Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Dev Cell
2008 Sep 01;153:426-436. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.014.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Multiple kinesin motors coordinate cytoplasmic RNA transport on a subpopulation of microtubules in Xenopus oocytes.
Messitt TJ
,
Gagnon JA
,
Kreiling JA
,
Pratt CA
,
Yoon YJ
,
Mowry KL
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
RNA localization is a widely conserved mechanism for generating cellular asymmetry. In Xenopus oocytes, microtubule-dependent transport of RNAs to the vegetal cortex underlies germ layer patterning. Although kinesin motors have been implicated in this process, the apparent polarity of the microtubule cytoskeleton has pointed instead to roles for minus-end-directed motors. To resolve this issue, we have analyzed participation of kinesin motors in vegetal RNA transport and identified a direct role for Xenopus kinesin-1. Moreover, in vivo interference and biochemical experiments reveal a key function for multiple motors, specifically kinesin-1 and kinesin-2, and suggest that these motors may interact during transport. Critically, we have discovered a subpopulation of microtubules with plus ends at the vegetal cortex, supporting roles for these kinesin motors in vegetal RNA transport. These results provide a new mechanistic basis for understanding directed RNA transport within the cytoplasm.
Figure 1. Kinesin-1 Interacts with VLE RNA(A and B) Immunofluorescence was carried out using SUK4 antibodies on st. III oocytes injected with fluorescently labeled VLE RNA. Shown is a confocal section with kinesin-1 in green ([A]; αSUK4) and VLE RNA in red (Aâ²); the overlap of VLE RNA and SUK4 staining (Aâ²) is shown in white. (B) Higher-magnification view of VLE RNA and KHC colocalization (white) in the vegetal oocytecytoplasm. For (A) and (B), scale bars = 50 μm.(C) S10 lysates from oocytes injected with VLE or XβM RNA (lanes 1 and 4 show 10% of total) were immunoprecipitated with mouse IgG (lanes 2 and 5) or αSUK4 (lanes 3 and 6). Bound RNA was detected by RT-PCR using primers for VLE (lanes 1â3) or XβM (lanes 4â6).(D) S10 lysates from uninjected oocytes were immunoprecipitated with mouse IgG (lanes 2 and 5) or αSUK4 (lanes 3 and 6). Bound RNA was detected by RT-PCR using primers for Vg1 (lanes 1â3) or EF1α (lanes 4â6). Lanes 1 and 4 show 20% of total input RNA.
Figure 2. Kinesin-1 Has a Role in Vegetal RNA Transport(AâC) Confocal images of representative oocytes injected with fluorescently labeled VLE RNA following injection with (A) IgG (control), (B) αSUK2 (non-function-blocking KHC antibody), or (C) αSUK4 (function-blocking αKHC) antibodies. Scale bars = 50 μm.(D) Quantification of antibody interference results. Oocytes were analyzed for VLE RNA localization by confocal microscopy, with percent of oocytes exhibiting localization scored relative to the IgG control, which was set to 100%.
Figure 3. Kinesin-1 Rigor Mutation Disrupts Vegetal RNA Transport(AâE) Alexa-546-labeled VLE RNA was injected into oocytes expressing (A) no exogenous protein (control, n = 311), (B) kinesin-1 heavy chain (XKHC, n = 253), (C) kinesin-1 rigor mutant (XKHC-T92I, n = 260), (D) Eg5 (XEg5, n = 116), or (E) Eg5 rigor mutant (XEg5-T105N, n = 123), all injected at 500 nM. Representative confocal images of the vegetal hemisphere cytoplasm are shown; scale bars = 50 μm.(F) Comparison of the percentage of oocytes (gray bars, ± SD) exhibiting vegetal localization scored relative to the average for control oocytes (A), which was set to 100%.
