Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Nucleic Acids Res
2011 Sep 01;3917:7816-27. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr419.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
The structural basis for partitioning of the XRCC1/DNA ligase III-α BRCT-mediated dimer complexes.
Cuneo MJ
,
Gabel SA
,
Krahn JM
,
Ricker MA
,
London RE
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The ultimate step common to almost all DNA repair pathways is the ligation of the nicked intermediate to form contiguous double-stranded DNA. In the mammalian nucleotide and base excision repair pathways, the ligation step is carried out by ligase III-α. For efficient ligation, ligase III-α is constitutively bound to the scaffolding protein XRCC1 through interactions between the C-terminal BRCT domains of each protein. Although structural data for the individual domains has been available, no structure of the complex has been determined and several alternative proposals for this interaction have been advanced. Interpretation of the models is complicated by the formation of homodimers that, depending on the model, may either contribute to, or compete with heterodimer formation. We report here the structures of both homodimer complexes as well as the heterodimer complex. Structural characterization of the heterodimer formed from a longer XRCC1 BRCT domain construct, including residues comprising the interdomain linker region, revealed an expanded heterodimer interface with the ligase III-α BRCT domain. This enhanced linker-mediated binding interface plays a significant role in the determination of heterodimer/homodimer selectivity. These data provide fundamental insights into the structural basis of BRCT-mediated dimerization, and resolve questions related to the organization of this important repair complex.
Figure 1. Structure of the X1BRCTb homodimer. (A) Ribbon diagram of the X1BRCTb homodimer. The monomers are colored in cyan and blue. (B) Close-up view of the hydrogen bonding network between X1BRCTb monomers. (C) Close-up view of the homodimer interface illustrating the hydrophobic contacts. Amino acid side-chains that are found to be part of the interface are represented as stick models. Labels are shown only for hydrophobic residues.
Figure 2. Structure of homodimeric L3BRCT. Two conformationally distinct homodimers were identified in the crystal structure and are shown in (A) and (B). The two structures differ by 13° in the relative orientation of the L3BRCT monomers. (C) Close-up view of the interface amino acids and hydrogen bonding network between the L3BRCTmonomers from the homodimer in (A). (D) Close-up view of the interface amino acids and hydrogen-bonding network between the L3BRCTmonomers from the homodimer in (B). Hydrogen bonds between monomers are represented as black dashed lines and residues involved in hydrogen bonds are labeled.
Figure 3. Structure of X1BRCTb/L3BRCT tetramer. (A) Overall structure of the tetrameric X1BRCTb/L3BRCT complex (L3BRCT monomers are represented as red and magenta ribbon models; X1BRCTb monomers are represented as blue and cyan ribbon models). The 2-fold non-crystallographic axis in the z-plane of the page is represented as a black circle. (B) Close-up view of the X1BRCTb/L3BRCT heterodimer interface (amino acids found at the interface are shown in stick representation. (C) X1BRCTb/L3BRCT heterodimer from view (B) rotated 180° about the y-axis. The hydrophobic cleft on L3BRCT is shown in a grey surface representation. (D) Close-up view of the homodimer interface from the X1BRCTb/L3BRCT heterodimer (amino acids found at the interface are shown in stick representation, L596 is shown as a gray surface and water molecules are shown as red spheres).
Figure 4. Gel-filtration of X1BRCTb complexed with L3BRCT. X1BRCTb/L3BRCT in 150âmM NaCl (black dashed line) and 1âM NaCl (gray solid line), and X1BRCTb Leu596Arg/L3BRCT in 150âmM NaCl (gray dashed line). The straight line (black) is a fit of the gel filtration standards (black squares) used to estimate the molecular mass of the complexes.
Figure 5. Small-angle X-ray scattering of double mutant heterodimer. (A) SAXS intensity data of X1BRCTb(Y574R,L596R)/L3BRCT heterodimer. Black line is the raw scattering data with associated errors and the red line is the fit to the X-ray crystal structure of the X1BRCTb/L3BRCT dimer from the tetrameric crystal structure. Insets are the Guinier fit and the pair-wise distribution function. (B) Ab initio SAXS envelope model superimposed with the X-ray crystal structure of the X1BRCTb/L3BRCT dimer from the tetrameric crystal structure. X1BRCTb is shown in a cyan ribbon representation and L3BRCT is shown in a magenta ribbon representation.
Figure 6. Conservation of X1BRCTb/L3BRCT protein interface residues. (A) Amino acid composition of the X1BRCTb and L3BRCT homodimer interface. Amino acids composing the protein interfaces are highlighted in red and those involved in hydrogen-bonding interactions are underlined. (B) X1BRCTb hydrogen-bonding network superimposed with the conserved residues from L3BRCT. X1BRCTb monomers are colored in blue tones; side-chains involved in forming the interface and homodimer hydrogen bonds are colored the same, numbered and shown as stick representations. Side-chains from the L3BRCT homodimer are also shown as stick representations that are colored orange and magenta. (C) L3BRCT hydrogen bonding network superimposed with the conserved residues from X1BRCTb [colored as in (B)]. Residues circled in (B) and (C) are circled in (A).
