Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The neural crest (NC) is a population of multipotent stem cell-like progenitors that arise at the neural plate border in vertebrates and migrate extensively before giving rise to diverse derivatives. A number of components of the neural crest gene regulatory network (NC-GRN) are used reiteratively to control multiple steps in the development of these cells. It is therefore important to understand the mechanisms that control the distinct function of reiteratively used factors in different cellular contexts, and an important strategy for doing so is to identify and characterize the regulatory factors they interact with. Here we report that the LIM adaptor protein, LMO4, is a Slug/Snail interacting protein that is essential for NC development. LMO4 is expressed in NC forming regions of the embryo, as well as in the central nervous system and the cranial placodes. LMO4 is necessary for normal NC development as morpholino-mediated knockdown of this factor leads to loss of NC precursor formation at the neural plate border. Misexpression of LMO4 leads to ectopic expression of some neural crest markers, but a reduction in the expression of others. LMO4 binds directly to Slug and Snail, but not to other components of the NC-GRN and can modulate Slug-mediated neural crest induction, suggesting a mechanistic link between these factors. Together these findings implicate LMO4 as a critical component of the NC-GRN and shed new light on the control of Snail family repressors.
Fig. 1. LMO4 is expressed in the neural crest. Schematic diagram showing LMO4 protein domains. (B) Whole mount in situ hybridization examining LMO4 expression in early Xenopus embryos. LMO4 expression in neural crest forming regions is apparent by stage 14, and is maintained in premigratory and migratory neural crest cells. LMO4 expression is also seen in the neural plate, placodal regions, and paraxial mesoderm at neurula stages (stages 149). At stage 24 LMO4 is expressed in the otic vesicle and tailbud in addition to migrating neural crest cells. At stage 28 LMO4 expression is seen in post-migratory neural crest cells in the branchial arches as well as in the tailbud, otic vesicle and somites.
Fig. 2. LMO4 is required for neural crest formation. (A) Whole mount in situ hybridization of embryos co-injected in one animal micromere at the eight-cell stage with LMO4 morpholino and β-gal as a lineage tracer. Embryos were examined at mid-neurula stage (St17) with neural crest markers Slug, Snail, Sox8, Twist, Sox10, FoxD3. * indicates side of injection which is also denoted by red gal staining. (B) Effects of LMO4 depletion can be rescued with a morpholino resistant form of LMO4 (LMO4 M1). Whole mount in situ hybridization injected probed for neural crest marker Slug. (C) Whole mount in situ of stage 13 LMO4 depleted embryos probed for neural plate marker Sox3, epidermal marker Epk, and neural plate border markers Opl, and Pax3. (D) In situs of LMO4 MO injected embryos probed for mesoderm marker MyoD. Normal expression of mesodermal markers indicates that effects of LMO4 depletion on the neural crest are not a consequence of mesodermal defects. (E) Animal cap assay demonstrating that mesoderm independent induction of neural crest by Wnt/Slug is blocked by LMO4 depletion. (F) Western blot analysis validating the knockdown of LMO4 immunoblotting with antibodies against the tagged protein. Actin is used as a loading control. (G) Western blot of in vitro translated (IVT) LMO4 proteins demonstrating that the mutant form is resistant to translation blocking morpholino.
Fig. 3. Excess LMO4 interferes with neural crest formation. (A) Whole mount in situ hybridization of embryos injected in one cell at two-cell stage with LMO4 and β-gal lineage tracer. Embryos were examined at mid-neurula stage (St. 17) with neural crest markers Slug and Snail, which display significant ectopic expression. B) Animal cap assay demonstrating that, in contrast to Wnt/noggin, LMO4 cannot induce Slug expression in isolated ectoderm. (C) Whole mount in situ hybridization of embryos injected in one cell at two-cell stage with mRNA encoding LMO4 and β-gal. Embryos were examined at mid-neurula stage (St. 17) with neural crest markers FoxD3, Sox8, Sox9, Sox10 and Twist expression of which, in contrast to Slug and Snail, were all inhibited by LMO4 misexpression. (D) In situ hybridization of stage 13 embryos injected with LMO4 and β-gal probed for neural plate marker Sox3, placodal markers Opl and Six1, epidermal marker Epk, and neural plate border markers Msx1 (St. 13). The expression of Slug and Snail is massively expanded while expression of other markers is inhibited. (E) TUNEL staining of stage 15 embryos injected with LMO4 MO, mRNA encoding LMO4, or apoptosis inducing factor DNMT3B1 (as a positive control). No significant changes in cell death were noted following either LMO4 up or down regulation. (F) phospho Histone H3 staining of stage 15 embryos injected with LMO4 MO or LMO4 mRNA. No significant changes in cell proliferation were noted following either LMO4 up or down regulation. * indicates injected side of embryo which is also marked by red gal staining.
