Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Biochem J
2012 Aug 15;4461:135-48. doi: 10.1042/BJ20120307.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Intestinal peptidases form functional complexes with the neutral amino acid transporter B(0)AT1.
Fairweather SJ
,
Bröer A
,
O'Mara ML
,
Bröer S
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The brush-border membrane of the small intestine and kidneyproximal tubule are the major sites for the absorption and re-absorption of nutrients in the body respectively. Transport of amino acids is mediated through the action of numerous secondary active transporters. In the mouse, neutral amino acids are transported by B(0)AT1 [broad neutral ((0)) amino acid transporter 1; SLC6A19 (solute carrier family 6 member 19)] in the intestine and by B(0)AT1 and B(0)AT3 (SLC6A18) in the kidney. Immunoprecipitation and Blue native electrophoresis of intestinal brush-border membrane proteins revealed that B(0)AT1 forms complexes with two peptidases, APN (aminopeptidase N/CD13) and ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2). Physiological characterization of B(0)AT1 expressed together with these peptidases in Xenopus laevis oocytes revealed that APN increased the substrate affinity of the transporter up to 2.5-fold and also increased its surface expression (V(max)). Peptide competition experiments, in silico modelling and site-directed mutagenesis of APN suggest that the catalytic site of the peptidase is involved in the observed changes of B(0)AT1 apparent substrate affinity, possibly by increasing the local substrate concentration. These results provide evidence for the existence of B(0)AT1-containing digestive complexes in the brush-border membrane, interacting differentially with various peptidases, and responding to the dynamic needs of nutrient absorption in the intestine and kidney.
Figure 1. Isolation of intestinal brush-border protein complexesMurine intestinal BBMVs were prepared using MgCl2 precipitation and centrifugation. (A) BBMVs (50 μg/sample) at 1 mg/ml were solubilized in detergent buffer as indicated and mixed with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 loading dye before separation. Samples were separated by Blue native PAGE. Following semi-dry transfer on to a PVDF membrane, individual proteins were detected by immunoblot analysis. The blot was stripped and re-probed for the proteins indicated, to allow a direct comparison of band positions. Protein complexes and individual proteins are numbered 1â7 (discussed in the main text). (B) Murine BBMVs were solubilized in co-immunoprecipitation buffer, followed by incubation with Protein A and primary antibodies against either B0AT1 or APN. After overnight incubation of BBMV samples, the cleared lysate and intestinal homogenate were separated by SDS/PAGE. Following semi-dry transfer on to a nitrocellulose membrane, the blots were pre-stripped using stripping buffer and blocked overnight to reduce background signal. Individual proteins were then detected as indicated above the blot and visualized using immunoblot analysis. Molecular masses are indicated to the left-hand side in kDa.
Figure 2. Co-localization of B0AT1 and APNHEK-293 cells in eight-well microscope slide dishes were transfected with plasmid DNA (constructs used are indicated on the left-hand side) when cells had achieved >90% confluency. The eGFP fluorescence was visualized with a Leica SP5 confocal system and processed with LAS AF software. Indicated above the panels is whether or not cells were co-transfected with the pcDNA mammalian expression vector encoding the trafficking protein collectrin. The white scale bars indicate 25 μm. All images were taken at Ã63 magnification.
Figure 3. Effect of APN on B0AT1 transport activityOocytes were injected with 10 ng of B0AT1 cRNA, 15 ng of APN cRNA or 10 ng of ACE2 cRNA. (A) Uptake of 100 μM [14C]leucine was measured over 30 min on day 5 post-injection. Oocyte endogenous [14C]leucine uptake has been subtracted from all conditions. Each bar represents the means±S.D. (n=8â10, e=3). Note that there is a break in the ordinate axis between 50 and 150 pmol/30 min per oocyte. (B) Oocytes were voltage-clamped at â50 mV and subsequently superfused with 10 mM leucine or Leu-Ser-Lys-Leu tetrapeptide. Substrate-induced Na+ currents were recorded on day 5 post-injection for all oocytes, except for those co-injected with B0AT1 and collectrin, which were recorded on day 3 or 4 post-injection. Each tracing is a typical example of currents observed in all oocytes injected with the cRNA indicated. (C) Oocyte substrate-induced Na+ currents were recorded as described in (B) and superfused with 10 mM leucine. (D) Concurrent uptake and electrophysiological experiments were conducted under the same conditions as in (A) and (B), with uptake experiments using 100 μM [14C]leucine and electrophysiology 10 mM unlabelled leucine. Uptake and currents under control conditions was set to 1. Each data point represents the mean±S.D. (n=6â10, e=3).