Figure 4. The Kinesin-1 Rigor Mutation Has an Intermediate Phenotype that May Provide Insight into Kinesin-1 Function(A and B) Oocytes were injected with either (A) XKHC-FLAG or (B) XKHC-T92I-FLAG at 125 nM. After 16 hr expression, fluorescently labeled VLE RNA was injected, and localization was assayed after 8 hr by confocal microscopy. Representative images are shown for the ânormalâ phenotype (A) and âintermediateâ phenotype (B), with the vegetal hemisphere toward the bottom.(C and D) Oocytes were injected with either (C) XKHC-encoding or (D) XKHC-T92I-encoding RNAs at 500 nM, followed by injection of fluorescently labeled VLE RNA. Oocytes were harvested at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hr, and localization was assayed as above. Representative images of the vegetal cytoplasm are shown.(E and F) Oocytes were injected with (E) XKlp3b-encoding or (F) XKlp3b-T103I-encoding RNAs at 125 nM, and assayed for VLE localization as in (A) and (B).(G) Oocytes (from [A], [B], [E], and [F]) were scored for localization by confocal microscopy, and the percentage that exhibited the intermediate rigor phenotype is indicated, along with the number of oocytes (n) assayed.For (A)â(F), scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 6. Markers of Microtubule Polarity Reveal a Vegetal Population of Plus Ends(A and B) Immunofluorescence was performed on st. III oocytes using (A) EB1 antibodies or (B) no primary antibody. (C) Depiction of vegetal views shown in (A), (B), (D), (E), and (I). The optical section, 10â25 μm from the vegetal pole, is depicted as a gray grid relative to the oocyte animal-vegetal axis. (DâF) Immunofluorescence was performed on st. III oocytes using both EB1 and α-tubulin antibodies. (D) An optical section shows EB1 in green (D) and α-tubulin in red (Dâ²). (E) Colocalization of EB1 (green) and microtubules (red), viewed at high magnification (scale bar = 5 μm). Arrowheads point to examples of microtubule ends colocalized with EB1. (F) An optical section, with the vegetal pole oriented toward the bottom, shows α-tubulin in red (F) and EB1 in green (Fâ²). Arrowhead points to a microtubule end colocalized with EB1; scale bar = 2 μm. (G) Immunofluorescence was performed on st. III oocytes using γ-tubulin antibodies. A cross-section through the vegetal cytoplasm is shown, with the vegetal pole at the bottom. (H) Immunofluorescence was performed on Alexa 546 VLE-injected oocytes using EB1 antibodies. An optical cross-section of the vegetal cytoplasm is shown, with the vegetal pole at the bottom. EB1 is shown in green (H), VLE RNA is shown in red (Hâ²), and the overlap of VLE RNA and EB1 is visualized in white (Hâ²). (I) Vegetal view (as in [C]) of EB1 and VLE colocalization in a st. III oocyte. EB1 is shown in green (I), VLE RNA is shown in red (Iâ²), and VLE RNA and EB1 overlap is shown in white (Iâ²). (J) An optical cross-section of the animal hemisphere from (H) is shown, with VLE RNA as red (J) and EB1 as green (Jâ²). Scale bars represent 50 μm (A, B, D, and GâJ), 5 μm (E), or 2 μm (F).
Alarcón,
RNA anchoring in the vegetal cortex of the Xenopus oocyte.
2001, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Alarcón,
RNA anchoring in the vegetal cortex of the Xenopus oocyte.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Aronov,
Visualization of translated tau protein in the axons of neuronal P19 cells and characterization of tau RNP granules.
2002,
Pubmed
Berliner,
Failure of a single-headed kinesin to track parallel to microtubule protofilaments.
1995,
Pubmed
Betley,
Kinesin II mediates Vg1 mRNA transport in Xenopus oocytes.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Birsoy,
Vg 1 is an essential signaling molecule in Xenopus development.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Blangy,
Rigor-type mutation in the kinesin-related protein HsEg5 changes its subcellular localization and induces microtubule bundling.
1998,
Pubmed
Brendza,
A function for kinesin I in the posterior transport of oskar mRNA and Staufen protein.
2000,
Pubmed
Bullock,
Guidance of bidirectional motor complexes by mRNA cargoes through control of dynein number and activity.
2006,
Pubmed
Bullock,
Translocation of mRNAs by molecular motors: think complex?
2007,
Pubmed
Carson,
Translocation of myelin basic protein mRNA in oligodendrocytes requires microtubules and kinesin.
1997,
Pubmed
Cha,
Kinesin I-dependent cortical exclusion restricts pole plasm to the oocyte posterior.
2002,
Pubmed
Cole,
Novel heterotrimeric kinesin-related protein purified from sea urchin eggs.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Condeelis,
How and why does beta-actin mRNA target?
2005,
Pubmed
Cote,
A Xenopus protein related to hnRNP I has a role in cytoplasmic RNA localization.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Czaplinski,
40LoVe interacts with Vg1RBP/Vera and hnRNP I in binding the Vg1-localization element.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dale,
Secretion and mesoderm-inducing activity of the TGF-beta-related domain of Xenopus Vg1.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
De Marco,
Analysis of heterodimer formation by Xklp3A/B, a newly cloned kinesin-II from Xenopus laevis.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Deshler,
A highly conserved RNA-binding protein for cytoplasmic mRNA localization in vertebrates.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Diefenbach,
The C-terminal region of the stalk domain of ubiquitous human kinesin heavy chain contains the binding site for kinesin light chain.
1998,
Pubmed
Du,
Why cells move messages: the biological functions of mRNA localization.
2007,
Pubmed
Duncan,
The cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin motors have interdependent roles in patterning the Drosophila oocyte.
