Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Phys Rev E
2018 May 01;975-1:052409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052409.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Mechanical characterization of disordered and anisotropic cellular monolayers.
Nestor-Bergmann A
,
Johns E
,
Woolner S
,
Jensen OE
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
We consider a cellular monolayer, described using a vertex-based model, for which cells form a spatially disordered array of convex polygons that tile the plane. Equilibrium cell configurations are assumed to minimize a global energy defined in terms of cell areas and perimeters; energy is dissipated via dynamic area and length changes, as well as cell neighbor exchanges. The model captures our observations of an epithelium from a Xenopus embryo showing that uniaxial stretching induces spatial ordering, with cells under net tension (compression) tending to align with (against) the direction of stretch, but with the stress remaining heterogeneous at the single-cell level. We use the vertex model to derive the linearized relation between tissue-level stress, strain, and strain rate about a deformed base state, which can be used to characterize the tissue's anisotropic mechanical properties; expressions for viscoelastic tissue moduli are given as direct sums over cells. When the base state is isotropic, the model predicts that tissue properties can be tuned to a regime with high elastic shear resistance but low resistance to area changes, or vice versa.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
29906905
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC7613005 ???displayArticle.link???Phys Rev E ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Fig. 2. (a) Epithelial apical layer of a Xenopus laevis animal cap, showing 801 cells rendered as polygons superimposed on the original microscopy image. Pαeff for each cell was calculated assuming Peff¯ = 0 and (Λ,Γ) = (−0.259,0.172). Line segments indicate the principal axis of shape and stress for each cell. Darker (lighter) cells have Pαeff>0 (<0) and exert a net inward (outward) force along each line segment. (b) The apical layer in (a) following a 35% instantaneous uniaxial stretch (horizontal) of the membrane beneath the basal cells, resulting in a 19.67 ± 1.91% (95% confidence interval) uniaxial stretch of the apical cells. (c), (d) Histograms showing the frequency density of orientation of the principal axis of stress for cells under tension (darker) and compression (lighter), for apical layers given in (a) [corresponding to (c)] and (b) [corresponding to (d)]; bin areas integrate to unity. Bin size was selected using the Freedman-Diaconis rule.
Fig. 3. (a) A simulation of a representative monolayer realization satisfying Peff¯ = 0 with 800 cells, for (Λ,Γ) = (−0.259,0.172) (see Fig. 1 for the location in parameter space). Cell shadings and line segments follow the scheme in Fig. 2. (b) The monolayer in (a) following a 20% area-preserving uniaxial stretch and subsequent relaxation. (c), (d) Histograms showing the orientation of the principal axis of stress for cells under tension (darker) and compression (lighter), for monolayers given in (a) [corresponding to (c)] and (b) [corresponding to (d)]. Bin size was selected using the Freedman-Diaconis rule.
Fig. 4. (a) The effect of incremental stretch on effective tissue pressure. The tissue shown in Fig. 3(a) was subjected to a 30% area-preserving uniaxial stretch in a varying number of steps (straight lines are drawn between data points). The total stretch was divided into equally spaced increments and the tissue was relaxed after every stretch. The tissue starts at Peff¯ = 0 and ends at approximately Peff¯ = 0.57, regardless of how many steps were used. Translucent shading indicates 95% confidence intervals over the five simulations. (b) Shear stress ξ vs magnitude of stretch with (Λ,Γ) = (−0.259,0.172) (solid; the monolayer given in Fig. 3) and (Λ,Γ) = (−0.569,0.145) (dashed). See Fig. 1(b) for locations in parameter space. Each data point represents an instantaneous stretch performed on the same initial isotropic monolayer satisfying Pext = 0. The monolayers were relaxed to equilibrium following stretch.
Fig. 5. Perturbation stress response to small-amplitude deformations in a prestretched monolayer. The stretched monolayers used were the same as those for the solid line in Fig. 4(b), with (Λ,Γ) = (−0.259,0.172) and the magnitude of prestretch is indicated on the x axis. The equilibrium prestretched monolayers were subjected to small deformations in the x [EX = diag(λ,0)] and y [Ey = diag(0,λ)] directions, with λ = 0.01. The component of the perturbation stress tensor in the direction of stretch is indicated on the y axis, with Δσxxℳ(EY) giving the x-directed stress following EX (lower line) and Δσyyℳ(EX) giving the y-directed stress following Ey (upper line). Solid lines indicate values directly evaluated using (12) and dashed lines are predicted values using (28).
Fig. 6. (a) Heat map across discrete intervals of (Λ,Γ) parameter space showing the value of the analytic bulk elastic modulus Ke [calculated using (33)] of a disordered isotropic monolayer with 800 cells. (b) Equivalent plot of the analytic shear modulus [calculated using (37)]. (c) Computationally estimated shear modulus across parameter space. The elastic shear modulus Ge was estimated from the global perturbation stress as Δσxyℳ=−κGe, following a 1% simple-shear deformation (k = 0.01) on the simulated monolayers used in (b). Each data point is taken as an average from five realizations of a monolayer with 800 cells, with Pext = 0. (d) Percentage difference (|Ge−Geiso|/[0.5(Ge+Geiso)]) between the exact modulus Ge (37) and the approximation Geiso (38), across parameter space; the difference is below 2% in the hatched region.
