Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
PLoS One
2015 Jan 01;103:e0111655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111655.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Unique gene expression profile of the proliferating Xenopus tadpoletail blastema cells deciphered by RNA-sequencing analysis.
Tsujioka H
,
Kunieda T
,
Katou Y
,
Shirahige K
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Organ regenerative ability depends on the animal species and the developmental stage. The molecular bases for variable organ regenerative ability, however, remain unknown. Previous studies have identified genes preferentially expressed in the blastema tissues in various animals, but transcriptome analysis of the isolated proliferating blastema cells has not yet been reported. In the present study, we used RNA-sequencing analysis to analyze the gene expression profile of isolated proliferating blastema cells of regenerating Xenopus laevis tadpole tails. We used flow cytometry to isolate proliferating cells, and non-proliferating blastema cells, from regenerating tadpole tails as well as proliferating tail bud cells from tail bud embryos, the latter two of which were used as control cells, based on their DNA content. Among the 28 candidate genes identified by RNA-sequencing analysis, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction identified 10 genes whose expression was enriched in regenerating tadpole tails compared with non-regenerating tadpole tails or tails from the tail bud embryos. Among them, whole mount in situ hybridization revealed that chromosome segregation 1-like and interleukin 11 were expressed in the broad area of the tailblastema, while brevican, lysyl oxidase, and keratin 18 were mainly expressed in the notochord bud in regenerating tails. We further combined whole mount in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry for the incorporated 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine to confirm that keratin 18 and interleukin 11 were expressed in the proliferating tailblastema cells. Based on the proposed functions of their homologs in other animal species, these genes might have roles in the extracellular matrix formation in the notochord bud (brevican and lysyl oxidase), cell proliferation (chromosome segregation 1-like and keratin 18), and in the maintenance of the differentiation ability of proliferating blastema cells (interleukin 11) in regenerating tadpole tails.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
25775398
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC4361676 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One
Fig 2. Isolation of proliferating and non-proliferating tail blastema cells and proliferating tail bud cells using flow cytometry.(A) A schematic drawing of the cell preparation procedure. Xenopus images were obtained from [18] and modified. (B,C) Cell cycle analysis of cells in (B) tail blastemas and (C) tail buds using flow cytometry. Horizontal axes represent relative fluorescent intensity of Hoechst blue, which reflects DNA contents, and vertical axes represent relative cell counts. The cells were classified into G0/G1 phases (major peaks), and S/G2/M phases (whose DNA contents were higher than those of cells in the major peak and lower than twice of those of cells in the major peak) based on the DNA content. Cell fractions colored in red (â2X-tail blastemaâ cell fraction), blue (â4X-tail blastemaâ cell fraction), and green (â4X-tail budâ cell fraction), respectively, were collected and subjected to RNA-sequence analysis. (D) Comparison of expression levels of cell cycle markers. Relative expression levels were estimated from RNA-sequencing data, taking the values in the â2X-tail blastemaâ cell fraction as 1. Expression levels of ef1α, a housekeeping gene, were almost the same in all samples.
Fig 3. RNA-sequencing analysis of genes preferentially expressed in proliferating or non-proliferating tail blastema cells as well as proliferating tail bud cells.Genes preferentially expressed in each cell fraction were identified by RNA-sequencing analysis. (A) Genes that are up-regulated for more than 2-folds in R4 than in R2 or E4. (B) Genes down-regulated for more than 2-folds in R4 than in R2 or E4. (C,D) Genes whose FPKMs in R4 were larger than 1 (C) or 10 (D). (E) Flow chart for identification of genes expressed preferentially in the proliferating tail blastema cells.
Fig 4. Identification of genes expressed preferentially in the tail blastema by qRT-PCR.The relative expression levels of the 10 genes which show the blastema-selective expression by qRT-PCR using RNAs extracted from normal tails (orange), regenerating tails (blue), and tail buds (green). The vertical axis represents relative expression levels calculated by taking the value of blastemas as 1, following normalization using those of ef1α. (mean ± SE, n = 4) *P < 0.05, Dunnett’s test. Abbreviations: cse1l, chromosome segregation 1-like; l1td1, LINE-1 type transposase domain-containing protein 1; oax, oocyte activation in Xenopus.
