Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
A small group of core transcription factors, including Twist, Snail, Slug, and Sip1, control epithelial-mesenchymal transitions (EMTs) during both embryonic development and tumor metastasis. However, little is known about how these factors are coordinately regulated to mediate the requisite behavioral and fate changes. It was recently shown that a key mechanism for regulating Snail proteins is by modulating their stability. In this paper, we report that the stability of Twist is also regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. We found that the same E3 ubiquitin ligase known to regulate Snail family proteins, Partner of paired (Ppa), also controlled Twist stability and did so in a manner dependent on the Twist WR-rich domain. Surprisingly, Ppa could also target the third core EMT regulatory factor Sip1 for proteasomal degradation. Together, these results indicate that despite the structural diversity of the core transcriptional regulatory factors implicated in EMT, a common mechanism has evolved for controlling their stability and therefore their function.
Figure 1. Twist is an unstable protein. (A) Embryos were injected with mRNA encoding Twist, cultured to stage 8, and treated with CHX to prevent further protein synthesis. Western analysis demonstrates Twist protein instability. Actin serves as a loading control. (B) Twist levels decrease rapidly over developmental time. Embryos injected with Twist mRNA were collected at blastula, gastrula, neurula, and tailbud stages (left to right), and protein levels were analyzed via Western blotting. Twist is undetectable by early migrating neural crest stages.
Figure 2. The WR domain is targeted by ubiquitin and renders Twist unstable. (A) Polyubiquitinated forms of wild-type Twist were immunoprecipitated (IP) from lysates of embryos coinjected with epitope-tagged forms of Twist and ubiquitin. A ladder of polyubiquitinated Twist isoforms is noted when Twist and ubiquitin are coexpressed. IgG bands are indicated by an asterisk. IB, immunoblotted. (B) A schematic illustrating the Twist deletion constructs used in these experiments. (C) Polyubiquitinated forms of wild-type (WT) Twist and Twist C terminus (Cterm), but not Twist N terminus (Nterm) or Twist ÎWR, were immunoprecipitated from lysates of embryos coinjected with Twist deletion constructs and ubiquitin. IgG bands are indicated by asterisks. (D) Embryos were injected with wild-type Twist or Twist ÎWR mRNA, cultured to stage 8, and treated with CHX to block further protein synthesis. Western analysis shows that Twist ÎWR is highly stable compared with wild-type Twist. (E) Deletion of the Twist WR domain stabilizes Twist. Embryos injected with mRNA encoding wild-type Twist or Twist ÎWR were collected at blastula, gastrula, neurula, and tailbud stages, and protein expression levels were analyzed via Western blotting. Twist ÎWR is significantly more stable than wild-type Twist. Actin is used as a control.
Figure 3. Twist interacts with the E3 ubiquitin ligase Ppa via the WR domain. (A) Snail and Twist were immunoprecipitated (IP) from lysates of embryos coinjected with myc-tagged forms of Snail, Twist, or Sox10 and Flag-tagged Ppa using an α-Flag antibody. Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and Ppa-bound Snail and Twist were detected by α-Myc Western blotting. Sox10 does not immunoprecipitate with Ppa. IgG bands are indicated by an asterisk. IB, immunoblotted. (B) A schematic illustrating the Twist deletion and E12-WR fusion constructs. AD denotes the activation domains within E12 protein. WT, wild type. (C) The Twist WR domain is both necessary and sufficient for Ppa interaction. Both wild-type Twist and the E12-WR domain fusion protein were immunoprecipitated from lysates coinjected with either epitope-tagged forms of wild-type Twist or E12-WR and Ppa using the α-Flag antibody. Interacting proteins were detected by α-Myc Western blotting. E12 does not interact with Ppa, whereas the fusion protein strongly interacts. Deleting the WR domain eliminates interaction between Twist and Ppa. IgG bands are indicated by an asterisk. (D) Comparison of Xenopus Slug and Twist sequences required for Ppa interaction. The underlined residues denote amino acids required for PpaâSlug interaction as determined in Vernon and LaBonne (2006).
Figure 4. Ppa is an endogenous regulator of Twist stability. (A) Embryos injected with Twist alone or together with Ppa were treated with CHX at stage 8 and collected at the time points indicated. Twist protein is significantly destabilized by coexpression of Ppa. Actin is used as a loading control. (B) Embryos were coinjected with Twist and control or Ppa MO, treated with CHX at stage 8, and collected at the time points indicated. The loss of Ppa mediated by the Ppa MO significantly stabilizes Twist.
