Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Amphibians provide an ideal model to study the actions of thyroid hormone (TH) in animal development because TH signaling via two TH receptors, TRα and TRβ, is indispensable for amphibian metamorphosis. However, specific roles for the TRβ isoform in metamorphosis are poorly understood. To address this issue, we generated trβ-disrupted Xenopus tropicalis tadpoles using the CRISPR-Cas system. We first established a highly efficient and rapid workflow for gene disruption in the founder generation (F0) by injecting sgRNA and Cas9 ribonucleoprotein. Most embryos showed severe mutant phenotypes carrying high somatic mutation rates. Utilizing this founder analysis system, we examined the role of trβ in metamorphosis. trβ-disrupted pre-metamorphic tadpoles exhibited mixed responsiveness to exogenous TH. Specifically, gill resorption and activation of several TH-response genes, including trβ itself and two protease genes, were impaired. However, hind limb outgrowth and induction of the TH-response genes, klf9 and fra-2, were not affected by loss of trβ Surprisingly, trβ-disrupted tadpoles were able to undergo spontaneous metamorphosis normally, except for a slight delay in tail resorption. These results indicate TRβ is not required but contributes to the timing of resorptive events of metamorphosis.
Fig. 1. trβ sgRNA/Cas9 RNP leads to trβ gene disruption in X. tropicalis founders. (A) Schematic illustration of the sgRNA targeting sequences on the 2nd exon and 2nd intron of the trβ gene in X. tropicalis. One of the sgRNAs was designed in the coding region (trβ sgRNA-1) and the other was designed across the exon-intron junction (trβ sgRNA-2). Highlights in red and gray denote the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and the 20â bp target sequences of sgRNA, respectively. Exon and intron sequences are indicated by capital and small letters, respectively. (B) Genotyping by HMA in uninjected and injected embryos. PCR products encompassing sgRNA target sites were analyzed using a microchip electrophoresis system. Heteroduplex bands and multiple short bands are shown in the sgRNA/Cas9 RNP-injected embryos (crispants). Arrowheads, wild-type original bands; curly brackets, up-shifted heteroduplex bands; square brackets, deleted bands. (C) RT-PCR was performed using total RNA from stage 61/62 tadpoles with primers designed upstream and downstream of the 2nd exon. In addition to the original band (arrowhead), about 101â bp deleted bands were detected in crispants caused by skipping of the 2nd exon (asterisk) in trβ crispants. Heteroduplex bands were also detected in crispants (brackets). Each lane represents an individual animal. Ui, uninjected control.
Fig. 2. Amplicon sequencing analysis of on-target sites in trβ crispants. (A) Image of trβ crispants at stage 66. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole bodies of eight trβ crispants and the sgRNA target region was PCR-amplified using barcoded primers. PCR amplicons were subjected to amplicon sequencing according to Materials and Methods. Numbers indicate each crispant that was analyzed by amplicon sequencing in B. (B) The results of wild-type and mutant allele reads in each trβ crispant. All sequenced reads were classified into three groups; wild-type reads, frameshift and/or splice donor site mutation reads, in-frame mutation reads.
Fig. 3. Morphological changes induced by T3 treatment in trβ crispants. (A) Uninjected control tadpoles and trβ crispants at pre-metamorphic stage (stage 52â54) were treated with or without 10â nM T3 for 3â days and morphological changes observed. After 3â days of T3 treatment, regression of gills was observed in all uninjected control tadpoles (n=44/44), whereas these morphological changes were not induced in most of the trβ crispants (n=51/54). In contrast, morphological change did not occur in the gills of both uninjected control tadpoles and trβ crispants without T3 treatment. (B) Hind limb development was induced by T3 treatment in all uninjected control tadpoles (n=44/44) and trβ crispants (n=54/54). N values represent the total numbers of tadpoles in three independent experiments.
Fig. 4. Impaired induction of TH-response genes in trβ crispants. mRNA expression of five TH response genes, thyroid hormone receptor β (trβ), krüppel-like factor 9 (klf9), fos-related antigen-2 (fra-2), matrix metallopeptidase 13 (mmp13), and fibroblast activation protein alpha (fapa), was analyzed by qPCR. Uninjected control tadpoles and trβ crispants at pre-metamorphic stage (stage 52â54) were treated with or without 10â nM T3 for 3â days and at least four tadpoles were pooled per sample (n=3) in three independent experiments. The expression levels were normalized by rpl8. Expression changes by T3 induction were calculated relative to those of control animals without T3 treatment. Error bars represent ±s.d. (n=9). The three independent experiments exhibited similar trends. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the uninjected control and trβ crispants: *P<0.005; Welch's t-test.
Fig. 5. Delay of tail resorption in trβ crispants during natural metamorphosis. (A) The days from fertilization to stage 61 are indicated in a box plot for uninjected control tadpoles (n=46) and trβ crispants (n=39). There were no significant differences. (B) The days from stage 61 to stage 66 are indicated in a box plot for uninjected control tadpoles (n=45) and trβ crispants (n=38). trβ crispants required significantly more days to reach stage 66 (Welch's t-test, *P<0.05). N values represent the merged total numbers of tadpoles from two independent experiments. Box and whiskers show the interquartile range and maximum and minimum data points, respectively. (C) Time course of tail resorption in uninjected control tadpoles and trβ crispants. Uninjected control tadpoles and trβ crispants of the same age were selected from the same clutch at stage 61 and gill resorption observed at 1â days, 3â days, and 5â days after stage 61 (day 0). Uninjected control tadpoles completed tail resorption by day 5. In contrast, the tail remained in trβ crispants on day 5 (an arrowhead in the high magnification image) and a longer time was required to reach the end of metamorphosis.
