Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
During Xenopus gastrulation alpha5beta1 integrin function is modulated in a temporally and spatially restricted manner, however, the regulatory mechanisms behind this regulation remain uncharacterized. Here we report that XGIPC/kermit2 binds to the cytoplasmic domain of the alpha5 subunit and regulates the activity of alpha5beta1 integrin. The interaction of kermit2 with alpha5beta1 is essential for fibronectin (FN) matrix assembly during the early stages of gastrulation. We further demonstrate that kermit2 regulates alpha5beta1 integrin endocytosis downstream of activin signaling. Inhibition of kermit2 function impairs cell migration but not adhesion to FN substrates indicating that integrin recycling is essential for mesoderm cell migration. Furthermore, we find that the alpha5beta1 integrin is colocalized with kermit2 and Rab 21 in embryonic and XTC cells. These data support a model where region specific mesoderm induction acts through kermit2 to regulate the temporally and spatially restricted changes in adhesive properties of the alpha5beta1 integrin through receptor endocytosis.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
20498857
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC2871791 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One
Figure 2. Kermit2mut inhibits Xenopus gastrulation. (A) Control embryos injected with water close their blastopores and (D) assemble a dense FN matrix. (B) Embryos injected with kermit2 also gastrulate and (E) assemble FN matrix normally. (C) Embryos injected with kermit2mut mRNA fail to close the blastopore and (F) have a sparse FN matrix. (G) Xbra in situ hybridizations indicate normal mesodermal patterning in (G) control embryos, as well as (H) embryos expressing kermit2, and in embryos expressing (I) kermit2mut. Note that axial extension is inhibited in (I). (J) Western blot demonstrating equal expression of HA tagged kermit2 and kermit2 constructs. Embryos injected with water (cont) do not express the construct, while embryos injected with RNA encoding kermit2 (k2) and kermit2mut (k2mut) express equal amounts of either construct. Molecular mass markers are indicated on the right of the panel. (K) Kermit2mut expression does not inhibit FN protein accumulation. Western blots demonstrate that there is no substantial change in FN protein expression (FN) in water injected embryos (cont), embryos expressing kermit2 (k2), or embryos expressing kermit2mut (k2mut). Molecular mass markers are indicated on the right of the panel. (A) size marker = 200 mM. (D) size marker = 30 mM. (G) size marker 100 mM.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010665.g002
Figure 4. Morpholino knock down of kermit2 inhibits gastrulation and FN matrix assembly. (A) Ventral view of stage 12 embryos. (D) Late gastrula stage BCR stained for FN. (A) Stage 12 control embryos gastrulate normally and (D) assemble a dense FN matrix. Embryos injected with 20 ng of Kermit2 5 mismatch control morpholino (COMO; B) gastrulate normally, and (E) exhibit a small decrease in FN matrix assembly. (C) Embryos injected with kermit2 inhibiting morpholino (MO) exhibit delayed blastopore closure and (F) a sparse FN matrix network. (G) Western blot of kermit2 expression. Kermit2 is expressed throughout early development. (H) Morpholino knock down of kermit2 in stage 11 embryos. 30 ng of control morpholino (CO 30) has no effect on Kermit2 expression. The Kermit morpholino at 10 ng and 20 ng (MO 10 and MO 20) decreases kermit2 expression below control levels. Molecular mass is indicated to the left of the panel. (A) size marker = 200 mm. (D) size marker = 30 mm.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010665.g004
Figure 5. Expression of kermit2 mRNA rescues morpholino knock down of kermit2. (A) Ventral view of stage 12 embryos. (E) Late gastrula stage BCR stained for FN. (A) Stage 12 control embryos gastrulate normally and (E) assemble a dense FN matrix. Embryos injected with 10 ng of Kermit2 morpholino (MO; B) gastrulate normally, and (F) exhibit a small decrease in FN matrix assembly. (C) Embryos injected with kermit2 inhibiting morpholino and kermit2 mRNA (MO+kermit2) exhibit a small delay in blastopore closure and (G) a partial rescue of FN matrix assembly. (D) Embryos injected with the kermit2 morpholino and the dominant negative kermit2 construct (MO+kermit2mut) exhibit delayed blastopore closure and (H) significant reduction in FN matrix assembly. (A) size marker = 200 mm. (E) size marker = 30 mm.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010665.g005
