Sindelka R et al. (2018), Asymmetric distribution of biomolecules of mate...

XB-ART-54969

Sci Rep 2018 May 29;81:8315. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26592-1.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Asymmetric distribution of biomolecules of maternal origin in the Xenopus laevis egg and their impact on the developmental plan.

Sindelka R , Abaffy P , Qu Y , Tomankova S , Sidova M , Naraine R , Kolar M , Peuchen E , Sun L , Dovichi N , Kubista M .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Asymmetric cell division is a ubiquitous feature during the development of higher organisms. Asymmetry is achieved by differential localization or activities of biological molecules such as proteins, and coding and non-coding RNAs. Here, we present subcellular transcriptomic and proteomic analyses along the animal-vegetal axis of Xenopus laevis eggs. More than 98% of the maternal mRNAs could be categorized into four localization profile groups: animal, vegetal, extremely vegetal, and a newly described group of mRNAs that we call extremely animal, which are mRNAs enriched in the animal cortex region. 3'UTRs of localized mRNAs were analyzed for localization motifs. Several putative motifs were discovered for vegetal and extremely vegetal mRNAs, while no distinct conserved motifs for the extremely animal mRNAs were identified, suggesting different localization mechanisms. Asymmetric profiles were also found for proteins, with correlation to those of corresponding mRNAs. Based on unexpected observation of the profiles of the homoeologous genes exd2 we propose a possible mechanism of genetic evolution.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 29844480
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC5974320
???displayArticle.link??? Sci Rep
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: acsl6 akt1 ankrd10 armc8 atp1a1 atp2a3 atp5f1a atp6v0a2 bco2 cdk1 cirbp cox6c crem ctdspl ctsc cyb5b dad1 dand5 dazl ddx25 ddx4 eef1b2 eif2a eif3a eif4b epcam exd2 fis1 fn1 foxi2 germes gk glod4 grip2 hnrnpa3 hprt1 hsp90aa1.1 ifrd2 inpp1 itm2a jun lima1 map3k1 mcts1 mrpl1 mrpl11 mrps10 mtcl2 naga nanos1 nox1 nqo1 otx1 pgam1 pgat plin2 ppp2r5a prpsap2 prrg2 psma6 raver1 rbm6 rnf38 rpl14 rras2 sdhc slc13a4l slc18a2 slc66a2 sod1 sox7 sybu thap4 tmem62 trim36 ube3a vat1 vcl vegt velo1 vps35 wnk2 wnt11b zfyve28a

???displayArticle.gses??? GSE104848: Xenbase, NCBI

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

References [+] :

Anders, Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. 2010, Pubmed

	Figure 1. Classification of the studied biomolecules into localization categories based on their intracellular profiles. Experimental scheme (A). Classification of 15005 mRNAs (B), classification of 3409 proteins (C) and classification of 247 long noncoding RNAs (D).
	Figure 2. Intracellular profiles for selected extremely animal (A), animal (B), vegetal (C) and extremely vegetal (D) mRNAs. Predicted functions based on gene ontology (GO) analysis (E). Scheme of A-V sectioning (F).
	Figure 3. Animal mRNAs become evenly distributed along the A-V axis at blastula stage (A), while extremely animal, vegetal, and extremely vegetal mRNAs remain asymmetrically distributed at blastula stage (B).
	Figure 4. Scheme for the identification of localization motifs (A). Cluster analysis of the animal localization motifs identified using MEME (A1M-A27M) and GIBBS (A3G-A26G). Heatmap indicates the proportion of motifs and the numbers the percentage of the 3â²UTRs that contains the motifs (B).
	Figure 5. Cluster analysis and motif validation for the motifs behind vegetal localization identified using MEME (V1M-V36M), GIBBS (V3G-V33G) and DREME (V2D-V41D). Heatmap indicates proportion of motifs and numbers reflect percentage of 3â²UTRs containing at least one copy of a motif (B).
	Figure 6. Analysis of homoeologous genes that show contrasting polarization. Out of more than 3500 homoeologous maternally expressed genes less than 100 showed different localization of its L and S versions. (A) Localization profiles of the L and S versions of naga, zfyve28 and exd2 (Bâ€“D). Presence of vegetal localization motifs UUCAC and UGCAC in the 3â€²UTRs of naga, zfyve28 and exd2 (E).
	Figure 7. Proteome profiling along the A-V axis of Xenopus laevis eggs. Schematic showing the experimental design (A). Protein localization and comparison with mRNA (B). Selected candidates with similar/different localization at mRNA/protein levels with known interesting biological functions (C). Comparison of protein localization at egg and blastula (D). Examples of egg and blastula specific proteins (E).
	Figure 8. Scheme proposing altered gene function development based on species hybridization followed by asymmetric localization and modification of coding sequence.