Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Partitioning-defective 1 (PAR1) and atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) are conserved serine/threonine protein kinases implicated in the establishment of cell polarity in many species from yeast to humans. Here we investigate the roles of these protein kinases in cell fate determination in Xenopus epidermis. Early asymmetric cell divisions at blastula and gastrula stages give rise to the superficial (apical) and the deep (basal) cell layers of epidermal ectoderm. These two layers consist of cells with different intrinsic developmental potential, including superficial epidermal cells and deep ciliated cells. Our gain- and loss-of-function studies demonstrate that aPKC inhibits ciliated cell differentiation in Xenopus ectoderm and promotes superficial cell fates. We find that the crucial molecular substrate for aPKC is PAR1, which is localized in a complementary domain in superficialectoderm cells. We show that PAR1 acts downstream of aPKC and is sufficient to stimulate ciliated cell differentiation and inhibit superficialepidermal cell fates. Our results suggest that aPKC and PAR1 function sequentially in a conserved molecular pathway that links apical-basal cell polarity to Notch signaling and cell fate determination. The observed patterning mechanism may operate in a wide range of epithelial tissues in many species.
Fig. 1. A role of aPKC in epidermal ectoderm development. Four- to eight-cell embryos were unilaterally coinjected with aPKC-CAAX or aPKC-N RNAs and lacZ RNA as a lineage tracer (light blue staining). Injected embryos were cultured until stages 14-16, fixed and subjected to whole mount in situ hybridization with anti-sense probes to α-tubulin (A-H) and XK70 (L-S). aPKC constructs employed are shown above panels B and C. (A-K) Changes in ciliated cell differentiation. aPKC-CAAX decreases (B,E), whereas aPKC-N increases (C,F) ciliated cell differentiation (arrows) on the injected side as compared with the uninjected side (A,D). The same embryo is shown in A and B. (D-F) Sections corresponding to embryos in A-C. (D) A single row of α-tubulin-positive cells in the deep layer of uninjected ectoderm. (F) α-Tubulin-positive cells are found in the superficial layer (arrows). (G) Quantification of the results showing mean numbers of α-tubulin-positive cells per section±s.d. Sections of at least three representative embryos per group were analyzed. (H) Frequency of embryos with altered numbers of ciliated cells (data pooled from several experiments). Embryos were scored positive if the number of ciliated cells per injected area was increased by at least 50%. The data are representative of three independent experiments. (I-K) Cilia differentiation assessed by immunostaining with antibodies to acetylated tubulin in stage 18 embryos. (I) Uninjected control embryos with regular pattern of superficially located ciliated cells, (J) aPKC-CAAX injection inhibits cilia formation, (K) aPKC-N injection results in multiple cells with many differentiated cilia. (L-S) aPKC promotes superficial cell fate. (L,O) Control XK70 staining. (M,P) aPKC-CAAX expands XK70 (arrow) on the injected side. (N,Q) aPKC-N downregulates XK70 (arrow). (O-Q) Sections corresponding to embryos in L-N. Superficial expression of XK70 (O) is extended into the deep cell layer in aPKC-CAAX RNA-injected embryos (P, arrowhead). (Q) Inhibition of XK70 by aPKC-N (arrowhead). In all panels, arrows indicate altered staining as a result of injection. (R,S) Quantification of the effects, shown as average numbers of XK70-expressing cells in affected embryos (R), and frequency of embryos with visible changes in XK70 expression (S). Numbers of embryos per group are given above the bars. The data are from three representative experiments.
Fig. 3. PAR1 promotes ciliated cell differentiation. Four- to eight-cell embryos were unilaterally injected with lacZ RNA (light blue staining) or PAR1 RNAs or MO as indicated and subjected to in situ hybridization for α-tubulin expression at stages 13-14. (A-D) T560A increases the number of α-tubulin-expressing cells in epidermal ectoderm. (C,D) Cross-sections of embryos shown in A,B. A single layer ofα -tubulin-positive cells in control ectoderm (C) expanded to a double layer of positive cells in T560A-expressing ectoderm (D, arrowhead). (E,F) Enhanced cilia differentiation in T560A RNA-injected embryos at stage 18 (F), when compared with uninjected controls (E), revealed by immunostaining for acetylated tubulin. Arrowhead in E demarcates ciliated cells that migrated to the surface. Arrow in F indicates ectopic ciliated cells remaining in the inner ectoderm layer. (G,H) PAR1B MO decreases the number of α-tubulin-expressing cells (H) as compared with the uninjected side (G). (I) Uninjected embryo; (J) PAR1 RNA increases ciliated cell number (white arrow); (K) PAR1 KD RNA has no significant effect on ciliated cells. Lateral view is shown in all panels, except I-K (ventral view).