Figure 6. Inhibition of FN matrix assembly is not due to IGF signaling. (A, B) Control embryos close the blastopore by stage 12 and elaborate a dense FN matrix. (C, D) Embryos expressing a dominant negative IGFR-1 construct (dnIGFR-1) appear similar to control embryos and elaborate a dense FN matrix. (E) Xbra expression in control embryos. (F) Xbra patterning is not altered by blocking IGF signaling. There is a minor effect on axial extension that is clearly revealed in tadpoles (G) Control tadpoles (top) are longer than tadpoles resulting from embryos expressing dnIGFR-1 (middle). The dnIGFR-1 construct results in anterior defects including reduced or absent eyes (arrowhead). Tadpoles obtained from embryos that express kermit2mut show severe anterior truncations and mesodermal defects (bottom). (H) Western blots demonstrating inhibition of IGF signaling by the dnIGFR-1 construct. The phosphorylation of Akt (pAkt) seen in controls (cont) is not maintained in animal caps that express the dominant negative IGFR-1 construct (dnIGFR). Bottom panel shows total Akt expression in the same lysate. Molecular mass is indicated to the left of the panel.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010665.g006
Figure 1. Kermit2 interacts with the cytoplasmic domain of the α5 and α6 integrin subunits.(A) Yeast two two-hybrid assays were conducted using α5, α6 and αV cytoplasmic domains as bait in combination with kermit2 or kermit2mut as prey. The data is presented as average normalized β-galactosidase activity (±SD). The interaction of kermit2 with α5 and α6 is abolished by the AEEL mutation in kermit2mut (* P<0.002). The αV subunit does not interact with kermit2 or kermit2mut (** indicates P<0.001 between α5 or α6 and αV bait constructs). (B) GST pulldowns. HA tagged Kermit2 is detected in lysates (lane 1 input), and is pulled down with a GST-α5 fusion construct (lane 2 GST-α5). Most of the kermit2 remains in the supernatant (lane 3 sup). A control GST-β1 construct (lane 5 GST-β1) does not pull Kermit2 from lysates (lane 4 input, lane 6 sup). (C) Coimmunoprecipitation of kermit2 with α5β1 integrin. HA tagged kermit2 is detected in lysates (lane 1 input). Kermit2 is found in association with immunoprecipitated α5β1 (lane 2 P8D4), while a significant portion of kermit2 remains in the supernatant (sup).
Figure 3. Animal cap assays (A, C, E) minus activin or (B, D, F) plus activin.(A, B) Control activin-treated animal caps extend. (C, D) Kermit2 has no effect on activin-treated animal cap extension. (E, F) Kermit2mut inhibits activin-treated animal cap elongation. Size marker â=â100 µM.
Figure 7. Cell adhesion assays.(AâC) Spider graphs representing migration tracks of individual cells plated on FN substrates. Each graph contains 4 representative tracks with the start point set to (0,0). Horizontal and vertical scale is in µM. (C) Kermit2mut expressing cells have reduced migration paths as compared to (A) control and (B) kermit2 expressing cells. (D) Quantification of activin-treated cell adhesion to FN substrates. Cells were plated on FN substrates and counted pre-wash (blue) and after washing to remove non-adherent cells (red). Control, kermit2, and kermit2mut expressing cells all show similar affinity for FN substrates. (E) Activin-treated cell migration rate mediated by kermit2. Average cell migration velocities were measured using the track cells function of Openlab. The value for each construct represents the average (±SD) of 45 cells from three spawnings. Cells expressing the kermit2mut construct (0.6 µM/hr) migrate significantly (P<0.005) slower than control (91 µM/hr) or kermit2 (97 µM/hr) expressing cells. (F) The radial displacement of activin-treated cells on FN substrates. Measurements are from the same cells as represented in (E). Kermit2mut expressing cells travel significantly (P<0.01) less distance (32 µM) than control (148 µM) or kermit2 expressing cells (147 µM).
Figure 8. Kermit2 regulates internalization of antibody bound α5β1 integrin.Xenopus A6 cells were transfected with (A) GFP-tagged kermit2, or (B) GFP-tagged kermit2mut and the endocytosis of antibody labeled α5β1 was estimated from fluorescent intensity using the density slice function of Openlab. (C, D) Staining of internalized α5β1 with fluorescent anti-mouse antibody. Non-transfected cells in the same dish act as controls. Insets in C and D represent 25 µM2 ROI's used to estimate pixel densities. (A, C) Kermit2 transfected cells have 827.3±23.0 pixels/ROI as compared to control cell ROI pixel densities of 841.5±13.3 pixels/ROI. (B, D) In kermit2mut transfected cells the ROI pixel density is 530.8±51.2, while in non-transfected cells from the same dish have an average pixel density of 832.5±24.3 pixels/ROI. Pixel densities represent averages (±SD) from 10 individual cells from 4 separate transfections. Size marker â=â25 µM.
