Griffin JN et al. (2018), RAPGEF5 Regulates Nuclear Translocation of β-Ca...

XB-ART-54411

Dev Cell 2018 Jan 22;442:248-260.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.12.001.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

RAPGEF5 Regulates Nuclear Translocation of β-Catenin.

Griffin JN , Del Viso F , Duncan AR , Robson A , Hwang W , Kulkarni S , Khokha MK .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Canonical Wnt signaling coordinates many critical aspects of embryonic development, while dysregulated Wnt signaling contributes to common diseases, including congenital malformations and cancer. The nuclear localization of β-catenin is the defining step in pathway activation. However, despite intensive investigation, the mechanisms regulating β-catenin nuclear transport remain undefined. In a patient with congenital heart disease and heterotaxy, a disorder of left-right patterning, we previously identified the guanine nucleotide exchange factor, RAPGEF5. Here, we demonstrate that RAPGEF5 regulates left-right patterning via Wnt signaling. In particular, RAPGEF5 regulates the nuclear translocation of β-catenin independently of both β-catenin cytoplasmic stabilization and the importin β1/Ran-mediated transport system. We propose a model whereby RAPGEF5 activates the nuclear GTPases, Rap1a/b, to facilitate the nuclear transport of β-catenin, defining a parallel nuclear transport pathway to Ran. Our results suggest new targets for modulating Wnt signaling in disease states.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 29290587
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC5818985
???displayArticle.link??? Dev Cell
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

Species referenced: Xenopus
Genes referenced: cep43 chrd ctnnb1 dand5 fgf8 foxj1 foxj1.2 gdf3 gsc gsk3b lrp1 nodal nodal1 nodal3.1 nog not otx2 pitx2 ralgds ran rap1a rap1b rap2a rap2b rapgef5 rpe ventx1
???displayArticle.antibodies??? Ctnnb1 Ab1 Ctnnb1 Ab2 H3f3a Ab33 Rap1a Ab1 Rap2a Ab1 Rapgef5 Ab1
???displayArticle.morpholinos??? rapgef5 MO1 rapgef5 MO2

