Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Nucleic Acids Res
2005 Jun 10;3310:3424-34. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki663.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Alteration of the nucleosomal DNA path in the crystal structure of a human nucleosome core particle.
Tsunaka Y
,
Kajimura N
,
Tate S
,
Morikawa K
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Gene expression in eukaryotes depends upon positioning, mobility and packaging of nucleosomes; thus, we need the detailed information of the human nucleosome core particle (NCP) structure, which could clarify chromatin properties. Here, we report the 2.5 A crystal structure of a human NCP. The overall structure is similar to those of other NCPs reported previously. However, the DNA path of human NCP is remarkably different from that taken within other NCPs with an identical DNA sequence. A comparison of the structural parameters between human and Xenopus laevis DNA reveals that the DNA path of human NCP consecutively shifts by 1 bp in the regions of superhelix axis location -5.0 to -2.0 and 5.0 to 7.0. This alteration of the human DNA path is caused predominantly by tight DNA-DNA contacts within the crystal. It is also likely that the conformational change in the human H2Btail induces the local alteration of the DNA path. In human NCP, the region with the altered DNA path lacks Mn2+ ions and the B-factors of the DNA phosphate groups are substantially high. Therefore, in contrast to the histone octamer, the nucleosomal DNA is sufficiently flexible and mobile and can undergo drastic conformational changes, depending upon the environment.
Figure 1. The overall structure of a human NCP. The upper ribbon model is the crystal structure of a human NCP. The arrow above NCP indicates a pseudo 2-fold axis passing through the center of the structure. The bottom figure displays the axial view of the particle. Histone chains are colored blue for H3, green for H4, yellow for H2A and red for H2B. The DNA is shown in ribbon traces for the 146 bp DNA phosphodiester backbones (brown for the I chain and forest green for the J chain). The Mn2+ and Clâ ions are depicted by cyan and silver balls, respectively.
Figure 2. Comparison of the DNA parameters between human and X.laevis NCPs. (A) B-factors of phosphates, metal binding sites, r.m.s.d. values and twist base-pair-step parameter of the 146 bp DNA compared between human and X.laevis NCPs. The base pair numbers (â72 to 73) and SHL (â7 to 7) labels are the same as those in the earlier structures (11,12). The primary bound-phosphate groups are indicated above the base sequence by the pointers showing the strand direction (dark, 3â²â5â²; light, 5â²â3â²) and the interacting histone motif (L1, loop1; L2, loop 2; A1, α1). B-factors (â«2) are plotted for the 5â² phosphate group of each base (brown for the I chain and forest green for the J chain). Mn2+ binding sites are indicated above the base sequence by the yellow and light blue arrows (solid, binding the DNA major groove; broken, binding the DNA minor groove) in the structures of human and X.laevis NCPs (PDB code 1KX3) (11), respectively. The r.m.s.d. values below the base sequence were calculated by the superposition of 18 or 19 bp between two NCPs. The twist base-pair-step parameters were plotted as open circles and closed squares for the human (yellow line) and X.laevis (light blue line) nucleosomal DNA, respectively. The pink, orange and green ellipsoids of the twist parameters represent the corresponding regions illustrated by those in Figures 3A and B and Figure 4A. (BâD) The simplified stereo model of the DNA duplexes in the regions surrounded by the ellipsoids in (A). The differences in helical twist are shown by the superposition between human (yellow) and X.laevis (light blue; PDB code 1KX3) (11) NCPs, based on the histone octamers alone. Numbers presented for each base pair are the same as those in Figure 2A.
Figure 3. Comparison of the DNA structures between human and X.laevis NCPs. The best superposition between human (yellow) and X.laevis (light blue; PDB code 1KX3) (11) NCPs, based on the histone octamers alone, reveals the discrepancy in the DNA structures. (A and B) Partial NCP structure, viewed as the upper display in Figure 1, but showing only 77 bp and associated proteins. The black arrows indicate the directions and ranges of the consecutive 1 bp shifts to the 3â²-side, in comparison with the DNA in Xla-NCP. The pink, orange and green circles correspond to those in Figures 2A and 4A. Each SHL label of â1 to â7 or 1 to 7 represents one further DNA double helix turn from SHL0, which is located at the central base pair numbering as zero in Figure 2A. The close-up inset indicates a H2B tail, whose positional change may induce the local alteration of the DNA path. In the close-up stereo view, all of the atoms of a human NCP are shown as normal sticks, where the phosphorus, oxygen and nitrogen atoms are colored cyan, red and blue, respectively, and all of the Xla-NCP atoms are shown as light blue sticks. (C) The side stereo view, corresponding to the lower display in Figure 1, but representing the superhelical DNA pathway alone. The broken ellipsoids, shadowed yellow and light blue, represent the space between two DNA duplexes within human and X.laevis NCPs, respectively. The black arrows indicate the expanding distance between the same sugarâphosphate backbones of two NCPs.