Figure 10. Colocalization of α5β1, kermit2, and Rab 21 in Xenopus embryonic cells.Activin-treated embryonic cells were plated on FN substrates and stained for α5β1 (green), or kermit2 (red D), or Rab 21 (red H). (A, E) DIC images of adherent cells, boxes represent areas magnified in BâD and FâH. (AâD) Integrin (C; green) and kermit2 (D; red) colocalize at sites of adhesion (arrowheads in BâD). (EâH) Rab 21 (H; red) and integrin (G; green) colocalize in embryonic cells (arrowheads in FâH). Staining of cells with secondary antibodies alone produced no detectable signal. Size marker â=â25 µM.
Figure 11. Colocalization of α5β1, kermit2, and Rab 21 in Xenopus XTC cells.XTC cells were stained for α5β1 (green), or kermit2 (red D), or Rab 21 (red H). (A, E) DIC images of adherent cells, boxes represent areas magnified in BâD and FâH. (AâD) Integrin (C; green) and kermit2 (D; red) colocalize in numerous vesicles and at focal adhesions (arrowheads in BâD). (EâH) Rab 21 (H; red) and integrin (G; green) colocalize in cytoplasmic vesicles and focal adhesions (arrowheads in FâH). Staining of cells with secondary antibodies alone produced no detectable signal. Size marker â=â25 µM.
Aota,
The short amino acid sequence Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn in human fibronectin enhances cell-adhesive function.
1994, Pubmed
Aota,
The short amino acid sequence Pro-His-Ser-Arg-Asn in human fibronectin enhances cell-adhesive function.
1994,
Pubmed
Banno,
Integrin activation.
2008,
Pubmed
Blobe,
A novel mechanism for regulating transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) signaling. Functional modulation of type III TGF-beta receptor expression through interaction with the PDZ domain protein, GIPC.
2001,
Pubmed
Booth,
GIPC participates in G protein signaling downstream of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bowditch,
Identification of a novel integrin binding site in fibronectin. Differential utilization by beta 3 integrins.
1994,
Pubmed
Bretscher,
Endocytosis and recycling of the fibronectin receptor in CHO cells.
1989,
Pubmed
Burke,
Complexity in the spindle checkpoint.
2000,
Pubmed
Caswell,
Rab25 associates with alpha5beta1 integrin to promote invasive migration in 3D microenvironments.
2007,
Pubmed
Chomczynski,
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
1987,
Pubmed
Cohen,
Active zones on motor nerve terminals contain alpha 3beta 1 integrin.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Cousin,
PACSIN2 regulates cell adhesion during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Davidson,
Mesendoderm extension and mantle closure in Xenopus laevis gastrulation: combined roles for integrin alpha(5)beta(1), fibronectin, and tissue geometry.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
DeSimone,
The Xenopus embryo as a model system for the study of cell-extracellular matrix interactions.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
DeSimone,
Using Xenopus embryos to investigate integrin function.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dzamba,
Cadherin adhesion, tissue tension, and noncanonical Wnt signaling regulate fibronectin matrix organization.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
El Mourabit,
The PDZ domain of TIP-2/GIPC interacts with the C-terminus of the integrin alpha5 and alpha6 subunits.
2002,
Pubmed
Favre-Bonvin,
Human papillomavirus type 18 E6 protein binds the cellular PDZ protein TIP-2/GIPC, which is involved in transforming growth factor beta signaling and triggers its degradation by the proteasome.
2005,
Pubmed
Gao,
Synectin, syndecan-4 cytoplasmic domain binding PDZ protein, inhibits cell migration.
2000,
Pubmed
Gawantka,
A beta 1-integrin associated alpha-chain is differentially expressed during Xenopus embryogenesis.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gyuris,
Cdi1, a human G1 and S phase protein phosphatase that associates with Cdk2.
1993,
Pubmed
Hens,
Regulation of Xenopus embryonic cell adhesion by the small GTPase, rac.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hynes,
Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines.
2002,
Pubmed
Katoh,
GIPC gene family (Review).
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lee,
Temporal and spatial regulation of fibronectin in early Xenopus development.
1984,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Legate,
Genetic and cell biological analysis of integrin outside-in signaling.