Fig. 6. F1 trβ mutants accomplish natural metamorphosis. (A) Image of F1 offspring produced by mating of the F0 crispants. (B) Mutation sequences from each F1 offspring. PCR products of trβ target site from six F1 froglets were subcloned and sequenced. Sequences highlighted in red and gray denote protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and protospacer sequence, respectively. Splice donor site is underlined. The deleted and inserted nucleotides are shown by dashes and blue letters, respectively. Capital and small letters indicate exon and intron, respectively.
Bagamasbad,
A role for basic transcription element-binding protein 1 (BTEB1) in the autoinduction of thyroid hormone receptor beta.
2008, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Bagamasbad,
A role for basic transcription element-binding protein 1 (BTEB1) in the autoinduction of thyroid hormone receptor beta.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Berry,
The expression pattern of thyroid hormone response genes in remodeling tadpole tissues defines distinct growth and resorption gene expression programs.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Berry,
The expression pattern of thyroid hormone response genes in the tadpole tail identifies multiple resorption programs.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Blitz,
Biallelic genome modification in F(0) Xenopus tropicalis embryos using the CRISPR/Cas system.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Brent,
Mechanisms of thyroid hormone action.
2012,
Pubmed
Brown,
Amphibian metamorphosis.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Brown,
The thyroid hormone-induced tail resorption program during Xenopus laevis metamorphosis.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Buchholz,
Xenopus metamorphosis as a model to study thyroid hormone receptor function during vertebrate developmental transitions.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Buchholz,
A dominant-negative thyroid hormone receptor blocks amphibian metamorphosis by retaining corepressors at target genes.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Burger,
Maximizing mutagenesis with solubilized CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes.
2016,
Pubmed
Cheng,
Molecular aspects of thyroid hormone actions.
2010,
Pubmed
Choi,
Growth, Development, and Intestinal Remodeling Occurs in the Absence of Thyroid Hormone Receptor α in Tadpoles of Xenopus tropicalis.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Choi,
Unliganded thyroid hormone receptor α regulates developmental timing via gene repression in Xenopus tropicalis.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Das,
Gene expression changes at metamorphosis induced by thyroid hormone in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Denver,
Thyroid hormone receptor subtype specificity for hormone-dependent neurogenesis in Xenopus laevis.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Furlow,
A developmental switch induced by thyroid hormone: Xenopus laevis metamorphosis.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Furlow,
Induction of larval tissue resorption in Xenopus laevis tadpoles by the thyroid hormone receptor agonist GC-1.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Grimaldi,
Mechanisms of thyroid hormone receptor action during development: lessons from amphibian studies.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mullur,
Thyroid hormone regulation of metabolism.
2014,
Pubmed
Naert,
CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of rb1 and rbl1 leads to rapid and penetrant retinoblastoma development in Xenopus tropicalis.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Naito,
CRISPRdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites.
2015,
Pubmed
Nakayama,
Cas9-based genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nakayama,
Simple and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Xenopus tropicalis.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ocasio,
Design and characterization of a thyroid hormone receptor alpha (TRalpha)-specific agonist.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ortiga-Carvalho,
Thyroid hormone receptors and resistance to thyroid hormone disorders.
2014,
Pubmed
Ota,
Multiple genome modifications by the CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish.
2014,
Pubmed
Perlmann,
Determinants for selective RAR and TR recognition of direct repeat HREs.
1993,
Pubmed
Popp,
Leveraging Rules of Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay for Genome Engineering and Personalized Medicine.
2016,
Pubmed
Radev,
A TALEN-Exon Skipping Design for a Bethlem Myopathy Model in Zebrafish.
2015,
Pubmed
Ranjan,
Transcriptional repression of Xenopus TR beta gene is mediated by a thyroid hormone response element located near the start site.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sachs,
Targeted chromatin binding and histone acetylation in vivo by thyroid hormone receptor during amphibian development.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sakane,
A Simple Protocol for Loss-of-Function Analysis in Xenopus tropicalis Founders Using the CRISPR-Cas System.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Schreiber,
Diverse developmental programs of Xenopus laevis metamorphosis are inhibited by a dominant negative thyroid hormone receptor.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shi,
Dual functions of thyroid hormone receptors in vertebrate development: the roles of histone-modifying cofactor complexes.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shigeta,
Rapid and efficient analysis of gene function using CRISPR-Cas9 in Xenopus tropicalis founders.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tata,
Amphibian metamorphosis as a model for studying the developmental actions of thyroid hormone.
1999,
Pubmed
Tata,
Gene expression during metamorphosis: an ideal model for post-embryonic development.
1993,
Pubmed
Tsai,
Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members.
1994,
Pubmed
Untergasser,
Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces.
2012,
Pubmed
Wahli,
Superfamily of steroid nuclear receptors: positive and negative regulators of gene expression.
1991,
Pubmed
Wang,
Developmental regulation and function of thyroid hormone receptors and 9-cis retinoic acid receptors during Xenopus tropicalis metamorphosis.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wang,
Thyroid hormone-induced gene expression program for amphibian tail resorption.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Waung,
Thyroid hormone metabolism in skeletal development and adult bone maintenance.
2012,
Pubmed
Wen,
Thyroid Hormone Receptor α Controls Developmental Timing and Regulates the Rate and Coordination of Tissue-Specific Metamorphosis in Xenopus tropicalis.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wen,
Unliganded thyroid hormone receptor α controls developmental timing in Xenopus tropicalis.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wu,
Thyroid hormone response element sequence and the recruitment of retinoid X receptors for thyroid hormone responsiveness.
2001,
Pubmed
Yaoita,
A correlation of thyroid hormone receptor gene expression with amphibian metamorphosis.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yen,
Physiological and molecular basis of thyroid hormone action.
2001,
Pubmed