Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
PLoS One
2012 Jan 01;73:e33346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033346.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Genomic targets of Brachyury (T) in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells.
Evans AL
,
Faial T
,
Gilchrist MJ
,
Down T
,
Vallier L
,
Pedersen RA
,
Wardle FC
,
Smith JC
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
BACKGROUND: The T-box transcription factor Brachyury (T) is essential for formation of the posterior mesoderm and the notochord in vertebrate embryos. Work in the frog and the zebrafish has identified some direct genomic targets of Brachyury, but little is known about Brachyury targets in the mouse.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we use chromatin immunoprecipitation and mouse promoter microarrays to identify targets of Brachyury in embryoid bodies formed from differentiating mouse ES cells. The targets we identify are enriched for sequence-specific DNA binding proteins and include components of signal transduction pathways that direct cell fate in the primitive streak and tailbud of the early embryo. Expression of some of these targets, such as Axin2, Fgf8 and Wnt3a, is down regulated in Brachyury mutant embryos and we demonstrate that they are also Brachyury targets in the human. Surprisingly, we do not observe enrichment of the canonical T-domain DNA binding sequence 5'-TCACACCT-3' in the vicinity of most Brachyury target genes. Rather, we have identified an (AC)(n) repeat sequence, which is conserved in the rat but not in human, zebrafish or Xenopus. We do not understand the significance of this sequence, but speculate that it enhances transcription factor binding in the regulatory regions of Brachyury target genes in rodents.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our work identifies the genomic targets of a key regulator of mesoderm formation in the early mouse embryo, thereby providing insights into the Brachyury-driven genetic regulatory network and allowing us to compare the function of Brachyury in different species.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
22479388
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC3316570 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Figure 1. Temporal expression pattern of Brachyury during early ES cell differentiation.The graph shows a quantitative RT-PCR profile from an embryoid body spinner culture. Brachyury expression is calculated relative to beta actin. Images show undifferentiated R1 cells on mouse embryo fibroblast feeders at day 0, early blast colonies at day 2, and embryoid bodies at days 3, 4 (when they are cross-linked) and 5.
Figure 2. Analysis of Brachyury targets.(A) Pie chart showing the times in development at which Brachyury target gene expression begins in the mouse embryo (as a percentage of total; nâ=â396). Most genes (63%) start to be expressed between E7.5, when Brachyury is expressed in the primitive streak, notochord and tailbud, and E17.5, when expression is restricted to trunkmesenchyme. Of targets showing this temporal expression pattern, 30% are restricted to mesodermal derivatives, as indicated in the bar chart to the right. Others are expressed in various combinations of ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm. (B) Temporal expression of transcription factor targets of Brachyury during ES cell differentiation in spinner culture, obtained by RT-PCR. The three panels in the top row were taken from a batch of cells in which Brachyury expression peaked at day 4 of culture; the rest were taken from a batch in which Brachyury expression peaked at day 3. All show means of triplicate measurements and are normalised to levels of beta actin. Foxa2 and Foxe1 in the top row peak with Brachyury at day 4; genes in the lower panel peak later than Brachyury.
Figure 3. Components of the Wnt pathway as Brachyury targets.(A) The Wnt signalling pathway. Arrows indicate positive interactions and bars represent negative interactions. Targets identified in this study are outlined in bold. (BâE) Brachyury binding in genomic regions around Dkk1 (B); Ctnnb1/β-catenin (C); Dvl3 (D); and γ-Catenin/jup/plakoglobin (E). Each target shows fold enrichment against chromosomal position. Blue bars represent the T box-like site TSACANNT (Nâ=âany base, Sâ=âG/C) and green bars represent (AC)n. Stars above bars represent sequence on the reverse strand. Plots are average of triplicate chip results, aligned to the mm8 Feb. 2006 assembly.