Fig. 4. LMO4 forms a complex with Slug and Snail. (A) Co-immunoprecipitation (IP) assay probing the ability of LMO4 to interact with neural crest regulatory factors. Embryos were injected with mRNA encoding flag-tagged LMO4 and indicated myc-tagged neural crest transcription factors. Whole embryo lysates were prepared at stage 10.5, immunoprecipitated with α-flag antibodies, resolved by SDS page and subjected to western analysis using α-myc antibody. LMO4 interacts strongly with Slug and Snail but not Sox10, FoxD3 or Twist. (B) GST pull-down assay demonstrating that in vitro translated LMO4 protein directly interacts with GST-Slug, but not with GST alone.
Fig. 5. The LIM domains of LMO4 and the N-terminus of Slug are necessary for interaction. (A) Schematic of showing deletion mutants of LMO4, Slug, or Snail used in this study. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation (IP) assay probing the LMO4 domains required for interaction with Slug and Snail. Embryos were injected with mRNA encoding flag-tagged LMO4 constructs and myc-tagged Slug or Snail. α-flag IP followed by α-myc western shows that both LIM domains are required for robust interaction with Slug and Snail. (C) Co-immunoprecipitation assay using flag-tagged LMO4 and myc-tagged forms of either Slug (left panel) or Snail (right panel). Deletion of the Snag domain has a greater effect on the ability of Snail to interact with LMO4. (D) Co-immunoprecipitation assays comparing the ability of the full length or N-terminus of Slug (left panel) or Snail (right panel) to interact with LMO4, HDAC or Ajuba. Both Slug and Snail interact comparably with all three co-regulatory factors, but the Snag domain containing N-terminus is not sufficient for this interaction. Lower molecular weight bands on Snail immunoblot are common Snail degradation products.
Fig. 6. Slug and Snail utilize different domains to recruit Ajuba and HDAC. (A) Co-immunoprecipitation (IP) assay comparing the protein domains of (myc-tagged) Slug and Snail required for interaction with flag-tagged HDAC1 (A) or Ajuba (B). Deletion of the SNAG domain of Snail but not Slug, leads to loss of interaction with both HDAC1 and Ajuba. Conversely, the zinc finger domain of Slug, but not Snail, is sufficient for both interactions. These findings reveal novel differences in how Slug and Snail interaction with transcriptional co-regulatory factors.
Fig. 7. Functional roles for LMO4 in neural crest induction. (A) Co-IP assay demonstrating interaction between two LIM domain containing adaptor proteins, LMO4 and Ajuba. (B) Co-IP assay demonstrating that HDAC interacts strongly with Ajuba but not LMO4, indicating that the functions of these two adaptor proteins can be distinguished. Co-expression of LMO4 abrogates the interaction between Ajuba and HDAC, most likely by competing for Ajuba binding. (C) LMO4 is necessary for Slug/Snail-mediated, but not Sox10-mediated, neural crest induction. Whole mount in situ hybridization of embryos co-injected in one cell at the eight-cell stage with LMO4 morpholino and β-gal lineage tracer alone or in the presence of mRNA encoding Slug, Snail or Sox10. Embryos were examined at mid-neurula stages for expression of neural crest marker Sox10. Whereas all three NC regulatory factors can induce ectopic Sox10 expression, only Sox10 can do so in LMO4 depleted cells. These findings point to a more direct the role for LMO4 in the function of Slug and Snail.
Alberga,
The snail gene required for mesoderm formation in Drosophila is expressed dynamically in derivatives of all three germ layers.
