Wu Y , Chen Z , Canessa CM .

5R21MH10746402 National Institute of Mental Health, R21 MH107464 NIMH NIH HHS, 5R21MH10746402 NIMH NIH HHS

	Figure 1. Substitutions of residue Q276 diminish or abolish desensitization.(A) Sequence alignment of β9 strand of ASIC isoforms from various vertebrate species. Ribbon representation of the crystal structure of the extracellular domain (ECD) of a single subunit of chicken ASIC1. Positions of Q276 and Q278 in β9 are shown as sticks colored red and yellow, respectively. The β11- β12 linker near Q276 has been proposed to functionally divide the ECD into Upper ECD and Lower ECD. (B) Superimposed normalized currents of wild type hASIC1a and Q276 mutants activated by pH 6.5. The vertical dashed line marks the time corresponding to 3x the time constant of desensitization of wild-type channels (τwt). (C) Ratio of sustained/peak currents at time 3xτwt for various Q276 mutants. Columns in blue or in red represent amino acids smaller or larger than glutamine (Q). Error bars are ± SD, n = 8 to 10 cells. The filled circles superimposed on the bars indicate the volume of the corresponding amino acid in à 3 as indicated in the y-right axis: in black is Q, in green smaller and in orange larger than Q.Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Representative examples of normalized current traces of various Q276 mutants and the control Q278G.Bars above currents indicate application of pH 6.5 activating solution.
	Figure 2. Selectivity and kinetics of Q276G and Q276N mutants.(A) Representative example of an out-side out patch containing approximately forty Q276G channels. Currents were induced by a rapid change of external solution from pH 7.4 to 6.5 for 80 s and retuned to pH 7.4. Symmetrical 100 mM NaCl. Holding potential −60 mV. (B) Example of a patch containing two Q276G channels activated by pH 6.5 continuously for 2.4 min. Some openings last 50 s. C, O1 and O2 indicate the zero current level (closed) and one or two open channels. (C) A representative example of out-side out patch containing approximately five Q276N channels activated by pH 6.5. (D) Representative examples of unitary currents from wild-type hASIC1a channels elicited by three consecutive sweeps of pH 6.5. An expanded time scale 0.2 s is required to discern opening events. (E) Ion selectivity was calculated by changes in reversal potential according to the indicated protocol. Out-side patches expressing Q276G channels were perfused with external solutions containing 100 mM of a selected cation and 100 mM Na+ in the patch pipette. A voltage ramp from −75 to 75 mV of 250 ms duration was applied at pH 7.4. After activation with a solution containing the same external cation but buffered at pH 6.5, ramps were repeated four times for each ion. The currents obtained at pH 6.5 and 7.4 were subtracted to obtained ASIC1a specific currents and to correct for leaks. Only patches with ramps successfully measured with Na+, K+, and Cs+ were used in the calculations. (F) I-V relations of Q276G in the presence of 100 mM external Na+, K+ or Cs+. Each line represents the average of three independent patches.Figure 2—figure supplement 1. A kinetic scheme describing gating of channels that exhibit strong desensitization from the pre-open and open states.C, O and D represent closed, open and desensitized states. C is in the resting state, CH+ are in partially activated states, and CnH+ is the opening-permissive state. In hASIC1a, the transitions between C states are H+ dependent, indicated by f[H+]. The wild-type ASIC1a open state completely desensitizes as indicated by the thick arrow that in this scheme means a high value for the rate constant kODo (transition from OH+ to DOH+). Pre-open channels (CH+) -those that make the most abundant population at low proton concentrations (pH range 7.2 to 7.0) when not all subunits within a trimer are protonated- and CnH+ undergo strong SSD (thick arrows). For Q276 mutants, specifically Q276G, the rate constants leading to desensitization –kODo and kCDc- are markedly reduced that is channels exhibit very long opening events and are resistant to SSD.
	Figure 3. Mutations of Q276 diminish SSD.(A) Values of apparent pHSSD and (B) apparent pH50A of substitutions in position 276. Curves represent fits of data points (n = 5–8 independent measurements) to the Hill equation. (C) Current traces of Q276G activated sequentially with solutions of the indicated pH (bars above the trace) in the presence of 2 mM Ca2+ and nominal 0 mM Ca2+. Pre-conditioning protons do not induce SSD in any of the two conditions. (D) The absence of Ca2+ in the activating solution increases the apparent affinity for protons from pH50A6.8 to 7.0.Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Q276G channels are insensitive to agents that modulate SSD.(A) The tarantula toxin Pctx1 (5 nM) in preconditioning solutions of three different pH values does not change the Q276G response to pH 6.5. (B) 0.25 mM Spermine (SPM) in the bathing solution does not change the absence of SSD in Q276G but shifts the apparent pH50A from 6.8 to 6.5. (C) pH-dependence of Q276G activation in the presence of 0.25 mM spermine.