Figure 4. Changes in B0AT1 transporter kinetics by APN and ACE2Oocytes were injected with combinations of the following amounts of cRNA: B0AT1, 10 ng; APN, 15 ng; ACE2, 10 ng; and collectrin, 2 ng. Leucine-induced Na+ currents were recorded on day 5 post-injection, except those co-injected with B0AT1 and ACE2, which were recorded on day 3 or 4 post-injection. (A) Oocytes were voltage-clamped at â50 mV and subsequently superfused with serial concentrations of leucine (0.1â10 mM) in descending and then ascending order. B0AT1-expressing oocytes were not superfused with 0.1 mM leucine due to a low signal to noise ratio elicited at this concentration. An EadieâHofstee linear regression plot of the data points is shown. Each data point represents the mean±S.D. (n=6â8, e=3). (B) Uptake of 100 μM [14C]leucine was measured over 15 min on days 1â6 post-injection. Oocyte endogenous [14C]leucine uptake has been subtracted. Each data point represents the mean±S.D. (n=8â12, e=3). (C) A total of 15 oocytes per sample were incubated in 0.5 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin on day 5 post-injection before being lysed and treated with streptavadin-coated agarose beads. Samples were separated by SDS/PAGE, blotted, detected and visualized for B0AT1 using immunoblot analysis. (D) A total of 15 oocytes per sample were prepared as in (C). Following SDS/PAGE, proteins were detected and visualized using immunoblot analysis for APN. Membranes were prepared for detection of subsequent proteins by stripping, re-blocking and re-probing of the protein indicated. Molecular masses are indicated to the left-hand side in kDa. (E) Oocytes were voltage-clamped at â50 mV and subsequently superfused with 20 mM of the amino acid (AA) indicated. All substrate-induced currents were normalized to a 20 mM leucine current (ILeu) to account for transporter de-sensitization. Each bar represents the mean±S.D. (n=6â8, e=3).
Figure 5. Mechanism of APN-mediated increase in substrate affinity of B0AT1Oocytes were injected with 10 ng of B0AT1 cRNA, 15 ng of APN cRNA and 2 ng of collectrin cRNA. (A) Oocytes were voltage clamped at â50 mV and subsequently superfused with either 200 μM leucine or 1 mM Leu-Ser-Lys-Leu tetrapeptide. Leucine-induced sodium currents were recorded 4â6 days post-injection. All Na+ currents were normalized to the sodium currents elicited by 200 μM leucine (ILeu) at 100%. Each bar represents the mean±S.D. (n=6â8, e=3). (B) Oocytes were recorded as indicated in (A) and superfused with either 200 μM leucine or 1 mM leucine tripeptide. All Na+ currents were normalized to the Na+ currents elicited by 200 μM leucine (ILeu) at 100%. Each bar represents the mean±S.D. (n=18).
Figure 6. Mechanism of APN-mediated increase in substrate affinity of B0AT1Oocytes were injected with either 10 ng of B0AT1 cRNA or 15 ng of APN cRNA. Uptake of [14C]leucine was measured over 30 min on day 5 post-injection. Bestatin (70 μM) was pre-incubated for 1 min before leucine was added. Oocyte endogenous leucine transport has been subtracted in all experimental conditions. Uptake was normalized to that measured in oocytes expressing B0AT1 alone in the presence of 100 μM leucine. Each bar represents the mean±S.E.M. of data combined from four experiments (n=33â38).
Figure 7. Homology model of mouse APNThe homology model of mouse APN was generated using HHpred Homology detection and structure prediction tool (Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology; http://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/hhpred) and visualized using PyMOL v9.9 (DeLano Scientific; http://www.pymol.org). Depicted are E. coli LAP (PDB code 3B34) (A) and murine APN (B) with phenylalanine bound to their active site. The top panels display a lateral three-dimensional view of the murine and E. coli structures. Domains are shaded as follows: magenta (domain I for E. coli, domain IV for mouse); green (domain II for E. coli, domain V for mouse); cyan (domain III for E. coli, domain VI for mouse); and yellow (domain IV for E. coli, domain VII for mouse). Domains IâIII from mouse APN are not depicted (residues 1 to 89) as no homologous sequence exists in E. coli for these. The HEXXHâ¦â¦â¦.BXLXE and GXMEN consensus sequences for zinc and amino acid binding are shaded red and orange respectively. The zinc ion is shaded blue-grey. The active sites of E. coli LAP and murine APN are depicted in panels (C) and (D) respectively. The zinc ion is shaded blue-grey, and the bound phenylalanine is depicted as a space-filled model, with oxygen and nitrogen atoms coloured red and blue respectively. All residues predicted to bind and interact with the substrate are shown and labelled.