1991, Pubmed
Alberga,
The snail gene required for mesoderm formation in Drosophila is expressed dynamically in derivatives of all three germ layers.
1991,
Pubmed
Alves,
Role of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulator Slug in primary human cancers.
2009,
Pubmed
Asprer,
LMO4 functions as a co-activator of neurogenin 2 in the developing cortex.
2011,
Pubmed
Ayyanathan,
The Ajuba LIM domain protein is a corepressor for SNAG domain mediated repression and participates in nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling.
2007,
Pubmed
Bach,
The LIM domain: regulation by association.
2000,
Pubmed
Batlle,
The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells.
2000,
Pubmed
Bellmeyer,
The protooncogene c-myc is an essential regulator of neural crest formation in xenopus.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Betancur,
Assembling neural crest regulatory circuits into a gene regulatory network.
2010,
Pubmed
Cano,
The transcription factor snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression.
2000,
Pubmed
Comijn,
The two-handed E box binding zinc finger protein SIP1 downregulates E-cadherin and induces invasion.
2001,
Pubmed
de la Calle-Mustienes,
Xenopus Xlmo4 is a GATA cofactor during ventral mesoderm formation and regulates Ldb1 availability at the dorsal mesoderm and the neural plate.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
del Barrio,
Overexpression of Snail family members highlights their ability to promote chick neural crest formation.
2002,
Pubmed
Dumont,
Sustained induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition activates DNA methylation of genes silenced in basal-like breast cancers.
2008,
Pubmed
Essex,
Expression of Xenopus snail in mesoderm and prospective neural fold ectoderm.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fujita,
MTA3, a Mi-2/NuRD complex subunit, regulates an invasive growth pathway in breast cancer.
2003,
Pubmed
Gammill,
Neural crest specification: migrating into genomics.
2003,
Pubmed
Grau,
Mutations and Chromosomal Rearrangements Affecting the Expression of Snail, a Gene Involved in Embryonic Patterning in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.
1984,
Pubmed
Grimes,
The Gfi-1 proto-oncoprotein contains a novel transcriptional repressor domain, SNAG, and inhibits G1 arrest induced by interleukin-2 withdrawal.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Grutz,
Identification of the LMO4 gene encoding an interaction partner of the LIM-binding protein LDB1/NLI1: a candidate for displacement by LMO proteins in T cell acute leukaemia.
1998,
Pubmed
Hajra,
The SLUG zinc-finger protein represses E-cadherin in breast cancer.
2002,
Pubmed
Heeg-Truesdell,
A slug, a fox, a pair of sox: transcriptional responses to neural crest inducing signals.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hemavathy,
Differential regulation of gastrulation and neuroectodermal gene expression by Snail in the Drosophila embryo.
1997,
Pubmed
Hemavathy,
Snail/slug family of repressors: slowly going into the fast lane of development and cancer.
2000,
Pubmed
Hemavathy,
Human Slug is a repressor that localizes to sites of active transcription.
2000,
Pubmed
Hou,
14-3-3 binding sites in the snail protein are essential for snail-mediated transcriptional repression and epithelial-mesenchymal differentiation.
2010,
Pubmed
Hou,
The LIM protein AJUBA recruits protein arginine methyltransferase 5 to mediate SNAIL-dependent transcriptional repression.
2008,
Pubmed
Kanungo,
Ajuba, a cytosolic LIM protein, shuttles into the nucleus and affects embryonal cell proliferation and fate decisions.
2000,
Pubmed
Kenny,
Identification and characterization of LMO4, an LMO gene with a novel pattern of expression during embryogenesis.
1998,
Pubmed
Knecht,
Induction of the neural crest: a multigene process.
2002,
Pubmed
Kudryavtseva,
Identification and characterization of Grainyhead-like epithelial transactivator (GET-1), a novel mammalian Grainyhead-like factor.
2003,
Pubmed
LaBonne,
Snail-related transcriptional repressors are required in Xenopus for both the induction of the neural crest and its subsequent migration.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
LaBonne,
Molecular mechanisms of neural crest formation.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
LaBonne,
Neural crest induction in Xenopus: evidence for a two-signal model.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lane,
Dynamic expression and regulation by Fgf8 and Pou2 of the zebrafish LIM-only gene, lmo4.