	Figure 4. The equivalent residue Q276 in hASIC1a controls desensitization in rat ASIC2 and ASIC3.(A) Wild-type rASIC2a currents activated by pH 4.0 undergo progressive desensitization as the preconditioning pH changes from 7.4 to 6.3, whereas mutant Q275G exhibits non-desensitizing currents that are insensitive to low preconditioning pH. (B) pH dependence of activation and SSD of wild-type ASIC2a and ASIC2a-Q275G. Error bars are ± SD, n = 5 cells. (C) and (D) similar experiments conducted with rat ASIC3 and ASIC3-Q269G except for the currents were activated with solution of pH 6.0.
	Figure 5. Functional and physical interactions of Q276 and N416 residues.(A) Current traces of single cysteine mutants N416C and Q276C activated by increasing concentrations of protons. N416C channels completely desensitize, whereas Q276C exhibit a fraction of sustained current. (B) The double mutant Q276C-N416C exhibits only sustained currents. After treatment with DTT a desensitizing current appeared. Inset shows predicted locations of the two cysteines in the closed conformation and a putative disulfide bond as a line linking the residues. (C) Comparison of the pH dependence of SSD of single and double mutants shows the double mutant is insensitive to SSD. (D) Columns represent the fractions of sustained and peak currents before and after DTT treatment. Currents were normalized to the values prior to DTT; n = 15 cells. Asterisks indicate p values < 0.005. (E) Normalized currents of substitutions of N416 superimposed on the wild type (black trace). (F) Ratio of sustained/peak currents at time 3xτwt of N416 mutants ordered from low to large side chain volume indicated by the filled circles on the bars. Error bars are SD, n = 8 to 10 cells. (G) pH dependence of SSD of N416 mutants. Lines are the fit of data points (n = 5–8 independent measurements) to the Hill equation ± SD. (H) Normalized currents of substitutions of L415 superimposed on the wild type (black trace). (I) Ratio of sustained/peak currents at time 3xτwt of L415 mutants ordered from low to large side chain indicated by the filled circles on the bars. Error bars are SD, n = 8 to 10 cells. (J) pH dependence of SSD of L415 mutants. E data point is the mean ± SD of 5 to 8 independent cells.Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Mutations in the b11-b12 linker decrease sensitivity to protons and prolonged duration of openings.(A) pH dependence of activation of N416 mutants. Some substitutions markedly decrease the apparent pH50A. (B) Representative example of an out-side patch expressing two N416R channels activated with external solution of pH 6.5. The recording shows uninterrupted long opening events of 10 to 30 s duration. (C) pH dependence of activation of L415 mutants. Similar as for N415 mutants, some substitutions in position L415 also display higher values of apparent pH50A than wild type channels. (D) Representative example of an out-side patch expressing a single L415R channel activated with external solution of pH 6.5. The recording shows few but very long opening events.
	Figure 6. One WT subunit in ASIC1a trimer is sufficient to induce SSD.(A) Current traces of four trimers containing three wild-type subunits (WT-WT-WT), one (WT-Q276G-WT) or two (WT-Q276G-Q276G) mutant subunits elicited by pH 6.5 exhibit SSD but not channels with three (Q276G-Q276G-Q276G). WT-Q276G-Q276G trimers exhibit a small component of current resistant to desensitization. (B) pH response to SSD of the four trimers shown in (A).Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Schematic and expression of trimers containing wild type or mutant monomers (Q276G).(A) Cartoon representation of hASIC1a trimers constructed by ligation of three subunits using unique restriction sites. Each subunit has the indicated tag at the carboxyteminus. (B) Western blot analysis of the four trimers using anti-Flag, anti-V5 and anti-HA monoclonal antibodies. WT monomer (~68 kDa) detected with anti-HA monoclonal. The upper band ~130 kDa corresponds to aggregated subunits owing to overloading the lane with protein.
	Figure 7. Proposed Q-valve mechanism to control of hASIC1a desensitization.(A) Ribbon representation of the area containing the Q-valve: β9 and β11- β12 linker in the ECD of cASIC1 in Closed, Open and Desensitized conformations. The linker is compressed upon proton activation inducing 180o rotation of L415 and N416. Slight upward movement of β12 further increases the compression in the desensitized channel. (B) Side chains of Q276, L415 and N416 are shown as colored spheres. (C) Cartoon depicting proposed mechanism of the Q-valve: in the Closed state Q276 and L415 close the valve. In the Open state, the valve opens as protons induce a conformational change of the upper ECD that compresses the upper vestibule formed by β strands of the palm and the β11- β12 linker. Compression of the linker promotes an 180o rotation of N416 and L415 in opposite directions and facing Q276: trajectory indicated by the arrows. Red cross shows the valve closed and how Q276 could prevent backward rotation of L415, which in turn would relax the linker preventing full desensitization. Predicted intermediate states and direction of rotation are derived from functional analysis of substitutions in the three key residues making the valve.Figure 7—video 1. From analysis of the functional data of mutant channels and cASIC1 structures it emerges a possible mechanism for desensitization wherein the central elements are three residues: Q276 located in the middle of β9 strand and L415 and N416 in the β11- β12 linker.In the closed conformation, the β11- β12 linker is relaxed and the side chains of Q276 and N416 are in proximity keeping the Q-valve closed. Proton-induced activation separates the β strands of the lower palm and compresses the β11- β12 linker leading to opening of the Q-valve and enabling 180o rotation of L415 and N416 in opposite directions with their side chains facing Q276. We speculate that the conformational change produced by the full rotation of L415 and N416 propagates downward through the β12 strand to TM2 to close the gate of the pore. In the desensitized conformation Q276 blocks L415 from flipping back, it remains trapped in the desensitized state. This proposed mechanism explains why Q276G cannot close the valve because L415 can rotate back preventing desensitization. Conversely, when bulky side chains substitute Q276, rotation of N416 and L415 are hindered also preventing or slowing desensitization. Without full and sustained compression of the β11- β12 linker the gate remains open explaining the long mean open times of the mutants and absence of desensitization. This mechanism is also consistent with cross-linking of C276 with C416 or C415 both prevent rotation of residues in the β11- β12 linker leading to inhibition of desensitization.