Fig 5. Expression analysis of candidate genes in regenerating tadpole tails by whole mount in situ hybridization.(A-E) Whole mount in situ hybridization using 3-dpa regenerating tails of St. 49-53 tadpoles for (A) interleukin 11, (B) keratin 18, (C) brevican, (D) cse1l, and (E) lysyl oxidase (blue/purple). (F-M) Sagittal sections of tailblastema from 3-dpa regenerating tails of St. 49-53 tadpoles double stained by whole mount in situ hybridization for (F-I) interleukin 11 and (J-M) keratin 18 (magenta) and BrdU-immunohistochemistry (green). (G) and (K) show magenta channels (mRNA), (H) and (L) show green channels (BrdU), (I) and (M) show blue channels (nuclei stained with Hoechst 33342), and (F) and (J) show merged images. Note that mRNA signals detected in the cytoplasm do not exactly merge with BrdU-signals detected in the nuclei. White broken lines indicate cell populations that highly expressed the genes. Anterior is to the left, and dorsal is up. Scale bars indicate 500 μm in (A-E) and 100 μm in (F-M).
Fig 1. BrdU-immunohistochemistry of the proliferating cells in amputated tail stumps and tail buds. Sagittal sections from (A-D) tails stumps at 1, 2, 3,
and 4 dpa of St. 49-53 tadpoles or (G) a tail bud of St. 35-39 tadpole were subjected to immunohistochemistry using anti-BrdU antibody (red), and the nuclei
were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). BrdU-positive cells were enriched in the tail blastema at 3 dpa, and in the tail bud. (E) Schematic drawing of
a 3-dpa tail stump. (F) A magnified view of the region delineated by the square in panel (E). Anterior is to the left, and dorsal is up. Scale bars indicate 100 μm.
df, dorsal fin; s, spinal cord; n, notochord; b, blastema; vf, ventralfin; sa, spinal cord ampulla; nb, notochord bud; w, wound epithelium.
Allen,
The SINE-encoded mouse B2 RNA represses mRNA transcription in response to heat shock.
2004, Pubmed
Allen,
The SINE-encoded mouse B2 RNA represses mRNA transcription in response to heat shock.
2004,
Pubmed
Altschul,
Basic local alignment search tool.
1990,
Pubmed
Bamba,
Regulation of IL-11 expression in intestinal myofibroblasts: role of c-Jun AP-1- and MAPK-dependent pathways.
2003,
Pubmed
Bartz,
Respiratory syncytial virus induces prostaglandin E2, IL-10 and IL-11 generation in antigen presenting cells.
2002,
Pubmed
Beck,
Molecular pathways needed for regeneration of spinal cord and muscle in a vertebrate.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chen,
Identification of an expressed truncated form of CD200, CD200tr, which is a physiologic antagonist of CD200-induced suppression.
2008,
Pubmed
Corcoran,
Keratin 8 and 18 expression in mesenchymal progenitor cells of regenerating limbs is associated with cell proliferation and differentiation.
1997,
Pubmed
Fang,
Translational profiling of cardiomyocytes identifies an early Jak1/Stat3 injury response required for zebrafish heart regeneration.
2013,
Pubmed
Frischknecht,
Brevican: a key proteoglycan in the perisynaptic extracellular matrix of the brain.
2012,
Pubmed
Fukazawa,
Suppression of the immune response potentiates tadpole tail regeneration during the refractory period.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gargioli,
Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Geach,
Members of the lysyl oxidase family are expressed during the development of the frog Xenopus laevis.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Grow,
Global analysis of gene expression in Xenopus hindlimbs during stage-dependent complete and incomplete regeneration.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hama,
Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain.
2011,
Pubmed
Hoek,
Down-regulation of the macrophage lineage through interaction with OX2 (CD200).
2000,
Pubmed
Isoe,
p53 Mutation suppresses adult neurogenesis in medaka fish (Oryzias latipes).
2012,
Pubmed
James-Zorn,
Xenbase: expansion and updates of the Xenopus model organism database.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kernacki,
Early cytokine and chemokine gene expression during Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal infection in mice.