2002,
Pubmed
Gelfand,
A dominant negative approach for functional studies of the kinesin II complex.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Glotzer,
Cytoplasmic flows localize injected oskar RNA in Drosophila oocytes.
1997,
Pubmed
Havin,
RNA-binding protein conserved in both microtubule- and microfilament-based RNA localization.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hirokawa,
mRNA transport in dendrites: RNA granules, motors, and tracks.
2006,
Pubmed
Houliston,
The kinesin-related protein Eg5 associates with both interphase and spindle microtubules during Xenopus early development.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ingold,
Inhibition of kinesin-driven microtubule motility by monoclonal antibodies to kinesin heavy chains.
1988,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Januschke,
Polar transport in the Drosophila oocyte requires Dynein and Kinesin I cooperation.
2002,
Pubmed
Kanai,
Kinesin transports RNA: isolation and characterization of an RNA-transporting granule.
2004,
Pubmed
King,
Putting RNAs in the right place at the right time: RNA localization in the frog oocyte.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kloc,
RNA localization mechanisms in oocytes.
2005,
Pubmed
Kress,
Nuclear RNP complex assembly initiates cytoplasmic RNA localization.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lane,
Microtubule-based endoplasmic reticulum motility in Xenopus laevis: activation of membrane-associated kinesin during development.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lawrence,
A standardized kinesin nomenclature.
2004,
Pubmed
Le Bot,
Role of xklp3, a subunit of the Xenopus kinesin II heterotrimeric complex, in membrane transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Levi,
Organelle transport along microtubules in Xenopus melanophores: evidence for cooperation between multiple motors.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Miki,
Analysis of the kinesin superfamily: insights into structure and function.
2005,
Pubmed
Mimori-Kiyosue,
The dynamic behavior of the APC-binding protein EB1 on the distal ends of microtubules.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Minakhina,
Axes formation and RNA localization.
2005,
Pubmed
Mische,
Direct observation of regulated ribonucleoprotein transport across the nurse cell/oocyte boundary.
2007,
Pubmed
Mowry,
Vegetal messenger RNA localization directed by a 340-nt RNA sequence element in Xenopus oocytes.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mowry,
Complex formation between stage-specific oocyte factors and a Xenopus mRNA localization element.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nakata,
Point mutation of adenosine triphosphate-binding motif generated rigor kinesin that selectively blocks anterograde lysosome membrane transport.
1995,
Pubmed
Niethammer,
Discrete states of a protein interaction network govern interphase and mitotic microtubule dynamics.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ohashi,
Identification of mRNA/protein (mRNP) complexes containing Puralpha, mStaufen, fragile X protein, and myosin Va and their association with rough endoplasmic reticulum equipped with a kinesin motor.
2002,
Pubmed
Palacios,
How does an mRNA find its way? Intracellular localisation of transcripts.
2007,
Pubmed
Palacios,
Kinesin light chain-independent function of the Kinesin heavy chain in cytoplasmic streaming and posterior localisation in the Drosophila oocyte.
2002,
Pubmed
Pfeiffer,
Microtubules in Xenopus oocytes are oriented with their minus-ends towards the cortex.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Stearns,
Gamma-tubulin is a highly conserved component of the centrosome.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
St Johnston,
Moving messages: the intracellular localization of mRNAs.
2005,
Pubmed
Thomsen,
Processed Vg1 protein is an axial mesoderm inducer in Xenopus.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tuma,
Heterotrimeric kinesin II is the microtubule motor protein responsible for pigment dispersion in Xenopus melanophores.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vale,
The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport.
2003,
Pubmed
Vershinin,
Multiple-motor based transport and its regulation by Tau.
2007,
Pubmed
Wedaman,
Sequence and submolecular localization of the 115-kD accessory subunit of the heterotrimeric kinesin-II (KRP85/95) complex.
1996,
Pubmed
Weeks,
A maternal mRNA localized to the vegetal hemisphere in Xenopus eggs codes for a growth factor related to TGF-beta.
1987,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wright,
Roles of kinesin and kinesin-like proteins in sea urchin embryonic cell division: evaluation using antibody microinjection.
1993,
Pubmed
Wright,
Subcellular localization and sequence of sea urchin kinesin heavy chain: evidence for its association with membranes in the mitotic apparatus and interphase cytoplasm.
1991,
Pubmed
Yang,
A three-domain structure of kinesin heavy chain revealed by DNA sequence and microtubule binding analyses.
1989,
Pubmed
Yisraeli,
A two-step model for the localization of maternal mRNA in Xenopus oocytes: involvement of microtubules and microfilaments in the translocation and anchoring of Vg1 mRNA.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yoon,
Xenopus Staufen is a component of a ribonucleoprotein complex containing Vg1 RNA and kinesin.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase