Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The metaphase spindle is a dynamic bipolar structure crucial for proper chromosome segregation, but how microtubules (MTs) are organized within the bipolar architecture remains controversial. To explore MT organization along the pole-to-pole axis, we simulated meiotic spindle assembly in two dimensions using dynamic MTs, a MT cross-linking force, and a kinesin-5-like motor. The bipolar structures that form consist of antiparallel fluxing MTs, but spindle pole formation requires the addition of a NuMA-like minus-end cross-linker and directed transport of MT depolymerization activity toward minus ends. Dynamic instability and minus-end depolymerization generate realistic MT lifetimes and a truncated exponential MT length distribution. Keeping the number of MTs in the simulation constant, we explored the influence of two different MT nucleation pathways on spindle organization. When nucleation occurs throughout the spindle, the simulation quantitatively reproduces features of meiotic spindles assembled in Xenopus egg extracts.
Figure 1. Self-assembly of a fluxing bipolar MT array with dynamic MTs and kinesin-5. (A) Simulations were initiated with MTs in an antiparallel array centered in the zone of high RanGTP concentration (yellow dashed line). MT color indicates orientation (MTs with plus-ends pointed to the right in red, to the left in green) and region (minus-end region in white). (B) MTs experience repulsion at close range (0â50 nm) and attraction between 50 and 90 nm. The shaded area represents the interaction zone. (C) Homotetrameric kinesin-5 (orange) are simple plus endâdirected motors, and slide apart antiparallel MTs. (D) Kymograph of selected MT minus-ends (green) and kinesin-5 motors (orange) shows that kinesin-5 remains stationary while bound MTs slide poleward. (E) Bipolar MT structure formed by MTs, cross-linking force, and kinesin-5. Single MTs extend far from the midzone, and poles are not defined.
Figure 2. Depolymerization recruited by dynein-transported NuMA generates spindle poles. (A) NuMA (yellow) is transported to MT minus-ends by dynein (cyan). Oligomerization of NuMA leads to its accumulation at the spindle poles. (B) NuMA (yellow) recruits kinesin-13, whose binding (blue gradient) is spread among adjacent MTs. However, depolymerization (blue stars) only occurs at minus ends. Depolymerization is proportional to the amount of NuMA and inversely proportional to the local MT density (see Materials and methods). (C) Steady-state spindle structure with oligomerized NuMA (yellow) delivered to the pole by dynein (cyan). In the midzone, small amounts of kinesin-13 activity produce only slow depolymerization of minus ends. At the poles, accumulated NuMA recruits a large amount depolymerization activity distributed over few MTs, resulting in high depolymerization rates. (D) Minus-end density shows no polar accumulation (black) unless kinesin-13 depolymerization is added to the model (dark blue). With depolymerization, NuMA (light blue) accumulates at spindle poles (black arrows; average of 100, 95 simulations). (E) Schematic of metaphase steady state. MT density decreases from the midzone to the pole (green). Because depolymerization activity is spread over MTs, the depolymerization rate per MT increases with the distance from the midzone.
Figure 3. Spindle assembly is sensitive to mechanisms affecting internal MT organization but not to MT length distribution. (A) When the area of chromatin-mediated nucleation was decreased to span 10 µm, the bipolarity (green, yellow, and red) of MT structures was sensitive to the nucleation pathway. Color indicates MT âbipolarity indexâ defined in Materials and methods: astral (red), bipolar (yellow), strongly bipolar (green). MT structures remained bipolar only for percentages of chromatin-mediated nucleation up to 25%, while spindle length in the bipolar regime scaled slightly with nucleation pathway (92 simulations). (B) Position of the minus ends of right-oriented MTs at a single time point with a 10-µm zone of chromatin-mediated MT nucleation (double arrow). In a simulation with 86% MT amplification (green), the bipolar MT structure contained short MTs throughout while long MTs were positioned with their minus ends at the pole (dashed lines). Four sample MTs are illustrated (arrows). In a simulation with only 25% MT amplification (red), the astral MT structure also contained small MTs throughout, but minus ends did not extend far from the midzone, and plus ends grew past minus ends. (C) Mean MT length and bipolarity index (color) for simulations in which parameters for the nucleation pathway, MT plus-end growth rate, MT plus-end catastrophe rate, and kinesin-13 rate were varied. Bold circles indicate the simulations represented in D (92, 99, 95, 99 simulations). (D) Total MT density along the pole-to-pole axis from representative simulations (bold circles in C), where color indicates bipolarity index. Spindles could form and fail in a variety of sizes, indicating a strong dependence for bipolarity on assembly mechanism rather than the exact organization of the MT structure.
Figure 4. Length of simulated spindles scales with catastrophe rate and minus-end depolymerization activity. (A and B) Range of steady-state spindle structures obtained with different MT plus-end catastrophe frequencies (mean ± SD, 95 simulations). (C and D) Range of steady-state spindle structures obtained with different MT minus-end depolymerization rates (mean ± SD, 126 simulations). In AâD, the text or symbol color designates bipolarity index: astral (red), bipolar (yellow), strongly bipolar (green).
Athale,
Regulation of microtubule dynamics by reaction cascades around chromosomes.
2008, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Athale,
Regulation of microtubule dynamics by reaction cascades around chromosomes.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Badoual,
Bidirectional cooperative motion of molecular motors.
