Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Genome editing using engineered nucleases is used for targeted mutagenesis. But because genome editing does not target all loci with similar efficiencies, the mutation hit-rate at a given locus needs to be evaluated. The analysis of mutants obtained using engineered nucleases requires specific methods for mutation detection, and the enzyme mismatch cleavage method is used commonly for this purpose. This method uses enzymes that cleave heteroduplex DNA at mismatches and extrahelical loops formed by single or multiple nucleotides. Bacteriophage resolvases and single-stranded nucleases are used commonly in the assay but have not been compared side-by-side on mutations obtained by engineered nucleases. We present the first comparison of the sensitivity of T7E1 and Surveyor EMC assays on deletions and point mutations obtained by zinc finger nuclease targeting in frog embryos. We report the mutation detection limits and efficiencies of T7E1 and Surveyor. In addition, we find that T7E1 outperforms the Surveyor nuclease in terms of sensitivity with deletion substrates, whereas Surveyor is better for detecting single nucleotide changes. We conclude that T7E1 is the preferred enzyme to scan mutations triggered by engineered nucleases.
Figure 1. Comparison of Surveyor and T7E1 efficiencies. Electropherograms obtained on three different DNA products (exon 2a, exon 3, and exon 6) treated using either the Surveyor (top two rows) or T7E1 enzyme (bottom two rows). The Surveyor and T7E1 assays were made on a 50% mix of wild-type and 20-bp deletion mutants. For the Surveyor and T7E1 negative controls (co-), we prepared individual reactions using only wild-type or mutant DNA and pooled the products before electrophoresis. Peaks colored in gray correspond to the internal molecular weight standards: the small molecular weight marker measures 15 bp and the large measures 1500 bp. Peaks labeled with an asterisk (*) correspond to uncleaved DNA, peaks labeled ⢠and ⬥ correspond to cleaved DNA heteroduplex.
Figure 2. Limits of sensitivity of Surveyor and T7E1 on different templates. Electropherograms obtained on DNA products from exon 2a, 3, and 6 after Surveyor or T7E1 digestion. The Surveyor and T7E1 assays were made on a mix composed of 5% 20-bp deletion mutants and 95% of wild-type DNA. Peaks colored in gray correspond to the internal molecular weight standards: the small molecular weight marker measures 15 bp and the large measures 1500 bp. Peaks labeled with an asterisk (*) correspond to uncleaved DNA, peaks labeled ⢠and ⬥ correspond to cleaved DNA heteroduplex.
Figure 3. Comparison of Surveyor and T7E1 sensitivity. Electropherograms obtained on exon 3 DNA products after Surveyor or T7E1 digestion. The percentage indicated on the right corresponds to the quantity of mutant DNA in a pool of mutant and wild-type DNA. The Surveyor and T7E1 negative controls (co-) correspond to reactions made using mutant DNA only (100%). Peaks colored in gray correspond to the internal molecular weight standards: the small molecular weight marker measures 15 bp and the large measures 1500 bp. Peaks labeled with an asterisk (*) correspond to uncleaved DNA, peaks labeled ⢠and ⬥ correspond to cleaved DNA heteroduplex.
Figure 4. Quantification of Surveyor and T7E1 efficiency and sensitivity. This graph shows the fraction of cleaved products from all products (y-axis) in a mixture composed of various quantities of deletion mutants of exon 3 in a population of mutant and wild-type DNA molecules (x-axis). Open circles correspond to T7E1 digestion products, open squares correspond to Surveyor digestion products.
Figure 5. Comparison of Surveyor and T7E1 efficiencies on point mutations. The top of this figure presents schematics of the D15 and D19 sequence differences in comparison with the wild-type smn exon 2a. The electrophoregrams obtained on D15 or D19 DNA products are presented from top to bottom in the following order: after T7E1 digestion, after Surveyor digestion, and an overlay of the two conditions. The size of the peaks is given in base pairs. Only peaks called by the software were labeled. Peaks matching the size of a partial digestion product are written in bold italics. Boxed peaks are discussed in the text. The portions of the small and large markers have been omitted for clarity.
Babon,
Improved strategy for mutation detection--a modification to the enzyme mismatch cleavage method.
1995, Pubmed
Babon,
Improved strategy for mutation detection--a modification to the enzyme mismatch cleavage method.
1995,
Pubmed
Behrensdorf,
Rapid parallel mutation scanning of gene fragments using a microelectronic protein-DNA chip format.
2002,
Pubmed
Bentley,
Targeted recovery of mutations in Drosophila.
2000,
Pubmed
Beumer,
Efficient gene targeting in Drosophila by direct embryo injection with zinc-finger nucleases.
2008,
Pubmed
Bhattacharyya,
Single base mismatches in DNA. Long- and short-range structure probed by analysis of axis trajectory and local chemical reactivity.
1989,
Pubmed
Coghill,
A gene-driven approach to the identification of ENU mutants in the mouse.
2002,
Pubmed
Colbert,
High-throughput screening for induced point mutations.
2001,
Pubmed
Comai,
Efficient discovery of DNA polymorphisms in natural populations by Ecotilling.
2004,
Pubmed
Dahlem,
Simple methods for generating and detecting locus-specific mutations induced with TALENs in the zebrafish genome.