Fig. 4. Lack of effect of β-catenin and LGL on ciliated cell development. In situ hybridization with α-tubulin probe is shown. For experimental details, see Fig. 1 legend. (A) Uninjected embryo. (B) LGL1 (Xlgl1) RNA has no effect on α-tubulin-expressing cells. (C,D) Quantification of the effects of T560A, PAR1, PAR1-KD, β-catenin and LGL1 RNAs on ciliated cell development, presented as frequencies of affected embryos (C) and numbers of ciliated cells per section (D). In C, numbers of embryos per group are shown above bars. Data are representative of four different experiments. (E,F,I) LGL1 RNA, used in B, altered ectoderm pigmentation in 79% of injected embryos (n=19; F) as compared with uninjected controls (E). (I) Quantification of the results in E and F. (G,H,J) Marginal zone-injected β-catenin RNA dorsalized 92% of injected embryos (n=14), characterized by enlarged head and cement gland and truncated or missing tail (H), as compared with uninjected siblings (G). (J) Quantification of the results in G,H.
Fig. 5. aPKC functions upstream of PAR1 to specify ectodermal cell fates. Embryos were injected with RNAs or MO as described in Fig. 1. Ciliated cells were detected at stages 14-16 by in situ hybridization with the α-tubulin probe. (A-C) T560A reverses the inhibitory effect of aPKC-CAAX on ciliated cell differentiation. Two sides of the same embryo are shown in B and C. (D-F) PAR1B MO (F) suppresses aPKC-N-mediated expansion of ciliated cells. The injected and uninjected sides of the same embryo are shown in D and E, respectively. (G-J) Quantification of the data shown in A-C (G,H) and D-F (I,J). Numbers of embryos per group are shown above bars. (G,I) Frequencies of embryos showing visible phenotypic changes. (H,J) Mean numbers of α-tubulin-positive cells per section±s.d. are shown. Sections of at least three representative embryos per group were analyzed.
Fig. 8 . PAR1 synergizes with XDelta-1 to induce ciliated cell differentiation and inhibits the Notch target ESR6e. Four- to eight-cell embryos were unilaterally injected with the indicated RNAs and lacZ RNA as a lineage tracer (light blue staining) and subjected to in situ hybridization with the ESR6e (A,B) or -tubulin (E-L) probes. (A,B) Superficial staining for ESR6e is unaffected in cross-sections of lacZ RNA-injected control embryos (A, 100 pg), but is inhibited in PAR1 RNA-injected embryos (B, right side, arrowhead, 250 pg). (C) Basolateral localization of XDelta-1 in Xenopus ectoderm. (D) XDelta-1 is detected in multiple cytoplasmic vesicles (arrowheads) in the presence of PAR1. (E) Uninjected embryo. (F,G) XDelta-1 RNA alone (F) or low dose of PAR1 RNA (G) do not significantly alter the number of ciliated cells. (H) The synergistic effect of coinjected PAR1 and XDelta-1 RNAs on ciliated cell development. (I,J) PAR1 does not influence the activity of a dominant intracellular inhibitor of the Notch pathway, dnRBP/j, which can stimulate ciliated cell development. (K) Notch-ICD suppresses ciliated cell differentiation. (L) PAR1 does not alter Notch-ICD activity. (M-O) Quantification of the effects shown in E-J, presented as numbers of ciliated cells per section (M,N) and frequency of embryos with increased -tubulin staining (O). Numbers of examined embryos are shown above bars. The data are representative of three independent experiments.
Alonso,
Stem cells in the skin: waste not, Wnt not.
2003, Pubmed
Alonso,
Stem cells in the skin: waste not, Wnt not.
2003,
Pubmed
Bayraktar,
Par-1 kinase establishes cell polarity and functions in Notch signaling in the Drosophila embryo.
2006,
Pubmed
Benton,
Drosophila PAR-1 and 14-3-3 inhibit Bazooka/PAR-3 to establish complementary cortical domains in polarized cells.
2003,
Pubmed
Betschinger,
Dare to be different: asymmetric cell division in Drosophila, C. elegans and vertebrates.
2004,
Pubmed
Blanpain,
Canonical notch signaling functions as a commitment switch in the epidermal lineage.
2006,
Pubmed
Böhm,
Mammalian homologues of C. elegans PAR-1 are asymmetrically localized in epithelial cells and may influence their polarity.
1997,
Pubmed
Cappello,
The Rho-GTPase cdc42 regulates neural progenitor fate at the apical surface.
2006,
Pubmed
Chalmers,
Intrinsic differences between the superficial and deep layers of the Xenopus ectoderm control primary neuronal differentiation.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chalmers,
aPKC, Crumbs3 and Lgl2 control apicobasal polarity in early vertebrate development.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chalmers,
Oriented cell divisions asymmetrically segregate aPKC and generate cell fate diversity in the early Xenopus embryo.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chalmers,
Grainyhead-like 3, a transcription factor identified in a microarray screen, promotes the specification of the superficial layer of the embryonic epidermis.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chitnis,
Primary neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos regulated by a homologue of the Drosophila neurogenic gene Delta.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Cohen,
Mammalian PAR-1 determines epithelial lumen polarity by organizing the microtubule cytoskeleton.