2002,
Pubmed
Brown,
Xenopus tropicalis egg extracts provide insight into scaling of the mitotic spindle.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Budde,
Regulation of Op18 during spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Burbank,
Slide-and-cluster models for spindle assembly.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Burbank,
A new method reveals microtubule minus ends throughout the meiotic spindle.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Carazo-Salas,
Ran-GTP coordinates regulation of microtubule nucleation and dynamics during mitotic-spindle assembly.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Caudron,
Spatial coordination of spindle assembly by chromosome-mediated signaling gradients.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Clausen,
Self-organization of anastral spindles by synergy of dynamic instability, autocatalytic microtubule production, and a spatial signaling gradient.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Desai,
Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dionne,
NuMA is a component of an insoluble matrix at mitotic spindle poles.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dogterom,
Physical aspects of the growth and regulation of microtubule structures.
1993,
Pubmed
Dumont,
Force and length in the mitotic spindle.
2009,
Pubmed
Gadde,
Mechanisms and molecules of the mitotic spindle.
2004,
Pubmed
Gaetz,
Dynein/dynactin regulate metaphase spindle length by targeting depolymerizing activities to spindle poles.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gennerich,
Force-induced bidirectional stepping of cytoplasmic dynein.
2007,
Pubmed
Goshima,
Augmin: a protein complex required for centrosome-independent microtubule generation within the spindle.
2008,
Pubmed
Goshima,
Length control of the metaphase spindle.
2005,
Pubmed
Haren,
Direct binding of NuMA to tubulin is mediated by a novel sequence motif in the tail domain that bundles and stabilizes microtubules.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Heald,
Spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts: respective roles of centrosomes and microtubule self-organization.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Helenius,
The depolymerizing kinesin MCAK uses lattice diffusion to rapidly target microtubule ends.
2006,
Pubmed
Hentrich,
Microtubule organization by the antagonistic mitotic motors kinesin-5 and kinesin-14.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Houghtaling,
Op18 reveals the contribution of nonkinetochore microtubules to the dynamic organization of the vertebrate meiotic spindle.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Jang,
DDA3 recruits microtubule depolymerase Kif2a to spindle poles and controls spindle dynamics and mitotic chromosome movement.
2008,
Pubmed
Janson,
Efficient formation of bipolar microtubule bundles requires microtubule-bound gamma-tubulin complexes.
2005,
Pubmed
Kalab,
Visualization of a Ran-GTP gradient in interphase and mitotic Xenopus egg extracts.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kapitein,
Microtubule cross-linking triggers the directional motility of kinesin-5.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kapoor,
Eg5 is static in bipolar spindles relative to tubulin: evidence for a static spindle matrix.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kapoor,
Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kisurina-Evgenieva,
Multiple mechanisms regulate NuMA dynamics at spindle poles.
2004,
Pubmed
Korneev,
Load-dependent release limits the processive stepping of the tetrameric Eg5 motor.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mahoney,
Making microtubules and mitotic spindles in cells without functional centrosomes.
2006,
Pubmed
Merdes,
Formation of spindle poles by dynein/dynactin-dependent transport of NuMA.
2000,
Pubmed
Merdes,
A complex of NuMA and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for mitotic spindle assembly.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mitchison,
Bipolarization and poleward flux correlate during Xenopus extract spindle assembly.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Miyamoto,
The kinesin Eg5 drives poleward microtubule flux in Xenopus laevis egg extract spindles.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nédélec,
Self-organization of microtubules and motors.
1997,
Pubmed
Needleman,
Fast microtubule dynamics in meiotic spindles measured by single molecule imaging: evidence that the spindle environment does not stabilize microtubules.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ohi,
Nonredundant functions of Kinesin-13s during meiotic spindle assembly.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shirasu-Hiza,
Eg5 causes elongation of meiotic spindles when flux-associated microtubule depolymerization is blocked.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tirnauer,
Microtubule plus-end dynamics in Xenopus egg extract spindles.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Toba,
Overlapping hand-over-hand mechanism of single molecular motility of cytoplasmic dynein.
2006,
Pubmed
Uteng,
Poleward transport of Eg5 by dynein-dynactin in Xenopus laevis egg extract spindles.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Valentine,
Individual dimers of the mitotic kinesin motor Eg5 step processively and support substantial loads in vitro.
2006,
Pubmed
van den Wildenberg,
The homotetrameric kinesin-5 KLP61F preferentially crosslinks microtubules into antiparallel orientations.
2008,
Pubmed
Varga,
Yeast kinesin-8 depolymerizes microtubules in a length-dependent manner.
2006,
Pubmed
Verde,
Control of microtubule dynamics and length by cyclin A- and cyclin B-dependent kinases in Xenopus egg extracts.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walczak,
A model for the proposed roles of different microtubule-based motor proteins in establishing spindle bipolarity.
,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walczak,
Mechanisms of mitotic spindle assembly and function.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walczak,
XKCM1: a Xenopus kinesin-related protein that regulates microtubule dynamics during mitotic spindle assembly.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wilde,
Ran stimulates spindle assembly by altering microtubule dynamics and the balance of motor activities.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yang,
Architectural dynamics of the meiotic spindle revealed by single-fluorophore imaging.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yang,
Regional variation of microtubule flux reveals microtubule organization in the metaphase meiotic spindle.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yang,
Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint.
2007,
Pubmed
Zhu,
FAM29A promotes microtubule amplification via recruitment of the NEDD1-gamma-tubulin complex to the mitotic spindle.
2008,
Pubmed