2002,
Pubmed
Langer,
Ajuba LIM proteins are snail/slug corepressors required for neural crest development in Xenopus.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Llorens,
Down-regulation of E-cadherin in mouse skin carcinoma cells enhances a migratory and invasive phenotype linked to matrix metalloproteinase-9 gelatinase expression.
1998,
Pubmed
Lu,
LMO4 can interact with Smad proteins and modulate transforming growth factor-beta signaling in epithelial cells.
2006,
Pubmed
Martin,
Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction.
2009,
Pubmed
Martin,
Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination.
2010,
Pubmed
Mayor,
Induction of the prospective neural crest of Xenopus.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
McCollum,
A zebrafish LMO4 ortholog limits the size of the forebrain and eyes through negative regulation of six3b and rx3.
2007,
Pubmed
Mizunuma,
The LIM-only protein, LMO4, and the LIM domain-binding protein, LDB1, expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity.
2003,
Pubmed
Nakayama,
The transition to endoreduplication in trophoblast giant cells is regulated by the mSNA zinc finger transcription factor.
1998,
Pubmed
Nibu,
Interaction of short-range repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the embryo.
1998,
Pubmed
Nieto,
Control of cell behavior during vertebrate development by Slug, a zinc finger gene.
1994,
Pubmed
Nieto,
The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors.
2002,
Pubmed
Novotny-Diermayr,
Modulation of the interleukin-6 receptor subunit glycoprotein 130 complex and its signaling by LMO4 interaction.
2005,
Pubmed
Nüsslein-Volhard,
Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle inDrosophila melanogaster : I. Zygotic loci on the second chromosome.
1984,
Pubmed
Peinado,
Snail mediates E-cadherin repression by the recruitment of the Sin3A/histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1)/HDAC2 complex.
2004,
Pubmed
Peinado,
Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype?
2007,
Pubmed
Perl,
A causal role for E-cadherin in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma.
1998,
Pubmed
Polyak,
Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits.
2009,
Pubmed
Sauka-Spengler,
A gene regulatory network orchestrates neural crest formation.
2008,
Pubmed
Sauka-Spengler,
Snapshot: neural crest.
2010,
Pubmed
Sefton,
Conserved and divergent roles for members of the Snail family of transcription factors in the chick and mouse embryo.
1998,
Pubmed
Setogawa,
The tumor suppressor LKB1 induces p21 expression in collaboration with LMO4, GATA-6, and Ldb1.
2006,
Pubmed
Shioiri,
Slug expression is an independent prognostic parameter for poor survival in colorectal carcinoma patients.
2006,
Pubmed
Spokony,
The transcription factor Sox9 is required for cranial neural crest development in Xenopus.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sum,
The LIM domain protein Lmo4 is highly expressed in proliferating mouse epithelial tissues.
2005,
Pubmed
Sum,
The LIM domain protein LMO4 interacts with the cofactor CtIP and the tumor suppressor BRCA1 and inhibits BRCA1 activity.
2002,
Pubmed
Taylor,
Modulating the activity of neural crest regulatory factors.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tucker,
Neural crest cells: a model for invasive behavior.
2004,
Pubmed
Uchikado,
Increased Slug and decreased E-cadherin expression is related to poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.
2011,
Pubmed
Vernon,
Slug stability is dynamically regulated during neural crest development by the F-box protein Ppa.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wang,
The LIM-only factor LMO4 regulates expression of the BMP7 gene through an HDAC2-dependent mechanism, and controls cell proliferation and apoptosis of mammary epithelial cells.
2007,
Pubmed
Wang,
Expression of an engrailed-LMO4 fusion protein in mammary epithelial cells inhibits mammary gland development in mice.
2004,
Pubmed
Yang,
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis.
2008,
Pubmed
Yu,
LIM only 4 is overexpressed in late stage pancreas cancer.
2008,
Pubmed
Yu,
let-7 regulates self renewal and tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells.
2007,
Pubmed