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

	Graphical Abstract
	Figure 1. Rapgef5 Depletion Disrupts LR Development (A) Percentage of Rapgef5 depleted embryos with abnormal cardiac looping (A or L loops). (B) Pitx2c is expressed in the left lateral mesoderm of stage 28 control Xenopus embryos (red arrow, lateral view anterior to the left), but is abnormally, typically bilaterally, expressed following MO- or CRISPR-mediated depletion of Rapgef5. Co-injection of human RAPGEF5 mRNA can rescue pitx2c in Rapgef5 morphants. (C) coco expression in the LRO of control and Rapgef5-depleted embryos at stages 16 and 19. Ventral view with anterior to the top. Graphs depict the percentage of embryos displaying abnormal coco expression. Note the reduced expression in rapgef5 morphants at both stages. (D) xnr1 and gdf3 expression is reduced in the LRO of rapgef5 morphants at stage 16, prior to the onset of cilia-driven flow. Ventral views with anterior to the top. âˆ—p < 0.05, âˆ—âˆ—p < 0.01, and âˆ—âˆ—âˆ—p < 0.005. See also Figures S1 and S2.
	Figure 2. Depletion of Rapgef5 Impairs Canonical Wnt Signaling (A) Depletion of Rapgef5 using MOs or CRISPR impairs foxj1 and xnr3 expression in the dorsal blastopore lip of stage 10 embryos. (B) Simplified schematic of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Left side: in the absence of Wnt ligand, a destruction complex containing Axin and Gsk3 phosphorylates Î²-catenin, which marks it for cytoplasmic destruction. Right side: once the pathway is activated by Wnt ligand binding to Frizzled and Lrp receptors, phosphorylation of Î²-catenin by GSK3 is inhibited allowing Î²-catenin to accumulate in the cytoplasm and translocate into the nucleus to initiate transcription of Wnt target genes. (C and D) Levels of total and active Î²-catenin protein are essentially unchanged in Rapgef5-depleted embryos at stage 9 as assayed by western blot. However, both forms of Î²-catenin are reduced at stages 10 and 12. Note that levels of active Î²-catenin are much more severely affected. Conversely, overexpression of human RAPGEF5 mRNA results in a mild increase in total Î²-catenin levels and a more pronounced increase in active Î²-catenin levels. âˆ—p < 0.05, âˆ—âˆ—âˆ—p < 0.005. See also Figure S3.
	Figure 3. Rapgef5 Acts Downstream of Î²-Catenin Cytoplasmic Stabilization (A) The ability to induce secondary axes in development can be used as a readout of Wnt signaling activity. Uninjected embryos have a single axis (dotted green line), while embryos injected with Î²-catenin mRNA can have a second embryonic axis (two dotted red lines), which are readily detected in stages 16â€“19 embryos. Injection of WT, ST, or NLS-tagged Î²-catenin can induce secondary axes. Rapgef5 depletion significantly decreases the percentage of secondary axes induced by WT and ST Î²-catenin. Injection of GSK3 mRNA reduces secondary axes induced by WT Î²-catenin but has no effect on ST Î²-catenin. The ability of NLS-Î²-catenin to induce secondary axes is unaffected by reduction of Rapgef5 levels. (B) Rapgef5 knockdown reduces luciferase activity in embryos injected with WT or ST Î²-catenin mRNA in a TOPFlash assay. Data are represented as mean Â± SD. (C) Wnt signaling activity is reduced in ST Î²-catenin murine embryonic fibroblasts (Î´exon3) following siRNA depletion of Rapgef5. The schematic depicts the Catnblox(ex3) mouse allele. Exon 3 (E3), containing the GSK3 phosphorylation sites that target Î²-catenin for cytoplasmic degradation, is flanked by loxP sites allowing for its conditional removal and production of a ST Î²-catenin allele. WT, WT cells; Fop, ST Î²-catenin cells transfected with FOPFlash-negative control; Top, ST Î²-catenin cells transfected with TOPFlash reporter plasmid; Top + R5 siRNA, ST Î²-catenin cells transfected with Rapgef5 siRNA and TOPFlash reporter plasmid; Top + C siRNA, ST Î²-catenin cells transfected with control siRNA and TOPFlash reporter plasmid. A Renilla luciferase transfection control was included in each treatment to allow normalization. Data are represented as mean Â± SEM. (D) Pharmacological inhibition of GSK3 by the addition of BIO between stages 9 and 11 results in increased Î²-catenin signaling and loss of anterior development in Xenopus embryos. Depletion of Rapgef5 can counteract this effect and rescue development of the head, demonstrating that Rapgef5 regulates Wnt signaling downstream of GSK3. âˆ—p < 0.05, âˆ—âˆ—âˆ—p < 0.005.
	Figure 4. Rapgef5 Is Required for the Nuclear Localization of Î²-Catenin (A and B) GFP-tagged WT and ST Î²-catenin localize to the plasma membrane and nucleus in the dorsal blastopore lip of stage 10 control embryos but this nuclear localization is lost in rapgef5 morphants (note loss of nuclear GFP signal in merged images). (C) NLS Î²-catenin-GFP localizes normally into nuclei even in the absence of Rapgef5. Graphs in the center panel represent the ratio of nuclear-localized GFP relative to nuclear-localized NLS-cherry control. Controls were normalized to ease comparison. The graphs on the right display ratiometric analysis of nuclear versus cytoplasmic GFP (Î²-catenin) and NLS-mCherry levels. Nuclear-localized Î²-catenin is reduced in Rapgef5 morphants relative to controls for WT and ST Î²-catenin, but not NLS-Î²-catenin. Localization of NLS-mCherry is unaltered. All data represented as mean Â± SE. âˆ—âˆ—p < 0.01, âˆ—âˆ—âˆ—p < 0.005.
