Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
J R Soc Interface
2013 Jul 06;1084:20130236. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0236.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Built for rowing: frog muscle is tuned to limb morphology to power swimming.
Richards CT
,
Clemente CJ
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Rowing is demanding, in part, because drag on the oars increases as the square of their speed. Hence, as muscles shorten faster, their force capacity falls, whereas drag rises. How do frogs resolve this dilemma to swim rapidly? We predicted that shortening velocity cannot exceed a terminal velocity where muscle and fluid torques balance. This terminal velocity, which is below Vmax, depends on gear ratio (GR = outlever/inlever) and webbed foot area. Perhaps such properties of swimmers are 'tuned', enabling shortening speeds of approximately 0.3Vmax for maximal power. Predictions were tested using a 'musculo-robotic' Xenopus laevis foot driven either by a living in vitro or computational in silico plantaris longus muscle. Experiments verified predictions. Our principle finding is that GR ranges from 11.5 to 20 near the predicted optimum for rowing (GR ≈ 11). However, gearing influences muscle power more strongly than foot area. No single morphology is optimal for producing muscle power. Rather, the 'optimal' GR decreases with foot size, implying that rowing ability need not compromise jumping (and vice versa). Thus, despite our neglect of additional forces (e.g. added mass), our model predicts pairings of physiological and morphological properties to confer effective rowing. Beyond frogs, the model may apply across a range of size and complexity from aquatic insects to human-powered rowing.
Aerts,
Environmentally induced mechanical feedback in locomotion: frog performance as a model.
2009, Pubmed
Aerts,
Environmentally induced mechanical feedback in locomotion: frog performance as a model.
2009,
Pubmed
Askew,
Optimal shortening velocity (V/Vmax) of skeletal muscle during cyclical contractions: length-force effects and velocity-dependent activation and deactivation.
1998,
Pubmed
Astley,
Evidence for a vertebrate catapult: elastic energy storage in the plantaris tendon during frog jumping.
2012,
Pubmed
Azizi,
Muscle performance during frog jumping: influence of elasticity on muscle operating lengths.
2010,
Pubmed
Clemente,
Determining the influence of muscle operating length on muscle performance during frog swimming using a bio-robotic model.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Clemente,
Muscle function and hydrodynamics limit power and speed in swimming frogs.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Daniel,
Invertebrate swimming: integrating internal and external mechanics.
1995,
Pubmed
Galantis,
The theoretical limits to the power output of a muscle-tendon complex with inertial and gravitational loads.
2003,
Pubmed
Gordon,
The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres.
1966,
Pubmed
Herrel,
Trade-offs between burst performance and maximal exertion capacity in a wild amphibian, Xenopus tropicalis.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Johansson,
Hydrodynamics of surface swimming in leopard frogs (Rana pipiens).
2004,
Pubmed
Kargo,
Functional morphology of proximal hindlimb muscles in the frog Rana pipiens.
2002,
Pubmed
Lee,
EMG analysis tuned for determining the timing and level of activation in different motor units.
2011,
Pubmed
Lieber,
Sarcomere length-joint angle relationships of seven frog hindlimb muscles.
1992,
Pubmed
Lutz,
Built for jumping: the design of the frog muscular system.
1994,
Pubmed
Marsh,
Jumping ability of anuran amphibians.
1994,
Pubmed
Moon,
Energetics and power output of isolated fish fast muscle fibres performing oscillatory work.
1991,
Pubmed
Moore,
Artificial intelligence programming with LabVIEW: genetic algorithms for instrumentation control and optimization.
1995,
Pubmed
Nauwelaerts,
Morphological correlates of aquatic and terrestrial locomotion in a semi-aquatic frog, Rana esculenta: no evidence for a design conflict.
2007,
Pubmed
Nauwelaerts,
Propulsive force calculations in swimming frogs. I. A momentum-impulse approach.
2005,
Pubmed
Nelson,
Force-velocity properties of two avian hindlimb muscles.
2004,
Pubmed
Otten,
A myocybernetic model of the jaw system of the rat.
1987,
Pubmed
Richards,
A bio-robotic platform for integrating internal and external mechanics during muscle-powered swimming.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Richards,
Modulation of in vivo muscle power output during swimming in the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis).
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Richards,
The kinematic determinants of anuran swimming performance: an inverse and forward dynamics approach.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Richards,
Building a robotic link between muscle dynamics and hydrodynamics.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Richards,
Kinematics and hydrodynamics analysis of swimming anurans reveals striking inter-specific differences in the mechanism for producing thrust.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Roberts,
Probing the limits to muscle-powered accelerations: lessons from jumping bullfrogs.
2003,
Pubmed
Tu,
Submaximal power output from the dorsolongitudinal flight muscles of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta.
2004,
Pubmed
Van Wassenbergh,
Extremely fast prey capture in pipefish is powered by elastic recoil.
2008,
Pubmed