Figure 4. Analysis of Wnt3a, a positive regulator of the Wnt pathway.(A) Location analysis of Wnt3a. The figure (and Figs. 5, 6) shows fold enrichment against chromosomal position. Plot is the mean of triplicate chip results, aligned to the mm8 Feb. 2006 assembly. Blue bars represent the T box-like site TSACANNT (Nâ=âany base, Sâ=âG/C); green bars represent (AC)n; red bars the consensus TCACACCT. Stars above bars represent sequence on reverse strand. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR expression profile for Wnt3a during ES cell differentiation, expressed relative to beta actin. (C, D) Expression of Wnt3a studied by in situ hybridisation; in each, the top image shows a dorsal view, and the bottom image a lateral view. (C) Phenotypically wild type (+/+ or +/T) embryo at E8.5â8.75, and (D) a mutant (T/T) embryo from crosses of Brachyury heterozygous mutant mice. Wnt3a expression is detected with NBT/BCIP (purple) and the insets show a lateral view after double staining for Brachyury detected with INT/BCIP (orange brown). Note that in the wild type embryo Wnt3a is expressed in tailbud and paraxial mesoderm. In the mutant embryo expression of Wnt3a staining is absent or greatly reduced (nâ=â3). Scale bars indicate 250 µm.
Figure 5. Analysis of Axin2, a negative regulator of the Wnt pathway.(A) Location analysis of Axin2. For details see legend to Fig. 4. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR expression profile for Axin2 during ES cell differentiation, expressed relative to beta actin. (C, D) Expression of Axin2 studied by in situ hybridisation; in each, the top image shows a dorsal view, and the bottom image a lateral view. (C) Phenotypically wild type (+/+ or +/T) embryo at E8.5â8.75 and (D) a mutant (T/T) embryo, both derived from crosses of Brachyury heterozygous mutant mice. Axin2 expression is detected with NBT/BCIP (purple) and the insets show a lateral view after double staining for Brachyury detected with INT/BCIP (orange brown). Note that in the wild type embryo Axin2 is expressed in tailbud, paraxial mesoderm and lateral margin of the neural folds. In the mutant embryo expression of Axin2 is greatly reduced (nâ=â9). Scale bars are 250 µm.
Figure 6. Fgf8 as a target of Brachyury.(A) Location analysis of Fgf8. For details of methods see legend to Fig. 4. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR expression profile for Fgf8 during ES cell differentiation, expressed relative to beta actin. (C) Expression of Fgf8 studied by in situ hybridisation. The images show a phenotypically wild type (+/+ or +/T) embryo (top pair) and a mutant T/T (bottom pair) embryo derived from crosses of Brachyury heterozygous mutant mice. The wild type embryo is orientated with anterior to the left and posterior to the right; the mutant is viewed from the posterior. Fgf8 expression is detected with NBT/BCIP (purple) and Brachyury with INT/BCIP (orange brown). In the wild type embryo Fgf8 is expressed in the primitive streak and paraxial mesoderm; such expression is absent or greatly reduced in the mutant. Scale bars indicate 200 µm.
Figure 7. Conservation of BRACHYURY binding in the human genome.(A) ChIP-qPCR performed on samples from differentiated hECSs using a specific anti-BRACHYURY IgG and a non-specific control IgG. Graph shows enrichment for regulatory regions of Brachyury targets (AXIN2, FGF8, JUP, WNT3A) and a negative control region (NCAPD2). Results are expressed relative to input chromatin divided by the enrichment for the non-specific control antibody. (B) BRACHYURY binding in the human genome. The short red lines below the chromosomal coordinates (hg19) depict the position of the PCR amplicons relative to the beginning of the human genes (blue). The three bottom tracks show the genome sequence conservation between human and mouse, zebrafish and vertebrate genomes (Genome Browser, http://genome.ucsc.edu/).
Anderson,
The onset of germ cell migration in the mouse embryo.
2000, Pubmed
Anderson,
The onset of germ cell migration in the mouse embryo.
2000,
Pubmed
Armstrong,
The expression of the Wilms' tumour gene, WT1, in the developing mammalian embryo.
1993,
Pubmed
Aulehla,
Wnt3a plays a major role in the segmentation clock controlling somitogenesis.
2003,
Pubmed
Badis,
Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors.
2009,
Pubmed
Bernardo,
BRACHYURY and CDX2 mediate BMP-induced differentiation of human and mouse pluripotent stem cells into embryonic and extraembryonic lineages.
2011,
Pubmed
Bernemann,
Distinct developmental ground states of epiblast stem cell lines determine different pluripotency features.
2011,
Pubmed
Brown,
Activin/Nodal signaling controls divergent transcriptional networks in human embryonic stem cells and in endoderm progenitors.
2011,
Pubmed
Cameron,
RNA secondary structure regulates the translation of sxy and competence development in Haemophilus influenzae.