	Figure 5. NLS Î²-Catenin Rescues foxj1 Transcription and LR Patterning Defects in Rapgef5 Morphants Depletion of Rapgef5 reduces the expression of the Wnt responsive gene foxj1 and alters LR patterning (pitx2c). Red arrow indicates an example of normal pitx2c expression on the left side of the embryo. Co-injection of 50 pg of NLS-Î²-catenin mRNA significantly rescues (A) expression of foxj1 at stage 10 and (B) pitx2c expression in Rapgef5 depleted embryos. âˆ—p < 0.05, âˆ—âˆ—p < 0.01.
	Figure 6. Depletion of Rapgef5 Impairs Nuclear Translocation of Endogenous Î²-Catenin (A) Nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation reveals that levels of endogenous Î²-catenin are reduced in the nuclei of Rapgef5 morphants, while cytoplasmic levels are essentially normal. (B) BIO treatment does not rescue the nuclear localization of endogenous Î²-catenin. (C) Quantification of average Î²-catenin levels in nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of control and morphant embryos with or without BIO treatment (error bars represent SEM). All nuclear treatments (black bars) are relativized to the BIO-untreated nuclear control, and all cytoplasmic treatments (gray bars) are relativized to the BIO-untreated cytoplasmic control. Note the reduction of nuclear-localized Î²-catenin in Rapgef5-depleted embryos with or without BIO treatment. The BIO-treated rapgef5 morphants have less nuclear-localized Î²-catenin than BIO-untreated controls (UCs), despite having higher levels of cytoplasmic Î²-catenin. The cellular compartment markers (H3 for nuclear fraction and Î²-actin for cytoplasmic fraction) displayed in (A and B) are overexposed to demonstrate the degree of purification. For quantitation of Î²-catenin (C), shorter exposures of the gel (unsaturated) were used in which these markers serve to normalize the amount of protein loaded for each compartment. âp < 0.05, ââp < 0.01.
	Figure 7. Active Raps and Î²-Catenin Interact (A) The GFP-RBDRalGDS active Rap sensor reveals the presence of active Raps in the nucleus and plasma membrane of dorsal blastopore lip cells at stage 10. (B) Rap1 protein co-immunoprecipitates with Î²-catenin. IP, immunoprecipitate. (C) Pull-down of active Rap proteins from stage 10 Xenopus embryos using the RalGDS sensor. Î²-Catenin co-immunoprecipitates with active Raps demonstrating an interaction. (D) Injection of CA Rap1b mRNA can partially rescue loss of foxj1 expression in rapgef5 morphants, while DN Rap1b mRNA does not. âˆ—âˆ—âˆ—p < 0.0001. See also Figure S7.
	Figure S1. Related to Fig. 1; Depletion of Rapgef5. (A) Knockdown of Rapgef5 disrupts cardiac looping. Ventral views of Xenopus tadpoles with anterior to the top. Representative examples of a normal (D-loop outlined in blue lower panel), and abnormal (A-Loop outlined in green, L-Loop outlined in red) looped heart. Injection of a control MO or a control CRISPR (targeting tyrosinase) does not affect cardiac looping. (B) Injection of a control MO or control CRISPR (targeting tyrosinase) does not cause abnormalities in pitx2c expression. (C) The control (tyrosinase) CRISPR reduces pigment levels in stage 45 Xenopus embryos, demonstrating that the CRISPR/CAS9 system functions as expected. (D) Rationale of R5 MOSplice design. The splice MO targets the splice donor site at the start of intron 2. Failure to excise intron 2 results in a premature stop codon early in the Rapgef5 protein. RT-PCR confirms that R5 MOSplice causes retention of intron 2. In genomic DNA, intron 2 spanning primers amplify a band of 547bp. In WT cDNA, these primers amplify a band of 157bp. PCR primers amplifying cDNA from R5 MOSplice morphants generate a band at 547bp indicating retention of intron 2 in mRNA. A â€œno templateâ€ negative control is also included. A single asterisk indicates P<0.05 and a triple asterisk P<0.005.
	Figure S2. Related to Fig. 1; Depletion of Rapgef5 protein. (A) Western blot demonstrating the efficacy of the R5 MOATG, R5 MOSplice, and CRISPR mediated Rapgef5 depletion in stage 10 Xenopus embryos. Overexpression of human RAPGEF5 mRNA increases protein levels. (B) Timeline of Rapgef5 depletion. Rapgef5 protein levels were unaltered in morphants at late blastula stages (st 8 and 9) but reduced at stage 10 and 12. The graph represents fold changes in Rapgef5 protein levels in control and depleted embryos relative to the stage 8 uninjected controls.