Figure 4. Crystal packing of human NCP. (A) The upper stereo model shows the human NCP crystal packing, viewed approximately perpendicular to the crystallographic c-axis. The bottom figure displays the side view of the same molecular arrangements. Short arrows show the approximate locations of the three crystallographic axes. Only the DNA backbone is shown for clarity. The pink, orange and green circles are equivalent with the regions illustrated by those in Figures 2A and Figures 3A and B. The black arrows indicate the directions and ranges of the consecutive 1 bp shifts to the 3â²-side. (BâD) The close-up stereo views of the boxed area in (A) show the discrepancy in the DNA structures by the superposition between human (yellow) and X.laevis (light blue; PDB code 1KX3) (11) NCPs, based on the histone octamers alone. The gray arrows represent the modification of the DNA pathway by the inter-particle collides.
Figure 5. Details of the DNAâDNA contact within the human NCP crystal. (A) Detailed stereo view of the DNAâDNA contact shown in Figure 4B and C. (B) Detailed stereo view of the DNAâcationâDNA contact shown in Figure 4D. All of the atoms of the DNA duplexes are shown as normal sticks, where the phosphorus, oxygen and nitrogen atoms are colored cyan, red and blue, respectively. The Mn2+ ions and the water molecules are depicted by black and red balls, respectively. Broken lines and distances between two atoms show possible interactions through water molecules. Numbers presented for each base pair are the same as those in Figure 2A.
Albig,
Isolation and characterization of two human H1 histone genes within clusters of core histone genes.
1991, Pubmed
Albig,
Isolation and characterization of two human H1 histone genes within clusters of core histone genes.
1991,
Pubmed
Baxevanis,
Histone Sequence Database: new histone fold family members.
1998,
Pubmed
Becker,
Nucleosome sliding: facts and fiction.
2002,
Pubmed
Becker,
ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling.
2002,
Pubmed
Berger,
Histone modifications in transcriptional regulation.
2002,
Pubmed
Brünger,
Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination.
1998,
Pubmed
Cosgrove,
Regulated nucleosome mobility and the histone code.
2004,
Pubmed
Cosma,
Ordered recruitment: gene-specific mechanism of transcription activation.
2002,
Pubmed
Davey,
Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 a resolution.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Davey,
DNA-dependent divalent cation binding in the nucleosome core particle.
2002,
Pubmed
Dorigo,
Nucleosome arrays reveal the two-start organization of the chromatin fiber.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dyer,
Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA.
2004,
Pubmed
Finch,
X-ray diffraction study of a new crystal form of the nucleosome core showing higher resolution.
1981,
Pubmed
Glusker,
Structural aspects of metal liganding to functional groups in proteins.
1991,
Pubmed
Harp,
Asymmetries in the nucleosome core particle at 2.5 A resolution.
2000,
Pubmed
Holm,
Structural and Functional Aspects of Metal Sites in Biology.
1996,
Pubmed
Horn,
Molecular biology. Chromatin higher order folding--wrapping up transcription.
2002,
Pubmed
Hörz,
Deoxyribonuclease II as a probe for chromatin structure. I. Location of cleavage sites.
1980,
Pubmed
Hörz,
Deoxyribonuclease II as a probe for chromatin structure. II. Mode of cleavage.
1980,
Pubmed
Jenuwein,
Translating the histone code.
2001,
Pubmed
Jones,
Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models.
1991,
Pubmed
Kornberg,
Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome.
1999,
Pubmed
Lavery,
The definition of generalized helicoidal parameters and of axis curvature for irregular nucleic acids.
1988,
Pubmed
Lenfant,
All four core histone N-termini contain sequences required for the repression of basal transcription in yeast.
1996,
Pubmed
Luger,
Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.
1997,
Pubmed
Luger,
Structure and dynamic behavior of nucleosomes.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Luger,
Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Martinez-Campa,
Precise nucleosome positioning and the TATA box dictate requirements for the histone H4 tail and the bromodomain factor Bdf1.
2004,
Pubmed
Otwinowski,
Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode.
1997,
Pubmed
Pettersen,
UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.
2004,
Pubmed
Piñeiro,
Yeast nucleosomal particles: structural and transcriptional properties.
1991,
Pubmed
Richmond,
The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core.
2003,
Pubmed
Schwarz,
Reversible oligonucleosome self-association: dependence on divalent cations and core histone tail domains.
1996,
Pubmed
Simpson,
Nucleosome positioning: occurrence, mechanisms, and functional consequences.
1991,
Pubmed
Soutoglou,
Coordination of PIC assembly and chromatin remodeling during differentiation-induced gene activation.
2002,
Pubmed
Tereshko,
Detection of alkali metal ions in DNA crystals using state-of-the-art X-ray diffraction experiments.
2001,
Pubmed
Timsit,
Self-fitting and self-modifying properties of the B-DNA molecule.
1995,
Pubmed
Timsit,
DNA self-fitting: the double helix directs the geometry of its supramolecular assembly.
1994,
Pubmed
Urnov,
Methylation and the genome: the power of a small amendment.
2002,
Pubmed
White,
Structure of the yeast nucleosome core particle reveals fundamental changes in internucleosome interactions.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Widom,
Structure, dynamics, and function of chromatin in vitro.
1998,
Pubmed
Wolffe,
The nucleosome: a powerful regulator of transcription.
1998,
Pubmed
Wyrick,
Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast.
1999,
Pubmed
Zhong,
The primary structure and expression of four cloned human histone genes.
1983,
Pubmed