2008,
Pubmed
Casey,
Bix4 is activated directly by VegT and mediates endoderm formation in Xenopus development.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Casey,
The T-box transcription factor Brachyury regulates expression of eFGF through binding to a non-palindromic response element.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Clements,
Distinct regulatory control of the Brachyury gene in axial and non-axial mesoderm suggests separation of mesoderm lineages early in mouse gastrulation.
1996,
Pubmed
Conlon,
Inhibition of Xbra transcription activation causes defects in mesodermal patterning and reveals autoregulation of Xbra in dorsal mesoderm.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Conlon,
Determinants of T box protein specificity.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Crooks,
WebLogo: a sequence logo generator.
2004,
Pubmed
Crossley,
The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo.
1995,
Pubmed
Cunliffe,
Ectopic mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos caused by widespread expression of a Brachyury homologue.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Down,
NestedMICA: sensitive inference of over-represented motifs in nucleic acid sequence.
2005,
Pubmed
Draper,
Zebrafish fgf24 functions with fgf8 to promote posterior mesodermal development.
2003,
Pubmed
Elms,
Overlapping and distinct expression domains of Zic2 and Zic3 during mouse gastrulation.
2004,
Pubmed
Essner,
Expression of zebrafish connexin43.4 in the notochord and tail bud of wild-type and mutant no tail embryos.
1996,
Pubmed
Evans,
Vascular development in embryoid bodies: quantification of transgenic intervention and antiangiogenic treatment.
2007,
Pubmed
Faisst,
Rotatin is a novel gene required for axial rotation and left-right specification in mouse embryos.
2002,
Pubmed
Farnham,
Insights from genomic profiling of transcription factors.
2009,
Pubmed
Galceran,
Rescue of a Wnt mutation by an activated form of LEF-1: regulation of maintenance but not initiation of Brachyury expression.
2001,
Pubmed
Garnett,
Identification of direct T-box target genes in the developing zebrafish mesoderm.
2009,
Pubmed
Ginsburg,
Primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo during gastrulation.
1990,
Pubmed
Griffin,
Interplay between FGF, one-eyed pinhead, and T-box transcription factors during zebrafish posterior development.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Herrmann,
The T genes in embryogenesis.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Herrmann,
Cloning of the T gene required in mesoderm formation in the mouse.
1990,
Pubmed
Isaacs,
eFGF regulates Xbra expression during Xenopus gastrulation.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Istrail,
Logic functions of the genomic cis-regulatory code.
2005,
Pubmed
Jacobs-Cohen,
Abnormalities of cells and extracellular matrix of T/T embryos.
1983,
Pubmed
King,
The role of the brachyury gene in heart development and left-right specification in the mouse.
1998,
Pubmed
Kispert,
The Brachyury gene encodes a novel DNA binding protein.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kispert,
The T protein encoded by Brachyury is a tissue-specific transcription factor.
1995,
Pubmed
Kurisaki,
Spatially- and temporally-restricted expression of meltrin alpha (ADAM12) and beta (ADAM19) in mouse embryo.
1998,
Pubmed
Kusch,
Brachyury proteins regulate target genes through modular binding sites in a cooperative fashion.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lawson,
Clonal analysis of the origin of primordial germ cells in the mouse.
1994,
Pubmed
Lawson,
Bmp4 is required for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo.
1999,
Pubmed
Leung,
Activation of AXIN2 expression by beta-catenin-T cell factor. A feedback repressor pathway regulating Wnt signaling.
2002,
Pubmed
Lin,
ASAP1, a gene at 8q24, is associated with prostate cancer metastasis.
2008,
Pubmed
Martin,
GOToolBox: functional analysis of gene datasets based on Gene Ontology.
2004,
Pubmed
Martin,
Regulation of canonical Wnt signaling by Brachyury is essential for posterior mesoderm formation.
2008,
Pubmed
Morley,
A gene regulatory network directed by zebrafish No tail accounts for its roles in mesoderm formation.
2009,
Pubmed
Nagy,
Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells.
1993,
Pubmed
Naiche,
T-box genes in vertebrate development.
2005,
Pubmed
Nakaya,
Wnt3a links left-right determination with segmentation and anteroposterior axis elongation.
2005,
Pubmed
Nentwich,
Downstream of FGF during mesoderm formation in Xenopus: the roles of Elk-1 and Egr-1.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Niimi,
Single embryonic stem cell-derived embryoid bodies for gene screening.
