Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The frog, Xenopus laevis, is capable of completely regenerating a lens from the cornea epithelium. Because this ability appears to be limited to the larval stages of Xenopus, virtually all the work to understand the mechanisms regulating this process has been limited to pre-metamorphic tadpoles. It has been reported that the post-metamorphic cornea is competent to regenerate under experimental conditions, despite the fact that the in vivo capacity to regenerate is lost; however, that work didn't examine the regenerative potential of different regions of the cornea. A new model suggests that cornea-lens regeneration in Xenopus may be driven by oligopotent stem cells, and not by transdifferentiation of mature cornea cells. We investigated the regenerative potential of the limbal region in post-metamorphic cornea, where the stem cells of the cornea are thought to reside. Using EdU (5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine), we identified long-term label retaining cells in the basal cells of peripheral post-metamorphic Xenopus cornea, consistent with slow-cycling stem cells of the limbus that have been described in other vertebrates. Using this data to identify putative stem cells of the limbal region in Xenopus, we tested the regenerative competency of limbal regions and central cornea. These regions showed a similarly high ability for the cells of the basal epithelium to express lens proteins when cultured in proximity to larval retina. Thus, the regenerative competency in the post-metamorphic cornea is not restricted to stem cells of the limbal region, but also occurs in the transit amplifying cells throughout the basal layer of the cornea epithelium.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
27569373
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC5097883 ???displayArticle.link???Exp Eye Res ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Fig. 1. EdU label retention in post metamorphic corneas. A) Histological structure of a post-metamorphic cornea. Boxes with dotted lines indicate putative limbal regions, and box with solid line indicates central cornea (above pupillary space). After a 5 Day chase, EdU (red) can be observed throughout the basal layer of the epithelium (B) and the more superficial apical layers (C). Scale bar (100 μm) for both B and C is located in C. DAPI labeled nuclei are blue. D-E) EdU label (red) in 3 week (3W) cornea pelt. Boxes indicate locations of central and peripheral images in F-O. F-J) Corneas after 3 week chase show label retention in the peripheral cornea. F) An orthogonal projection of confocal data taken from cornea shown in D reveals the layers of the corneaepithelium (âCEâ) that are retaining signal. The stroma (âSâ) lies beneath the cornea. Arrow indicates the direction to the center of the cornea from the periphery. Arrowheads identify label retaining cells of the basal epithelium. G-H) Apical cell layers from the Z-stack used to create the orthogonal projection in (F). I-J) Basal cell layers from the Z-stack used to create the orthogonal projection in (F). K-O) Central cornea after 3 week chase has very little signal in basal layers, but some signal is still present in apical layers. * denotes macrophage-like cell commonly observed in basal layer of corneaepithelium (K, N). After 10 weeks of chase (P-AA), corneas possess label retaining cells in peripheral cornea (R-V), while the central cornea is relatively devoid of signal and the signal that remains is weak (W-AA). B, C, H, J, M, O, T, V, Y, and AA show an overlay of EdU (red) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar for D, E, P, and Q is 1 mm and is located in Q. Scale bar for G-J, L-O, S-V, and X-AA is 50 μm and is located in AA. Dorsal (âDâ) Ventral (âVâ) axis is shown in D and P.
Fig. 2. Regenerative capacity of the mature cornea. A) Zones of post-metamorphic donor corneas. Black dotted line represents putative limbal region. Scale bar in A is 1 mm. B-G) Representative cases of regeneration as defined by positive staining using an anti-lens antibody. Scale bar in B-G is 200 μm. H) Percent regenerative success as determined by the percentage of examined cases expressing lens proteins. Error bars indicate standard error. I) Mature cornea tucked inside larval retina is expressing lens proteins. J-K) Higher magnification showing expression in the same eye as (I) where lens crystallin protein expression is restricted to the basal layer of the corneaepithelium. Scale bar in I is 200 μm. Scalebar in J and K is 100 μm. J) Structure of mature cornea inside larval eyecup. Abbreviations: DL, dorsal limbal region; VL, ventral limbal region; CC, central cornea; S, stroma; CE, corneaepithelium; LR, larval retina; K, keratocytes; BE, basal cells of corneaepithelium; AE, apical cells of corneaepithelium.
Chung,
Localization of corneal epithelial stem cells in the developing rat.
1992, Pubmed
Chung,
Localization of corneal epithelial stem cells in the developing rat.
1992,
Pubmed
Cotsarelis,
Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells.
1989,
Pubmed
Davies,
Stem cell activity in the developing human cornea.
2009,
Pubmed
Filoni,
Lens regeneration in larval Xenopus laevis: experimental analysis of the decline in the regenerative capacity during development.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
FREEMAN,
LENS REGENERATION FROM THE CORNEA IN XENOPUS LAEVIS.
1963,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fukui,
FGF signaling is required for lens regeneration in Xenopus laevis.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Graw,
Eye development.
2010,
Pubmed
Hamilton,
Lens regeneration from the cornea requires suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Henry,
Cornea-lens transdifferentiation in the anuran, Xenopus tropicalis.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Henry,
Molecular and cellular aspects of amphibian lens regeneration.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Henry,
The matured eye of Xenopus laevis tadpoles produces factors that elicit a lens-forming response in embryonic ectoderm.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Henry,
Inductive interactions in the spatial and temporal restriction of lens-forming potential in embryonic ectoderm of Xenopus laevis.
1987,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Henry,
The cellular and molecular bases of vertebrate lens regeneration.
2003,
Pubmed
Hu,
The structure and development of Xenopus laevis cornea.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Perry,
Expression of pluripotency factors in larval epithelia of the frog Xenopus: evidence for the presence of cornea epithelial stem cells.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Salic,
A chemical method for fast and sensitive detection of DNA synthesis in vivo.
2008,
Pubmed
Slack,
Regional biosynthetic markers in the early amphibian embryo.
1984,
Pubmed
Thomas,
Retinoic acid regulation by CYP26 in vertebrate lens regeneration.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wolfe,
Neuronal leucine-rich repeat 6 (XlNLRR-6) is required for late lens and retina development in Xenopus laevis.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yoon,
Limbal stem cells: Central concepts of corneal epithelial homeostasis.
2014,
Pubmed
Zhao,
Distribution of label-retaining cells in the limbal epithelium of a mouse eye.
2009,
Pubmed