Figure 7. Structure of the X1BRCTb(Y574R)-extended/L3BRCT complex. (A) Overall structure of the tetrameric X1BRCTb(Y574R)-extended/L3BRCT complex (L3BRCT monomers are represented as red and magenta ribbon models; X1BRCTb(Y574R)-extended monomers are represented as blue and cyan ribbon models). (B) Close-up view of the X1BRCTb-extended/L3BRCT heterodimer interface (amino acids found at the interface are shown in stick representation and amino acids composing the L3BRCT peptide-binding site are shown as a pale green surface; non-interacting surfaces of the ligase are colored in magenta). (C) Circular dichroism temperature melts of X1BRCTb (green), X1BRCTb(Y574) extended (blue), X1BRCTb/L3BRCT (black), X1BRCTb(Y574R)-extended/L3BRCT (red). Inset is a schematic representing the constructs used for the temperature melts (X1, X1BRCTb; L3, L3BRCT).
Ali,
Prevalence of BER gene polymorphisms in sporadic breast cancer.
2008, Pubmed
Ali,
Prevalence of BER gene polymorphisms in sporadic breast cancer.
2008,
Pubmed
Beernink,
Specificity of protein interactions mediated by BRCT domains of the XRCC1 DNA repair protein.
2005,
Pubmed
Berquist,
Functional capacity of XRCC1 protein variants identified in DNA repair-deficient Chinese hamster ovary cell lines and the human population.
2010,
Pubmed
Caldecott,
XRCC1 and DNA strand break repair.
2003,
Pubmed
Caldecott,
An interaction between the mammalian DNA repair protein XRCC1 and DNA ligase III.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Clements,
The ataxia-oculomotor apraxia 1 gene product has a role distinct from ATM and interacts with the DNA strand break repair proteins XRCC1 and XRCC4.
2004,
Pubmed
Cohen,
Stability of yeast iso-1-ferricytochrome c as a function of pH and temperature.
1994,
Pubmed
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4,
The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography.
1994,
Pubmed
Cuneo,
Oxidation state of the XRCC1 N-terminal domain regulates DNA polymerase beta binding affinity.
2010,
Pubmed
Date,
The FHA domain of aprataxin interacts with the C-terminal region of XRCC1.
2004,
Pubmed
Derbyshire,
Crystal structure of human 53BP1 BRCT domains bound to p53 tumour suppressor.
2002,
Pubmed
Dulic,
BRCT domain interactions in the heterodimeric DNA repair protein XRCC1-DNA ligase III.
2001,
Pubmed
Emsley,
Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics.
2004,
Pubmed
Glover,
Interactions between BRCT repeats and phosphoproteins: tangled up in two.
2004,
Pubmed
Huyton,
The BRCA1 C-terminal domain: structure and function.
2000,
Pubmed
Joo,
Structure of the 53BP1 BRCT region bound to p53 and its comparison to the Brca1 BRCT structure.
2002,
Pubmed
Lévy,
XRCC1 interacts with the p58 subunit of DNA Pol alpha-primase and may coordinate DNA repair and replication during S phase.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Luo,
A new XRCC1-containing complex and its role in cellular survival of methyl methanesulfonate treatment.
2004,
Pubmed
Masson,
XRCC1 is specifically associated with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and negatively regulates its activity following DNA damage.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moser,
RETRACTED: Sealing of chromosomal DNA nicks during nucleotide excision repair requires XRCC1 and DNA ligase III alpha in a cell-cycle-specific manner.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Murshudov,
Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method.
1997,
Pubmed
Otwinowski,
Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode.
1997,
Pubmed
Schellman,
The thermodynamic stability of proteins.
1987,
Pubmed
Svergun,
Determination of domain structure of proteins from X-ray solution scattering.
2001,
Pubmed
Taylor,
Role of a BRCT domain in the interaction of DNA ligase III-alpha with the DNA repair protein XRCC1.
1998,
Pubmed
Thornton,
Expression, purification, and biophysical characterization of the BRCT domain of human DNA ligase IIIalpha.
2001,
Pubmed
Vidal,
XRCC1 coordinates the initial and late stages of DNA abasic site repair through protein-protein interactions.
2001,
Pubmed
Wang,
JWA regulates XRCC1 and functions as a novel base excision repair protein in oxidative-stress-induced DNA single-strand breaks.
2009,
Pubmed
Wang,
DNA ligase III as a candidate component of backup pathways of nonhomologous end joining.
2005,
Pubmed
Wu,
Structural and functional interaction between the human DNA repair proteins DNA ligase IV and XRCC4.
2009,
Pubmed
Zhang,
Structure of an XRCC1 BRCT domain: a new protein-protein interaction module.
1998,
Pubmed