2005,
Pubmed
O'Geen,
Comparison of sample preparation methods for ChIP-chip assays.
2006,
Pubmed
Ohinata,
A signaling principle for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice.
2009,
Pubmed
Passamaneck,
Direct activation of a notochord cis-regulatory module by Brachyury and FoxA in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis.
2009,
Pubmed
Pearce,
Mml, a mouse Mix-like gene expressed in the primitive streak.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Popsueva,
Overexpression of camello, a member of a novel protein family, reduces blastomere adhesion and inhibits gastrulation in Xenopus laevis.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Rana,
Targeted deletion of the novel cytoplasmic dynein mD2LIC disrupts the embryonic organiser, formation of the body axes and specification of ventral cell fates.
2004,
Pubmed
Rashbass,
Alterations in gene expression during mesoderm formation and axial patterning in Brachyury (T) embryos.
1994,
Pubmed
Russ,
Eomesodermin is required for mouse trophoblast development and mesoderm formation.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Saitou,
A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice.
2002,
Pubmed
Schmidt,
Five-vertebrate ChIP-seq reveals the evolutionary dynamics of transcription factor binding.
2010,
Pubmed
Schulte-Merker,
Mesoderm formation in response to Brachyury requires FGF signalling.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Schulte-Merker,
no tail (ntl) is the zebrafish homologue of the mouse T (Brachyury) gene.
1994,
Pubmed
Schulte-Merker,
The protein product of the zebrafish homologue of the mouse T gene is expressed in nuclei of the germ ring and the notochord of the early embryo.
1992,
Pubmed
Shur,
Cell surface glycosyltransferase activities during normal and mutant (T/T) mesenchyme migration.
1982,
Pubmed
Smith,
Expression of a Xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sousa-Nunes,
Characterizing embryonic gene expression patterns in the mouse using nonredundant sequence-based selection.
2003,
Pubmed
Suzuki,
Nanog binds to Smad1 and blocks bone morphogenetic protein-induced differentiation of embryonic stem cells.
2006,
Pubmed
Tada,
Bix1, a direct target of Xenopus T-box genes, causes formation of ventral mesoderm and endoderm.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tada,
Xwnt11 is a target of Xenopus Brachyury: regulation of gastrulation movements via Dishevelled, but not through the canonical Wnt pathway.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tamplin,
Microarray analysis of Foxa2 mutant mouse embryos reveals novel gene expression and inductive roles for the gastrula organizer and its derivatives.
2008,
Pubmed
Thomas-Chollier,
RSAT: regulatory sequence analysis tools.
2008,
Pubmed
Thomson,
Pluripotency factors in embryonic stem cells regulate differentiation into germ layers.
2011,
Pubmed
Tsang,
Experimental analysis of the emergence of left-right asymmetry of the body axis in early postimplantation mouse embryos.
1999,
Pubmed
Valamehr,
Hydrophobic surfaces for enhanced differentiation of embryonic stem cell-derived embryoid bodies.
2008,
Pubmed
Van Eynde,
The nuclear scaffold protein NIPP1 is essential for early embryonic development and cell proliferation.
2004,
Pubmed
Wartenberg,
The embryoid body as a novel in vitro assay system for antiangiogenic agents.
1998,
Pubmed
Weinstein,
The winged-helix transcription factor HNF-3 beta is required for notochord development in the mouse embryo.
1994,
Pubmed
White,
Embryonic stem cells form an organized, functional cardiac conduction system in vitro.
2005,
Pubmed
Wilkinson,
Expression pattern of the mouse T gene and its role in mesoderm formation.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Williams,
Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells.
1988,
Pubmed
Wilson,
Evolution of transcriptional control in mammals.
2009,
Pubmed
Wilson,
The T gene is necessary for normal mesodermal morphogenetic cell movements during gastrulation.
1995,
Pubmed
Wittler,
Expression of Msgn1 in the presomitic mesoderm is controlled by synergism of WNT signalling and Tbx6.
2007,
Pubmed
Yamaguchi,
T (Brachyury) is a direct target of Wnt3a during paraxial mesoderm specification.
1999,
Pubmed
Yanagisawa,
Effects of the brachyury (T) mutation on morphogenetic movement in the mouse embryo.
1981,
Pubmed
Zariwala,
Investigation of the possible role of a novel gene, DPCD, in primary ciliary dyskinesia.
2004,
Pubmed