Babini, Alternative splicing and interaction with di- and polyvalent cations control the dynamic range of acid-sensing ion channel 1 (ASIC1). 2002, Pubmed, Xenbase

Babini, Alternative splicing and interaction with di- and polyvalent cations control the dynamic range of acid-sensing ion channel 1 (ASIC1). 2002, Pubmed , Xenbase
Baconguis, X-ray structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1-snake toxin complex reveals open state of a Na(+)-selective channel. 2014, Pubmed
Baconguis, Structural plasticity and dynamic selectivity of acid-sensing ion channel-spider toxin complexes. 2012, Pubmed
Bähring, Mechanisms of closed-state inactivation in voltage-gated ion channels. 2011, Pubmed
Bonifacio, Protonation controls ASIC1a activity via coordinated movements in multiple domains. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Chen, The tarantula toxin psalmotoxin 1 inhibits acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 1a by increasing its apparent H+ affinity. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Coric, The extracellular domain determines the kinetics of desensitization in acid-sensitive ion channel 1. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Coryell, Targeting ASIC1a reduces innate fear and alters neuronal activity in the fear circuit. 2007, Pubmed
Cushman, A conformation change in the extracellular domain that accompanies desensitization of acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 3. 2007, Pubmed
Duan, Extracellular spermine exacerbates ischemic neuronal injury through sensitization of ASIC1a channels to extracellular acidosis. 2011, Pubmed
Esque, A novel evaluation of residue and protein volumes by means of Laguerre tessellation. 2010, Pubmed
Friese, Acid-sensing ion channel-1 contributes to axonal degeneration in autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system. 2007, Pubmed
Gonzales, Pore architecture and ion sites in acid-sensing ion channels and P2X receptors. 2009, Pubmed
Jasti, Structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1 at 1.9 A resolution and low pH. 2007, Pubmed
Krauson, The Thumb Domain Mediates Acid-sensing Ion Channel Desensitization. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Li, Asn415 in the beta11-beta12 linker decreases proton-dependent desensitization of ASIC1. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Li, Leu85 in the beta1-beta2 linker of ASIC1 slows activation and decreases the apparent proton affinity by stabilizing a closed conformation. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Liechti, A combined computational and functional approach identifies new residues involved in pH-dependent gating of ASIC1a. 2010, Pubmed
Paukert, Identification of the Ca2+ blocking site of acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 1: implications for channel gating. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Roy, Molecular determinants of desensitization in an ENaC/degenerin channel. 2013, Pubmed
Springauf, The interaction between two extracellular linker regions controls sustained opening of acid-sensing ion channel 1. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sutherland, Acid-sensing ion channel 3 matches the acid-gated current in cardiac ischemia-sensing neurons. 2001, Pubmed
Vullo, Conformational dynamics and role of the acidic pocket in ASIC pH-dependent gating. 2017, Pubmed
Waldmann, A proton-gated cation channel involved in acid-sensing. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wang, Fear extinction requires ASIC1a-dependent regulation of hippocampal-prefrontal correlates. 2018, Pubmed
Wemmie, Acid-sensing ion channel 1 is localized in brain regions with high synaptic density and contributes to fear conditioning. 2003, Pubmed
Wemmie, The acid-activated ion channel ASIC contributes to synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory. 2002, Pubmed
Xiong, Neuroprotection in ischemia: blocking calcium-permeable acid-sensing ion channels. 2004, Pubmed
Yang, Ion conduction and selectivity in acid-sensing ion channel 1. 2014, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yoder, Gating mechanisms of acid-sensing ion channels. 2018, Pubmed
Yu, The acid-sensing ion channel ASIC1a mediates striatal synapse remodeling and procedural motor learning. 2018, Pubmed
Yu, A nonproton ligand sensor in the acid-sensing ion channel. 2010, Pubmed
Zhang, Single channel properties of rat acid-sensitive ion channel-1alpha, -2a, and -3 expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 2002, Pubmed , Xenbase