Figure 5. Ppa and the UPS also regulate another core EMT factor, Sip1. (A) Sip1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from lysates of embryos coinjected with epitope-tagged forms of Sip1 and Ppa or ubiquitin using α-Flag antibody, and interactions were detected by α-Myc Western blotting. IgG bands are indicated by an asterisk. IB, immunoblotted. (B) Embryos injected with Sip1 alone or together with Ppa were treated with CHX at stage 8 and collected at the time points indicated. Sip1 protein is significantly destabilized by coexpression of Ppa. Actin is used as a control. (C) A schematic illustrating the diversity in protein structure among the core EMT transcriptional factors. HD, homeodomain-like sequence; SBD, Smad-binding domain; ZnF, Zinc finger domain. (D) A model highlighting Ppa as a common control mechanism for the structurally diverse set of core EMT regulatory factors Snail, Slug, Sip1, and Twist. Multiple distinct signaling pathways converge on this common set of factors, but in the neural crest, Ppa serves as a common mechanism for UPS targeting. RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase.
Figure S1. Rescue of neural crest in Ppa-injected embryos by the
core EMT factors. (A) In situ hybridization using Sox10 probe of
stage 17 embryos previously injected with mRNA encoding Ppa
alone (a) or coinjected with Ppa and stabilized Twist (Twist îWR;
b), stabilized Slug (Slug î£1,2; Vernon and LaBonne, 2006; c), or
stabilized Twist, stabilized Slug, and Sip1 (d and e). Overexpression
of Ppa causes a loss of Sox10 expression, which is not rescued
by Twist coexpression and is incompletely rescued by Slug
coexpression. Coexpression of all three core EMT regulatory factors
leads to highly variable degrees of rescue (d vs. e). (B) Rescue
of neural crest Sox10 expression by the core EMT factors. The
graph indicates the percentage of embryos exhibiting a moderate
increase, normal moderate loss, or complete loss phenotype in embryos
expressing Ppa or Ppa+ core EMT factors (Twist îWR, Slug
î£1,2, and Sip1). (C) In situ hybridization using Sox10 probe of
stage 28 embryos previously injected with mRNA encoding Ppa
alone (a) or coinjected with Ppa and stabilized Twist (b) or stabilized
Twist, stabilized Slug, and Sip1 (c). Sox10 expression in the
cranial ganglia is disrupted in Ppa-injected embryos (a) and in embryos
coinjected with Ppa and stabilized Twist (b). Coexpression
of stabilized Twist, stabilized Slug, and Sip1 leads to massive ectopic
Sox10 expression, highlighting that the cellular levels of
these proteins are critical to their proper function. (A and C) Asterisks
mark the injected side of the embryo. Embryos were coinjected
with lineage tracer î¢-galactosidase, which is detected in
red. Bars, 200 μm.
Ansieau,
TWISTing an embryonic transcription factor into an oncoprotein.
2010, Pubmed
Ansieau,
TWISTing an embryonic transcription factor into an oncoprotein.
2010,
Pubmed
Aybar,
Snail precedes slug in the genetic cascade required for the specification and migration of the Xenopus neural crest.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Batlle,
The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells.
2000,
Pubmed
Bellmeyer,
The protooncogene c-myc is an essential regulator of neural crest formation in xenopus.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bindels,
Regulation of vimentin by SIP1 in human epithelial breast tumor cells.
2006,
Pubmed
Bolender,
Epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in chick atrioventricular cushion morphogenesis.
1979,
Pubmed
Browne,
ZEB proteins link cell motility with cell cycle control and cell survival in cancer.
2010,
Pubmed
Cakouros,
Twist-ing cell fate: mechanistic insights into the role of twist in lineage specification/differentiation and tumorigenesis.
2010,
Pubmed
Cano,
The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression.
2000,
Pubmed
Carver,
The mouse snail gene encodes a key regulator of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
2001,
Pubmed
Castanon,
A Twist in fate: evolutionary comparison of Twist structure and function.
2002,
Pubmed
Chen,
twist is required in head mesenchyme for cranial neural tube morphogenesis.
1995,
Pubmed
Comijn,
The two-handed E box binding zinc finger protein SIP1 downregulates E-cadherin and induces invasion.
2001,
Pubmed
Demontis,
Twist is substrate for caspase cleavage and proteasome-mediated degradation.
2006,
Pubmed
Duband,
Neural crest delamination and migration: integrating regulations of cell interactions, locomotion, survival and fate.
2006,
Pubmed
Eisaki,
XSIP1, a member of two-handed zinc finger proteins, induced anterior neural markers in Xenopus laevis animal cap.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Foubert,
Key signalling nodes in mammary gland development and cancer. The Snail1-Twist1 conspiracy in malignant breast cancer progression.
2010,
Pubmed
Fu,
The TWIST/Mi2/NuRD protein complex and its essential role in cancer metastasis.
2011,
Pubmed
Gammill,
Neural crest specification: migrating into genomics.
2003,
Pubmed
Griffith,
Epithelial-mesenchymal transformation during palatal fusion: carboxyfluorescein traces cells at light and electron microscopic levels.
1992,
Pubmed
Hajra,
The SLUG zinc-finger protein represses E-cadherin in breast cancer.
2002,
Pubmed
Hershko,
The ubiquitin system.
1998,
Pubmed
Ho,
F-box proteins: the key to protein degradation.
2006,
Pubmed
Hopwood,
A Xenopus mRNA related to Drosophila twist is expressed in response to induction in the mesoderm and the neural crest.