2004,
Pubmed
Deblandre,
Xenopus neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that interacts with XDelta1 and regulates Notch signaling.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Deblandre,
A two-step mechanism generates the spacing pattern of the ciliated cells in the skin of Xenopus embryos.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Doerflinger,
The role of PAR-1 in regulating the polarised microtubule cytoskeleton in the Drosophila follicular epithelium.
2003,
Pubmed
Dollar,
Regulation of Lethal giant larvae by Dishevelled.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Drysdale,
Cell Migration and Induction in the Development of the Surface Ectodermal Pattern of the Xenopus laevis Tadpole: (Xenopus/ciliated cell/hatching gland/cement gland/ectodermal differentiation).
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Etemad-Moghadam,
Asymmetrically distributed PAR-3 protein contributes to cell polarity and spindle alignment in early C. elegans embryos.
1995,
Pubmed
Fagotto,
Beta-catenin localization during Xenopus embryogenesis: accumulation at tissue and somite boundaries.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Götz,
The cell biology of neurogenesis.
2005,
Pubmed
Guo,
Molecular genetics of asymmetric cleavage in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo.
1996,
Pubmed
Harland,
In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hopwood,
MyoD expression in the forming somites is an early response to mesoderm induction in Xenopus embryos.
1989,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Horne-Badovinac,
Positional cloning of heart and soul reveals multiple roles for PKC lambda in zebrafish organogenesis.
2001,
Pubmed
Hurov,
Atypical PKC phosphorylates PAR-1 kinases to regulate localization and activity.
2004,
Pubmed
Imai,
Inactivation of aPKClambda results in the loss of adherens junctions in neuroepithelial cells without affecting neurogenesis in mouse neocortex.
2006,
Pubmed
Itoh,
Mind bomb is a ubiquitin ligase that is essential for efficient activation of Notch signaling by Delta.
2003,
Pubmed
Itoh,
Nuclear localization is required for Dishevelled function in Wnt/beta-catenin signaling.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kosodo,
Asymmetric distribution of the apical plasma membrane during neurogenic divisions of mammalian neuroepithelial cells.
2004,
Pubmed
Kusakabe,
The polarity-inducing kinase Par-1 controls Xenopus gastrulation in cooperation with 14-3-3 and aPKC.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lechler,
Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin.
2005,
Pubmed
Lee,
Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation.
2006,
Pubmed
Luo,
Inca: a novel p21-activated kinase-associated protein required for cranial neural crest development.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Müller,
Epithelial cell polarity in early Xenopus development.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nakaya,
Meiotic maturation induces animal-vegetal asymmetric distribution of aPKC and ASIP/PAR-3 in Xenopus oocytes.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ohno,
Intercellular junctions and cellular polarity: the PAR-aPKC complex, a conserved core cassette playing fundamental roles in cell polarity.
2001,
Pubmed
Ohshiro,
Role of cortical tumour-suppressor proteins in asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblast.
2000,
Pubmed
Ossipova,
Distinct PAR-1 proteins function in different branches of Wnt signaling during vertebrate development.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Parkinson,
Identification of PKCzetaII: an endogenous inhibitor of cell polarity.
2004,
Pubmed
Pellettieri,
Anterior-posterior polarity in C. elegans and Drosophila--PARallels and differences.
2002,
Pubmed
Peng,
The tumour-suppressor genes lgl and dlg regulate basal protein targeting in Drosophila neuroblasts.
2000,
Pubmed
Peng,
Xenopus laevis: Practical uses in cell and molecular biology. Solutions and protocols.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Plant,
A polarity complex of mPar-6 and atypical PKC binds, phosphorylates and regulates mammalian Lgl.
2003,
Pubmed
Plusa,
Downregulation of Par3 and aPKC function directs cells towards the ICM in the preimplantation mouse embryo.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Roegiers,
Asymmetric cell division.
2004,
Pubmed
Rolls,
Drosophila aPKC regulates cell polarity and cell proliferation in neuroblasts and epithelia.
2003,
Pubmed
Saka,
Spatial and temporal patterns of cell division during early Xenopus embryogenesis.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sanada,
G protein betagamma subunits and AGS3 control spindle orientation and asymmetric cell fate of cerebral cortical progenitors.
2005,
Pubmed
Sun,
PAR-1 is a Dishevelled-associated kinase and a positive regulator of Wnt signalling.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Suzuki,
aPKC acts upstream of PAR-1b in both the establishment and maintenance of mammalian epithelial polarity.
2004,
Pubmed
Tomancak,
A Drosophila melanogaster homologue of Caenorhabditis elegans par-1 acts at an early step in embryonic-axis formation.
2000,
Pubmed
Vaccari,
The Drosophila PAR-1 spacer domain is required for lateral membrane association and for polarization of follicular epithelial cells.
2005,
Pubmed
Winkles,
Developmentally regulated cytokeratin gene in Xenopus laevis.
1985,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wodarz,
Asymmetric cell division during neurogenesis in Drosophila and vertebrates.
2003,
Pubmed
Wodarz,
Drosophila atypical protein kinase C associates with Bazooka and controls polarity of epithelia and neuroblasts.
2000,
Pubmed