Fig. 7. Heat map across discrete intervals of (Λ,Γ) parameter space showing the value of log(ΔPeff¯/ξ^). The dashed line represents the contour where ΔPeff¯=ξ^: Tissues show dominant resistance to area change in the shaded region to the left of the dashed line [where log(ΔPeff¯/Δξ)>0, region A], and to shear in the region to the right [where log(ΔPeff¯/Δξ)<0, region B]. A log scale is used to help display the differences across a large range of values. The monolayers used for all heat maps were the same as those used in Fig. 6, where each data point is taken as an average from five realizations of a monolayer with 800 cells, with Peff¯=0.
Alt,
Vertex models: from cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis.
2017, Pubmed
Alt,
Vertex models: from cell mechanics to tissue morphogenesis.
2017,
Pubmed
Bambardekar,
Direct laser manipulation reveals the mechanics of cell contacts in vivo.
2015,
Pubmed
Bielmeier,
Interface Contractility between Differently Fated Cells Drives Cell Elimination and Cyst Formation.
2016,
Pubmed
Brodland,
CellFIT: a cellular force-inference toolkit using curvilinear cell boundaries.
2014,
Pubmed
Carney,
Mechanisms of visual loss in corneal edema.
1984,
Pubmed
Clément,
Viscoelastic Dissipation Stabilizes Cell Shape Changes during Tissue Morphogenesis.
2017,
Pubmed
Donev,
Pair correlation function characteristics of nearly jammed disordered and ordered hard-sphere packings.
2005,
Pubmed
Doubrovinski,
Measurement of cortical elasticity in Drosophila melanogaster embryos using ferrofluids.
2017,
Pubmed
Evans,
A geometric exploration of stress in deformed liquid foams.
2017,
Pubmed
Farhadifar,
The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing.
2007,
Pubmed
Fletcher,
Vertex models of epithelial morphogenesis.
2014,
Pubmed
Fletcher,
Mechanocellular models of epithelial morphogenesis.
2017,
Pubmed
Fozard,
Continuum approximations of individual-based models for epithelial monolayers.
2010,
Pubmed
Guillot,
Mechanics of epithelial tissue homeostasis and morphogenesis.
2013,
Pubmed
Guirao,
Unified quantitative characterization of epithelial tissue development.
2015,
Pubmed
Hannezo,
Theory of epithelial sheet morphology in three dimensions.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Harris,
Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers.
2012,
Pubmed
Heisenberg,
Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning.
2013,
Pubmed
Ishihara,
Bayesian inference of force dynamics during morphogenesis.
2012,
Pubmed
Ishihara,
From cells to tissue: A continuum model of epithelial mechanics.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ishimoto,
Bubbly vertex dynamics: A dynamical and geometrical model for epithelial tissues with curved cell shapes.
2014,
Pubmed
Jason Gao,
Embryo as an active granular fluid: stress-coordinated cellular constriction chains.
2016,
Pubmed
Jiao,
Spatial organization and correlations of cell nuclei in brain tumors.
2011,
Pubmed
Joshi,
Live-cell imaging and quantitative analysis of embryonic epithelial cells in Xenopus laevis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kanda,
Histone-GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells.
1998,
Pubmed
Kraynik,
Structure of random monodisperse foam.
2003,
Pubmed
Kursawe,
Approximate Bayesian computation reveals the importance of repeated measurements for parameterising cell-based models of growing tissues.
2018,
Pubmed
Lecuit,
Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis.
2007,
Pubmed
Majmudar,
Contact force measurements and stress-induced anisotropy in granular materials.
2005,
Pubmed
Merzouki,
The mechanical properties of a cell-based numerical model of epithelium.
2016,
Pubmed
Murisic,
From discrete to continuum models of three-dimensional deformations in epithelial sheets.
2015,
Pubmed
Nestor-Bergmann,
Decoupling the Roles of Cell Shape and Mechanical Stress in Orienting and Cueing Epithelial Mitosis.
2019,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nestor-Bergmann,
Relating cell shape and mechanical stress in a spatially disordered epithelium using a vertex-based model.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Okuda,
Vertex dynamics simulations of viscosity-dependent deformation during tissue morphogenesis.
2015,
Pubmed
Pathmanathan,
A computational study of discrete mechanical tissue models.
2009,
Pubmed
Preziosi,
An elasto-visco-plastic model of cell aggregates.
2010,
Pubmed
Schluck,
Mechanical control of organ size in the development of the Drosophila wing disc.
2013,
Pubmed
Sokac,
Cdc42-dependent actin polymerization during compensatory endocytosis in Xenopus eggs.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Spencer,
Vertex stability and topological transitions in vertex models of foams and epithelia.
2017,
Pubmed
Staple,
Mechanics and remodelling of cell packings in epithelia.
2010,
Pubmed
Sugimura,
The mechanical anisotropy in a tissue promotes ordering in hexagonal cell packing.
2013,
Pubmed
Weickenmeier,
Elastic-viscoplastic modeling of soft biological tissues using a mixed finite element formulation based on the relative deformation gradient.
2014,
Pubmed
Woolner,
Myosin-10 and actin filaments are essential for mitotic spindle function.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wyatt,
Emergence of homeostatic epithelial packing and stress dissipation through divisions oriented along the long cell axis.
2015,
Pubmed
Xu,
Oriented cell division affects the global stress and cell packing geometry of a monolayer under stretch.
2016,
Pubmed
Xu,
A Tensegrity Model of Cell Reorientation on Cyclically Stretched Substrates.
2016,
Pubmed
Xu,
Integrin activation and internalization mediated by extracellular matrix elasticity: a biomechanical model.
2014,
Pubmed
Xu,
How do changes at the cell level affect the mechanical properties of epithelial monolayers?
2015,
Pubmed
Yang,
Correlating cell shape and cellular stress in motile confluent tissues.
2017,
Pubmed