1989,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Huber,
Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression.
2005,
Pubmed
LaBonne,
Molecular mechanisms of neural crest formation.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
LaBonne,
Snail-related transcriptional repressors are required in Xenopus for both the induction of the neural crest and its subsequent migration.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
LaBonne,
Neural crest induction in Xenopus: evidence for a two-signal model.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Leptin,
Cell shape changes during gastrulation in Drosophila.
1990,
Pubmed
Leptin,
twist and snail as positive and negative regulators during Drosophila mesoderm development.
1991,
Pubmed
Leptin,
Gastrulation in Drosophila: the logic and the cellular mechanisms.
1999,
Pubmed
Linker,
Relationship between gene expression domains of Xsnail, Xslug, and Xtwist and cell movement in the prospective neural crest of Xenopus.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Locascio,
Cell movements during vertebrate development: integrated tissue behaviour versus individual cell migration.
2001,
Pubmed
Maeda,
Expression of SIP1 in oral squamous cell carcinomas: implications for E-cadherin expression and tumor progression.
2005,
Pubmed
Markwald,
Structural development of endocardial cushions.
1977,
Pubmed
Martin,
Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction.
2009,
Pubmed
Martin,
Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination.
2010,
Pubmed
Martin,
Expression of the transcription factors snail, slug, and twist and their clinical significance in human breast cancer.
2005,
Pubmed
Medici,
Snail and Slug promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition through beta-catenin-T-cell factor-4-dependent expression of transforming growth factor-beta3.
2008,
Pubmed
Montserrat,
Repression of E-cadherin by SNAIL, ZEB1, and TWIST in invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast: a cooperative effort?
2011,
Pubmed
Moody,
The transcriptional repressor Snail promotes mammary tumor recurrence.
2005,
Pubmed
Moustakas,
Signaling networks guiding epithelial-mesenchymal transitions during embryogenesis and cancer progression.
2007,
Pubmed
Nieto,
The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors.
2002,
Pubmed
O'Rourke,
Twist functions in mouse development.
2002,
Pubmed
Peinado,
Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype?
2007,
Pubmed
Peinado,
Snail mediates E-cadherin repression by the recruitment of the Sin3A/histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1)/HDAC2 complex.
2004,
Pubmed
Polyak,
Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits.
2009,
Pubmed
Rosivatz,
Differential expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulators snail, SIP1, and twist in gastric cancer.
2002,
Pubmed
Roussos,
AACR special conference on epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer progression and treatment.
2010,
Pubmed
Sauka-Spengler,
Snapshot: neural crest.
2010,
Pubmed
Seher,
Analysis and reconstitution of the genetic cascade controlling early mesoderm morphogenesis in the Drosophila embryo.
2007,
Pubmed
Shelton,
Twist1 function in endocardial cushion cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation during heart valve development.
2008,
Pubmed
Shook,
Mechanisms, mechanics and function of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in early development.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Soo,
Twist function is required for the morphogenesis of the cephalic neural tube and the differentiation of the cranial neural crest cells in the mouse embryo.
2002,
Pubmed
Takahashi,
Snail regulates p21(WAF/CIP1) expression in cooperation with E2A and Twist.
2004,
Pubmed
Taube,
Core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition interactome gene-expression signature is associated with claudin-low and metaplastic breast cancer subtypes.
2010,
Pubmed
Taylor,
Modulating the activity of neural crest regulatory factors.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Thiery,
Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions.
2006,
Pubmed
Thiery,
Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease.
2009,
Pubmed
Thisse,
The twist gene: isolation of a Drosophila zygotic gene necessary for the establishment of dorsoventral pattern.
1987,
Pubmed
Tucker,
Neural crest cells: a model for invasive behavior.
2004,
Pubmed
van Grunsven,
XSIP1, a Xenopus zinc finger/homeodomain encoding gene highly expressed during early neural development.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vernon,
Tumor metastasis: a new twist on epithelial-mesenchymal transitions.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vernon,
Slug stability is dynamically regulated during neural crest development by the F-box protein Ppa.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Verschueren,
SIP1, a novel zinc finger/homeodomain repressor, interacts with Smad proteins and binds to 5'-CACCT sequences in candidate target genes.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Viñas-Castells,
The hypoxia-controlled FBXL14 ubiquitin ligase targets SNAIL1 for proteasome degradation.
2010,
Pubmed
Wu,
Snail: More than EMT.
2010,
Pubmed
Wu,
Ingression of primary mesenchyme cells of the sea urchin embryo: a precisely timed epithelial mesenchymal transition.
2007,
Pubmed
Yang,
Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis.
2004,
Pubmed
Yang,
Bmi1 is essential in Twist1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
2010,
Pubmed
Yang,
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis.
2008,
Pubmed
Yook,
Wnt-dependent regulation of the E-cadherin repressor snail.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zhou,
Dual regulation of Snail by GSK-3beta-mediated phosphorylation in control of epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
2004,
Pubmed