Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species.
Mungall CJ
,
Gkoutos GV
,
Smith CL
,
Haendel MA
,
Lewis SE
,
Ashburner M
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Phenotype ontologies are typically constructed to serve the needs of a particular community, such as annotation of genotype-phenotype associations in mouse or human. Here we demonstrate how these ontologies can be improved through assignment of logical definitions using a core ontology of phenotypic qualities and multiple additional ontologies from the Open Biological Ontologies library. We also show how these logical definitions can be used for data integration when combined with a unified multi-species anatomy ontology.
Figure 1. OBO-registered ontologies of physical objects, from the molecular scale up to gross anatomical scale. Above the cellular level, anatomical ontologies are partitioned taxonomically (the full breadth of taxonomic coverage in OBO is not shown). For mammals there is a second bipartite division, between fully formed structures and developing structures. The former are represented in the Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) and the adult Mouse Anatomy (MA), and the latter in the Edinburgh Human Developmental Anatomy (EHDA) and the Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Project (EMAP) ontologies.
Figure 2. Example portion of the MP, and the equivalence relations between MP classes and EQ descriptions. Paths to the root over is_a links from 'Purkinje cell degeneration' and siblings. The is_a hierarchy is used for query-answering and genotype-phenotype analysis. Queries for 'neurodegeneration' or 'abnormal neuron morphology' should return genes or genotypes associated with 'Purkinje cell degeneration', such as the Pten gene. Note that prior to December 2008 MP lacked the highlighted link (indicated with the asterisk between two bold boxes), which resulted in false negatives for queries to 'neurodegeneration'. Using automated reasoning we were able to infer this link from the logical definitions and associated ontologies. We presented our results to the MP editors, who subsequently amended the ontology to include the link.
Figure 3. Equivalence relations between MP classes and EQ descriptions. Equivalence relations between two MP classes and their equivalent EQ descriptions. Here we treat MP 'degeneration' terms as in the PATO quality (Q) 'degenerate', rather than the process of degeneration. Here the bearer entities (E) are represented in the OBO Cell Ontology (CL). The EQ notation can be translated to logical expressions using Table 2. The dotted line indicates a relationship in the MP that can be independently inferred by a reasoner. CNS, central nervous system.
Figure 4. Process and anatomical phenotypes. (a) MP mixes process and anatomical/morphology phenotypes in the same is_a hierarchy. (b) MP-XP maps these to GO-BP and MA based descriptions respectively. (c) GO-BP to Uberon mappings make the link between the process class 'tooth development' and the general anatomical class 'tooth' explicit. (d) Uberon declaration stating that a mouse tooth is a subclass of the more general 'tooth' class.
Ashburner,
Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.
2000, Pubmed
Ashburner,
Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.
2000,
Pubmed
Baldock,
EMAP and EMAGE: a framework for understanding spatially organized data.
2003,
Pubmed
Bard,
An ontology for cell types.
2005,
Pubmed
Beck,
Practical application of ontologies to annotate and analyse large scale raw mouse phenotype data.
2009,
Pubmed
Bug,
The NIFSTD and BIRNLex vocabularies: building comprehensive ontologies for neuroscience.
2008,
Pubmed
Collins,
The Human Genome Project: lessons from large-scale biology.
2003,
Pubmed
Day-Richter,
OBO-Edit--an ontology editor for biologists.
2007,
Pubmed
Degtyarenko,
ChEBI: a database and ontology for chemical entities of biological interest.
2008,
Pubmed
Gkoutos,
Using ontologies to describe mouse phenotypes.
2005,
Pubmed
Grumbling,
FlyBase: anatomical data, images and queries.
2006,
Pubmed
Hayamizu,
The Adult Mouse Anatomical Dictionary: a tool for annotating and integrating data.
2005,
Pubmed
Hoehndorf,
Representing default knowledge in biomedical ontologies: application to the integration of anatomy and phenotype ontologies.
2007,
Pubmed
Khaja,
Genome assembly comparison identifies structural variants in the human genome.
2006,
Pubmed
Mabee,
Phenotype ontologies: the bridge between genomics and evolution.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Maglia,
An anatomical ontology for amphibians.
2007,
Pubmed
Mungall,
Obol: integrating language and meaning in bio-ontologies.
2004,
Pubmed
Mungall,
Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Natale,
Framework for a protein ontology.
2007,
Pubmed
Robinson,
The Human Phenotype Ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease.
2008,
Pubmed
Rosse,
A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy.
2003,
Pubmed
Smith,
The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a tool for annotating, analyzing and comparing phenotypic information.
2005,
Pubmed
Smith,
The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Smith,
Relations in biomedical ontologies.
2005,
Pubmed
Sprague,
The Zebrafish Information Network: the zebrafish model organism database provides expanded support for genotypes and phenotypes.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Washington,
Linking human diseases to animal models using ontology-based phenotype annotation.
2009,
Pubmed
Yamazaki,
Biological ontologies in rice databases. An introduction to the activities in Gramene and Oryzabase.
2005,
Pubmed
Yandell,
Genome-wide analysis of human disease alleles reveals that their locations are correlated in paralogous proteins.
2008,
Pubmed