Figure 8. Sequence alignments of aminopeptidase family membersPotential homologues of mouse APN (P97449) were identified by a NCBI blastp search. Peptide sequences were aligned using COBALT (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/cobalt/cobalt.cgi?CMD=Web). Highly conserved regions are boxed. In the consensus sequence row, X is any amino acid and B is bulky side chain neutral amino acids. The full-length aligned sequence from E. coli LAP (not shown) was used as the basis for the homology modelling of mouse APN. The three conserved residues in the binding domains of murine APN selected for site-directed mutagenesis are indicated with a vertical line above them, a fourth mutated residue, Tyr476, is not shown. AAP1, alanine/arginine aminopeptidase 1; LTA4, leukotriene A-4 hydrolase.
Figure 9. Mechanism of APN-mediated increase in substrate affinity of B0AT1Oocytes were injected with either 10 ng of B0AT1 cRNA, 15 ng of APN cRNA or 2 ng of collectrin cRNA. (A) Oocytes were voltage clamped at â50 mV and subsequently superfused with either 10 mM leucine or 10 mM Leu-Ser-Lys-Leu tetrapeptide. Each tracing is a typical example of currents observed in all oocytes injected with the cRNA indicated. Leucine-induced sodium currents were recorded on day 4 and 5 post-injection for all oocytes. (B) Oocytes were recorded as indicated in (A). Each data point indicates an APN mutant co-expressed with B0AT1, or B0AT1 co-expressed with collectrin. All peptide-induced sodium currents were normalized to the corresponding leucine-induced Na+ current (IPep/ILeu). Each data point represents the mean±S.D. for both peptide-induced sodium currents and apparent Km values. The trend line was fitted using linear regression (r=â0.84, P=0.035 and n=74). (C) A total of 15 oocytes/sample were incubated in 0.5 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-LC-biotin on day 5 post-injection before being lysed and treated with streptavadin-coated agarose beads. Samples were separated by SDS/PAGE. Subsequently B0AT1 was detected by immunoblotting. Molecular masses are indicated to the left-hand side in kDa.
Addlagatta,
Structural basis for the unusual specificity of Escherichia coli aminopeptidase N.
2008, Pubmed
Addlagatta,
Structural basis for the unusual specificity of Escherichia coli aminopeptidase N.
2008,
Pubmed
Addlagatta,
Structure of aminopeptidase N from Escherichia coli suggests a compartmentalized, gated active site.
2006,
Pubmed
Alfalah,
O-linked glycans mediate apical sorting of human intestinal sucrase-isomaltase through association with lipid rafts.
1999,
Pubmed
Alfalah,
Intestinal dipeptidyl peptidase IV is efficiently sorted to the apical membrane through the concerted action of N- and O-glycans as well as association with lipid microdomains.
2002,
Pubmed
Babusiak,
Native proteomic analysis of protein complexes in murine intestinal brush border membranes.
2007,
Pubmed
Biber,
Isolation of renal proximal tubular brush-border membranes.
2007,
Pubmed
Böhmer,
Characterization of mouse amino acid transporter B0AT1 (slc6a19).
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Braccia,
Microvillar membrane microdomains exist at physiological temperature. Role of galectin-4 as lipid raft stabilizer revealed by "superrafts".
2003,
Pubmed
Bröer,
Amino acid transport across mammalian intestinal and renal epithelia.
2008,
Pubmed
Bröer,
The role of the neutral amino acid transporter B0AT1 (SLC6A19) in Hartnup disorder and protein nutrition.
2009,
Pubmed
Bröer,
Molecular cloning of mouse amino acid transport system B0, a neutral amino acid transporter related to Hartnup disorder.
2004,
Pubmed
Brown,
Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface.
1992,
Pubmed
Camargo,
Tissue-specific amino acid transporter partners ACE2 and collectrin differentially interact with hartnup mutations.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Camargo,
Steady-state kinetic characterization of the mouse B(0)AT1 sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Danielsen,
Involvement of detergent-insoluble complexes in the intracellular transport of intestinal brush border enzymes.
1995,
Pubmed
Danielsen,
Lipid raft organization and function in the small intestinal brush border.
2008,
Pubmed
Danielsen,
A transferrin-like GPI-linked iron-binding protein in detergent-insoluble noncaveolar microdomains at the apical surface of fetal intestinal epithelial cells.
1995,
Pubmed
Danielsen,
Galectin-4 and small intestinal brush border enzymes form clusters.
1997,
Pubmed
Higgins,
ABC transporters: physiology, structure and mechanism--an overview.
