth and induces apoptotic cell death.
2007,
Pubmed
Sumikawa,
Active multi-subunit ACh receptor assembled by translation of heterologous mRNA in Xenopus oocytes.
1981,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Syed,
Maxillary palps are broad spectrum odorant detectors in Culex quinquefasciatus.
2007,
Pubmed
Syed,
Pheromone reception in fruit flies expressing a moth's odorant receptor.
2006,
Pubmed
Tanaka,
Highly selective tuning of a silkworm olfactory receptor to a key mulberry leaf volatile.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tumlinson,
Identification of the female Japanese beetle sex pheromone: inhibition of male response by an enantiomer.
1977,
Pubmed
Turin,
A spectroscopic mechanism for primary olfactory reception.
1996,
Pubmed
Vogt,
Expression of pheromone binding proteins during antennal development in the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar.
1989,
Pubmed
Vosshall,
An olfactory sensory map in the fly brain.
2000,
Pubmed
Wanner,
A honey bee odorant receptor for the queen substance 9-oxo-2-decenoic acid.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wicher,
Drosophila odorant receptors are both ligand-gated and cyclic-nucleotide-activated cation channels.
2008,
Pubmed
Wojtasek,
Attracted or repelled?--a matter of two neurons, one pheromone binding protein, and a chiral center.
1998,
Pubmed
Xia,
Identification and characterization of an odorant receptor from the West Nile virus mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus.
2006,
Pubmed
Zhang,
Semiochemistry of the goldeneyed lacewing Chrysopa oculata: attraction of males to a male-produced pheromone.
2004,
Pubmed