	Figure S3. Related to Fig. 2; Expression of gastrulation genes in rapgef5 morphants. (A) At stage 10, expression of numerous gastrulation markers (gsc, chordin, fgf8, otx2, vent, t, not and noggin) are less affected by depletion of Rapgef5 compared to foxj1 or xnr3 (See Fig. 2A). Vegetal views with dorsal to the top. (B) Injection of a control MO or a control CRISPR (targeting tyrosinase) does not affect foxj1 expression (C) Co-injection of human RAPGEF5 mRNA can rescue the loss of foxj1 expression in Rapgef5 morphants, demonstrating the specificity of the MO. Triple asterisks indicate P<0.005.
	Figure S4. Related to Fig. 4 Translation of injected GFP tagged Î²-catenin mRNAs. Depletion of Rapgef5 by (A) ATG or (B) Splice MOs did not significantly affect translation of GFP tagged WT, ST, or NLS Î²-catenin mRNAs compared to controls.
	Figure S5. Related to Fig. 6; Developmental expression of Rapgef5 and Rap genes. In situ hybridization reveals rapgef5 mRNA is present from the earliest stages of development. It is detected in the animal pole at the 2 cell and 8 cell stages. In the stage 10 embryos expression appears diffuse around the blastopore. At stage 14 transcripts are detected in the anterior neural folds and forming GRP. rapgef5 expression is restricted to the anterior neural tube, brain, pharyngeal arches and cranial placodes at stage 28. rap1A, rap2A and rap2B are all expressed in the 4 cell embryo, in the gastrulating stage 10 embryo and in the GRP at stage 16. Expression of all three genes is also strong in the neural folds at stage 16, while rap2B also displays a speckled pattern on the lateral ectoderm. All three are expressed in the neural tube, brain, eye and pharyngeal arches at stage 28.
	Figure S6. Related to Fig. 6; The subcellular localization of Rapgef5 and Rap proteins. (A1) Rapgef5 is localized to the nuclei in a section of a stage 10 Xenopus embryo. (A2 - 7) Rapgef5 is detected specifically in the nuclei of sectioned paraffin embedded stage 28 Xenopus embryos but is reduced in morphants (Compare A2 and A3, magenta Rapgef5, blue DAPI). The lines on the schematic in A4 represent the plane of section shown in A4 and A5. A6 and A7 are higher magnification of the white boxes in A4 and A5, respectively. (B, C) Rapgef5 localizes specifically to the nuclei of mouse MEFs and human RPE cells. (D) With the exception of Rap1A all rap proteins localize both to the plasma membrane and nucleus as assayed by injection of GFP/RFP tagged constructs or by immunofluorescence.
	Figure S7. Related to Fig. 7; A Rap1 mediated transport system. (A) Validation of the CA (constitutively active) and DN (dominant negative) Rap1 constructs. RBDRalGDS selectively pulls down endogenous active RAPs, as well as the GFP tagged CA, but not the DN Rap1b mutant. (B) While the GFP tagged CA and DN Rap1 constructs can be equally detected in the total lysate, the level of the CA form is greatly reduced in the first flow through from the pull down columns, reflecting the binding of CA Rap1 to RBDRalGDS and its retention in the column. (C) Injection of CA Rap1a or Rap1b leads to an increase in total Î²-catenin protein levels relative to controls, while injection of the DN forms causes a decrease in total Î²-catenin levels. Injection of Rap2a CA or DN did not reveal a differential effect on Î²-catenin. (D) Proposed model for Rapgef5s role in nuclear localization of Î²-catenin. Rapgef5 maintains nuclear Raps in their active GTP bound confirmation, which is required for 1) â€“ the nuclear import of Î²- catenin or 2) â€“ retention of Î²-catenin within the nuclear compartment.
	rap1a (RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 3, horizontal view, animal up.
	rap1a (RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 16, lateral view, anterior left, dorsal up.
	rap1a (RAP1A, member of RAS oncogene family) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 28, lateral view, anterior left, dorsal up.
	rap2a (RAP2A, member of RAS oncogene family) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 28, lateral view, anterior left, dorsal up.
	rap2b (RAP2B, member of RAS oncogene family) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 16, lateral view, anterior left, dorsal up.
	rap2b (RAP2B, member of RAS oncogene family) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 28, lateral view, anterior left, dorsal up.
	rapgef5 (Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 5) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 2, horizontal view, animal up.
	rapgef5 (Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 5) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 14, lateral view, anterior left, dorsal up.
	rapgef5 (Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 5) gene expression in Xenopus tropicalis embryo, assayed via in situ hybridization, NF stage 28, lateral view, anterior left, dorsal up.

References [+] :

Bhanot, A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. 1996, Pubmed