2001,
Pubmed
Hooper,
Families of zinc metalloproteases.
1994,
Pubmed
Ihara,
Enhancement of brush border membrane peptidase activity in rat jejunum induced by starvation.
2000,
Pubmed
Ito,
Crystal structure of aminopeptidase N (proteobacteria alanyl aminopeptidase) from Escherichia coli and conformational change of methionine 260 involved in substrate recognition.
2006,
Pubmed
Kowalczuk,
A protein complex in the brush-border membrane explains a Hartnup disorder allele.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lee,
The ABC of binding-protein-dependent transport in Archaea.
2007,
Pubmed
Li,
Na+-H+ exchanger 3 (NHE3) is present in lipid rafts in the rabbit ileal brush border: a role for rafts in trafficking and rapid stimulation of NHE3.
2001,
Pubmed
Lottenberg,
Solution composition dependent variation in extinction coefficients for p-nitroaniline.
1983,
Pubmed
Maloney,
Energy coupling to ATP synthesis by the proton-translocating ATPase.
1982,
Pubmed
Mentlein,
Cell-surface peptidases.
2004,
Pubmed
Mina-Osorio,
The moonlighting enzyme CD13: old and new functions to target.
2008,
Pubmed
Mirre,
Detergent-resistant membrane microdomains from Caco-2 cells do not contain caveolin.
1996,
Pubmed
Mourad,
Amino acids in the rat intestinal lumen regulate their own absorption from a distant intestinal site.
2009,
Pubmed
Nguyen,
Proteomic characterization of lipid rafts markers from the rat intestinal brush border.
2006,
Pubmed
Nickitenko,
2 A resolution structure of DppA, a periplasmic dipeptide transport/chemosensory receptor.
1995,
Pubmed
O'Connell,
Variable O-glycosylation of CD13 (aminopeptidase N).
1991,
Pubmed
Olsen,
Structure and expression of aminopeptidase N.
1997,
Pubmed
O'Mara,
P-glycoprotein models of the apo and ATP-bound states based on homology with Sav1866 and MalK.
2007,
Pubmed
Plakidou-Dymock,
A role for aminopeptidase N in Na(+)-dependent amino acid transport in bovine renal brush-border membranes.
1993,
Pubmed
Redondo,
L-alanine-4-nitroanilide as a substrate for microsomal aminopeptidase.
1986,
Pubmed
Rich,
Inhibition of aminopeptidases by amastatin and bestatin derivatives. Effect of inhibitor structure on slow-binding processes.
1984,
Pubmed
Riemann,
CD13--not just a marker in leukemia typing.
1999,
Pubmed
Roepstorff,
Sequestration of epidermal growth factor receptors in non-caveolar lipid rafts inhibits ligand binding.
2002,
Pubmed
Romeo,
Luminal kidney and intestine SLC6 amino acid transporters of B0AT-cluster and their tissue distribution in Mus musculus.
2006,
Pubmed
Röper,
Retention of prominin in microvilli reveals distinct cholesterol-based lipid micro-domains in the apical plasma membrane.
2000,
Pubmed
Schägger,
Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form.
1991,
Pubmed
SCRIVER,
HARTNUP DISEASE: A GENETIC MODIFICATION OF INTESTINAL AND RENAL TRANSPORT OF CERTAIN NEUTRAL ALPHA-AMINO ACIDS.
1965,
Pubmed
Seow,
Hartnup disorder is caused by mutations in the gene encoding the neutral amino acid transporter SLC6A19.
2004,
Pubmed
Singer,
Orphan transporter SLC6A18 is renal neutral amino acid transporter B0AT3.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sjöström,
Structure and function of aminopeptidase N.
2000,
Pubmed
Spodsberg,
Characteristics and structural requirements of apical sorting of the rat growth hormone through the O-glycosylated stalk region of intestinal sucrase-isomaltase.
2001,
Pubmed
Stechly,
Galectin-4-regulated delivery of glycoproteins to the brush border membrane of enterocyte-like cells.
2009,
Pubmed
Tame,
The crystal structures of the oligopeptide-binding protein OppA complexed with tripeptide and tetrapeptide ligands.
1995,
Pubmed
Tame,
The structural basis of sequence-independent peptide binding by OppA protein.
1994,
Pubmed
Tyska,
Myosin-1a is critical for normal brush border structure and composition.
2005,
Pubmed
Vanslambrouck,
Renal imino acid and glycine transport system ontogeny and involvement in developmental iminoglycinuria.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vriend,
WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program.
1990,
Pubmed
Waugh,
Preparation of membrane rafts.
2009,
Pubmed