2009,
Pubmed
Liu,
PDZ domain protein GIPC interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of melanosomal membrane protein gp75 (tyrosinase-related protein-1).
2001,
Pubmed
Marsden,
Regulation of cell polarity, radial intercalation and epiboly in Xenopus: novel roles for integrin and fibronectin.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Marsden,
Integrin-ECM interactions regulate cadherin-dependent cell adhesion and are required for convergent extension in Xenopus.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Memmo,
The alphavbeta5 integrin functions as an endocytic receptor for vitronectin.
1998,
Pubmed
Na,
Differential regulation of cell adhesive functions by integrin alpha subunit cytoplasmic tails in vivo.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Newport,
A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage.
1982,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pellinen,
Integrin traffic.
2006,
Pubmed
Pellinen,
Small GTPase Rab21 regulates cell adhesion and controls endosomal traffic of beta1-integrins.
2006,
Pubmed
Pera,
Neural and head induction by insulin-like growth factor signals.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pijuan-Thompson,
Ligation of integrin alpha5beta1 is required for internalization of vitronectin by integrin alphavbeta3.
1997,
Pubmed
Powelka,
Stimulation-dependent recycling of integrin beta1 regulated by ARF6 and Rab11.
2004,
Pubmed
Pudney,
Establishment of a cell line (XTC-2) from the South African clawed toad, Xenopus laevis.
1973,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ramis,
Xnrs and activin regulate distinct genes during Xenopus development: activin regulates cell division.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ramos,
Integrin-dependent adhesive activity is spatially controlled by inductive signals at gastrulation.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ramos,
Xenopus embryonic cell adhesion to fibronectin: position-specific activation of RGD/synergy site-dependent migratory behavior at gastrulation.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Saegusa,
The direct binding of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) to integrin alphavbeta3 is involved in IGF-1 signaling.
2009,
Pubmed
Semple,
An essential role for Orc6 in DNA replication through maintenance of pre-replicative complexes.
2006,
Pubmed
Shi,
Caveolin-1-dependent beta1 integrin endocytosis is a critical regulator of fibronectin turnover.
2008,
Pubmed
Smith,
Expression of a Xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Smith,
Identification of a potent Xenopus mesoderm-inducing factor as a homologue of activin A.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Smith,
Mesoderm induction and the control of gastrulation in Xenopus laevis: the roles of fibronectin and integrins.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Spicer,
Correction: Integrin α5β1 Function Is Regulated by XGIPC/kermit2 Mediated Endocytosis during Xenopus laevis Gastrulation.
2015,
Pubmed
Tan,
Kermit, a frizzled interacting protein, regulates frizzled 3 signaling in neural crest development.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tani,
PDZ interaction sites in integrin alpha subunits. T14853, TIP/GIPC binds to a type I recognition sequence in alpha 6A/alpha 5 and a novel sequence in alpha 6B.
2001,
Pubmed
Turner,
Expression of achaete-scute homolog 3 in Xenopus embryos converts ectodermal cells to a neural fate.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Valdembri,
Neuropilin-1/GIPC1 signaling regulates alpha5beta1 integrin traffic and function in endothelial cells.
2009,
Pubmed
Varrin,
A mutation in Dbf4 motif M impairs interactions with DNA replication factors and confers increased resistance to genotoxic agents.
2005,
Pubmed
Varsano,
GIPC is recruited by APPL to peripheral TrkA endosomes and regulates TrkA trafficking and signaling.
2006,
Pubmed
Wang,
A PDZ protein regulates the distribution of the transmembrane semaphorin, M-SemF.
1999,
Pubmed
White,
alpha v beta3 and alpha5beta1 integrin recycling pathways dictate downstream Rho kinase signaling to regulate persistent cell migration.
2007,
Pubmed
Wieman,
An essential role for the Glut1 PDZ-binding motif in growth factor regulation of Glut1 degradation and trafficking.
2009,
Pubmed
Winklbauer,
Differential interaction of Xenopus embryonic cells with fibronectin in vitro.
1988,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Winklbauer,
Fibronectin, mesoderm migration, and gastrulation in Xenopus.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Winklbauer,
Mesodermal cell migration during Xenopus gastrulation.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wu,
Kermit 2/XGIPC, an IGF1 receptor interacting protein, is required for IGF signaling in Xenopus eye development.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yi,
The role of the PDZ protein GIPC in regulating NMDA receptor trafficking.
2007,
Pubmed