1998,
Pubmed
King,
Identification of genes expressed during Xenopus laevis limb regeneration by using subtractive hybridization.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kiya,
Inducible- and constitutive-type transcript variants of kakusei , a novel non-coding immediate early gene, in the honeybee brain.
2008,
Pubmed
Knapp,
Comparative transcriptional profiling of the axolotl limb identifies a tripartite regeneration-specific gene program.
2013,
Pubmed
Kragl,
Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration.
2009,
Pubmed
Langmead,
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
2009,
Pubmed
Lin,
Purification of hematopoietic stem cells using the side population.
2006,
Pubmed
Lin,
Imparting regenerative capacity to limbs by progenitor cell transplantation.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Liu,
Reactivating head regrowth in a regeneration-deficient planarian species.
2013,
Pubmed
Love,
Amputation-induced reactive oxygen species are required for successful Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Love,
Carbohydrate metabolism during vertebrate appendage regeneration: what is its role? How is it regulated?: A postulation that regenerating vertebrate appendages facilitate glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathways to fuel macromolecule biosynthesis.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Love,
Genome-wide analysis of gene expression during Xenopus tropicalis tadpole tail regeneration.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
McGowan,
Periodic biosynthesis of the human M-phase promoting factor catalytic subunit p34 during the cell cycle.
1990,
Pubmed
Monaghan,
Microarray and cDNA sequence analysis of transcription during nerve-dependent limb regeneration.
2009,
Pubmed
Mukaigasa,
The keratin-related Ouroboros proteins function as immune antigens mediating tail regression in Xenopus metamorphosis.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Naora,
Expression analysis of XPhyH-like during development and tail regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles: possible role of XPhyH-like expressing immune cells in impaired tail regenerative ability.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Närvä,
RNA-binding protein L1TD1 interacts with LIN28 via RNA and is required for human embryonic stem cell self-renewal and cancer cell proliferation.
2012,
Pubmed
Nishioka,
Lysyl oxidase: from basic science to future cancer treatment.
2012,
Pubmed
Ogryzko,
Antisense inhibition of CAS, the human homologue of the yeast chromosome segregation gene CSE1, interferes with mitosis in HeLa cells.
1997,
Pubmed
Okada,
SINEs.
1991,
Pubmed
Pearl,
Identification of genes associated with regenerative success of Xenopus laevis hindlimbs.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Peterson,
Qualitative modeling identifies IL-11 as a novel regulator in maintaining self-renewal in human pluripotent stem cells.
2013,
Pubmed
Sander,
Xenopus brevican is expressed in the notochord and the brain during early embryogenesis.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sikes,
Restoration of anterior regeneration in a planarian with limited regenerative ability.
2013,
Pubmed
Stoick-Cooper,
Advances in signaling in vertebrate regeneration as a prelude to regenerative medicine.
2007,
Pubmed
Tazaki,
Macroarray-based analysis of tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis larvae.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Teramura,
Interleukin-11 enhances human megakaryocytopoiesis in vitro.
1992,
Pubmed
Trapnell,
Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks.
2012,
Pubmed
Trepicchio,
Recombinant human IL-11 attenuates the inflammatory response through down-regulation of proinflammatory cytokine release and nitric oxide production.
1996,
Pubmed
Umesono,
The molecular logic for planarian regeneration along the anterior-posterior axis.
2013,
Pubmed
van Rooij,
A fractal approach to dynamic inference and distribution analysis.
2013,
Pubmed
Wakefield,
The activation of RNA synthesis by somatic nuclei injected into amphibian oocytes.
1983,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wasner,
Three CCAAT-boxes and a single cell cycle genes homology region (CHR) are the major regulating sites for transcription from the human cyclin B2 promoter.
2003,
Pubmed
Wellmann,
Localization of the cell proliferation and apoptosis-associated CAS protein in lymphoid neoplasms.
1997,
Pubmed
Whitehead,
fgf20 is essential for initiating zebrafish fin regeneration.
2005,
Pubmed
Wu,
De novo transcriptome sequencing of axolotl blastema for identification of differentially expressed genes during limb regeneration.
2013,
Pubmed