2012,
Pubmed
Déclais,
New insight into the recognition of branched DNA structure by junction-resolving enzymes.
2008,
Pubmed
Déclais,
Structural recognition between a four-way DNA junction and a resolving enzyme.
2006,
Pubmed
Dodgson,
Action of single-strand specific nucleases on model DNA heteroduplexes of defined size and sequence.
1977,
Pubmed
Freeman,
The importance of the N-terminus of T7 endonuclease I in the interaction with DNA junctions.
2013,
Pubmed
Gaj,
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Geurts,
Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases.
2009,
Pubmed
Gohlke,
Kinking of DNA and RNA helices by bulged nucleotides observed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer.
1994,
Pubmed
Guo,
Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Guschin,
A rapid and general assay for monitoring endogenous gene modification.
2010,
Pubmed
Hadden,
The structural basis of Holliday junction resolution by T7 endonuclease I.
2007,
Pubmed
Ho,
Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction.
1989,
Pubmed
Holkers,
Differential integrity of TALE nuclease genes following adenoviral and lentiviral vector gene transfer into human cells.
2013,
Pubmed
Howard,
Heteroduplex cleavage analysis using S1 nuclease.
1999,
Pubmed
Huang,
A simple, high sensitivity mutation screening using Ampligase mediated T7 endonuclease I and Surveyor nuclease with microfluidic capillary electrophoresis.
2012,
Pubmed
Isalan,
Zinc-finger nucleases: how to play two good hands.
2011,
Pubmed
Ishibashi,
Highly efficient bi-allelic mutation rates using TALENs in Xenopus tropicalis.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Judo,
Stimulation and suppression of PCR-mediated recombination.
1998,
Pubmed
Kim,
TALENs and ZFNs are associated with different mutation signatures.
2013,
Pubmed
Lahr,
Reducing the impact of PCR-mediated recombination in molecular evolution and environmental studies using a new-generation high-fidelity DNA polymerase.
2009,
Pubmed
Lei,
Efficient targeted gene disruption in Xenopus embryos using engineered transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs).
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Maier,
Efficient clinical scale gene modification via zinc finger nuclease-targeted disruption of the HIV co-receptor CCR5.
2013,
Pubmed
Mashal,
Detection of mutations by cleavage of DNA heteroduplexes with bacteriophage resolvases.
1995,
Pubmed
Miller,
A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing.
2011,
Pubmed
Nakajima,
Comparison of TALEN scaffolds in Xenopus tropicalis.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Oleykowski,
Mutation detection using a novel plant endonuclease.
1998,
Pubmed
Perry,
A TILLING reverse genetics tool and a web-accessible collection of mutants of the legume Lotus japonicus.
2003,
Pubmed
Qiu,
Mutation detection using Surveyor nuclease.
2004,
Pubmed
Sakurai,
A single blastocyst assay optimized for detecting CRISPR/Cas9 system-induced indel mutations in mice.
2014,
Pubmed
Sanjana,
A transcription activator-like effector toolbox for genome engineering.
2012,
Pubmed
Slade,
A reverse genetic, nontransgenic approach to wheat crop improvement by TILLING.
2005,
Pubmed
Suzuki,
High efficiency TALENs enable F0 functional analysis by targeted gene disruption in Xenopus laevis embryos.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Taylor,
Enzymatic methods for mutation scanning.
1999,
Pubmed
Terns,
CRISPR-based technologies: prokaryotic defense weapons repurposed.
2014,
Pubmed
Tesson,
Knockout rats generated by embryo microinjection of TALENs.
2011,
Pubmed
Till,
Mismatch cleavage by single-strand specific nucleases.
2004,
Pubmed
Triques,
Mutation detection using ENDO1: application to disease diagnostics in humans and TILLING and Eco-TILLING in plants.
2008,
Pubmed
Triques,
Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana mismatch specific endonucleases: application to mutation discovery by TILLING in pea.
2007,
Pubmed
Tsuji,
Development of a simple and highly sensitive mutation screening system by enzyme mismatch cleavage with optimized conditions for standard laboratories.
2008,
Pubmed
van Rensburg,
Chromatin structure of two genomic sites for targeted transgene integration in induced pluripotent stem cells and hematopoietic stem cells.
2013,
Pubmed
Voskarides,
Screening for mutations in kidney-related genes using SURVEYOR nuclease for cleavage at heteroduplex mismatches.
2009,
Pubmed
Wagner,
Mutation detection using immobilized mismatch binding protein (MutS).
1995,
Pubmed
Wienholds,
Efficient target-selected mutagenesis in zebrafish.
2003,
Pubmed
Yang,
Purification, cloning, and characterization of the CEL I nuclease.
2000,
Pubmed
Yeung,
Enzymatic mutation detection technologies.
2005,
Pubmed
Ymlahi-Ouazzani,
Reduced levels of survival motor neuron protein leads to aberrant motoneuron growth in a Xenopus model of muscular atrophy.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Youil,
Screening for mutations by enzyme mismatch cleavage with T4 endonuclease VII.
1995,
Pubmed
Young,
Efficient targeted gene disruption in the soma and germ line of the frog Xenopus tropicalis using engineered zinc-finger nucleases.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase