Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
PLoS One
2012 Jan 01;79:e44190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044190.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Specificity determinants of the silkworm moth sex pheromone.
Xu P
,
Hooper AM
,
Pickett JA
,
Leal WS
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The insect olfactory system, particularly the peripheral sensory system for sex pheromone reception in male moths, is highly selective, but specificity determinants at the receptor level are hitherto unknown. Using the Xenopus oocyte recording system, we conducted a thorough structure-activity relationship study with the sex pheromone receptor of the silkworm moth, Bombyx mori, BmorOR1. When co-expressed with the obligatory odorant receptor co-receptor (BmorOrco), BmorOR1 responded in a dose-dependent fashion to both bombykol and its related aldehyde, bombykal, but the threshold of the latter was about one order of magnitude higher. Solubilizing these ligands with a pheromone-binding protein (BmorPBP1) did not enhance selectivity. By contrast, both ligands were trapped by BmorPBP1 leading to dramatically reduced responses. The silkworm moth pheromone receptor was highly selective towards the stereochemistry of the conjugated diene, with robust response to the natural (10E,12Z)-isomer and very little or no response to the other three isomers. Shifting the conjugated diene towards the functional group or elongating the carbon chain rendered these molecules completely inactive. In contrast, an analogue shortened by two omega carbons elicited the same or slightly higher responses than bombykol. Flexibility of the saturated C1-C9 moiety is important for function as addition of a double or triple bond in position 4 led to reduced responses. The ligand is hypothesized to be accommodated by a large hydrophobic cavity within the helical bundle of transmembrane domains.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
22957053
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC3434217 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Figure 2. Activation by bombykal.(A) Current responses and (B) dose-dependent relationships obtained by challenging BmorOR1â¢BmorOrco-expressing oocytes with increasing concentrations of bombykol and bombykal. nâ=â6.
Figure 3. Chemical analysis of synthetic pheromone components.GC-MS traces obtained from bombykol (upper trace) and bombykal (lower trace) samples freshly prepared to challenge BmorOR1â¢BmorOrco-expressing oocytes. Arrow indicates trace amounts of bombykal (1.3%) in the bombykol sample, whereas a dotted arrow shows traces of bombykol (0.9%) in bombykal sample. The ratio of bombykol (retention time, 16.06 min) to bombykal (15.42 min) in the two samples was 1.015±0.02, nâ=â3.
Figure 4. Synthetic pheromone components trapped by PBP.(A) Traces and (B) quantification of current responses obtained from the BmorOR1â¢BmorOrco-expressing oocytes when presented with bombykol and bombykal solubilized either by DMSO or BmorPBP1. nâ=â3. *Significantly different (t-test, P<0.05).
Figure 5. Chemical structures.Structures of the silkworm moth sex pheromone (1) and bombykol-related compounds, which were used to challenge BmorOR1â¢BmorOrco-expressing oocytes.
Figure 6. Stereochemical selectivity.(A) Traces and (B) quantification of current responses from BmorOR1â¢BmorOrco-expressing oocytes perfused with four isomers of bombykol at 0.1 µM. nâ=â5. Bars with the same letter arwe not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, P<0.01).
Figure 7. Effect of altering unsaturation on receptor response.(A) Traces and (B) quantification of current responses elicited by (8E,10Z)-hexadecadien-1-ol (9) and 10,12-hexadecadiyn-1-ol (6) presented at 1 mM. nâ=â3. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (One-way ANOVA, P<0.01).
Figure 8. Effect of number of carbons distal to unsaturation.(A) Current responses obtained by challenging BmorOR1â¢BmorOrco-expressing oocytes with bombykol (lower trace, positive control), (10E,12Z)-octadecadien-1-ol (7), and (10E,12Z)-tetradecadien-1-ol (8), robust response at 10 µM. (B) Dose-dependent relationships; nâ=â4.
Figure 9. Reducing responses by adding rigidity to the C1âC9 moiety.(A) Current responses elicited by (10E,12Z)-hexadecadien-4-yn-1-ol (10), (4Z,10E,12Z)-hexadecatrien-1-ol (11), and bombykol (1) from BmorOR1â¢BmorOrco-expressing oocytes (ligands presented at 10 µM). EC50s 1.7Ã10â5M, 1.3Ã10â5M, and 5.9Ã10â6M, respectively. (B) Dose-dependent relationships, nâ=â3â4.
Figure 10. Schemes AâC.Synthetic sequence for preparation of analogues 7â11 containing the (E,Z)-dienyl moiety.
Figure 11. Schemes DâG.Synthetic sequence for preparation of analogues 3â6 differing in unsaturation.
Figure 1. Bombykol receptor expressed in the Xenopus oocyte recording system.Robust currents from BmorOR1•BmorOrco-expressing oocytes when perfused with bombykol, and dose-dependent responses. n = 3–5, error bars in all figures represent SEM.
Forstner,
A receptor and binding protein interplay in the detection of a distinct pheromone component in the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus.
2009, Pubmed
Forstner,
A receptor and binding protein interplay in the detection of a distinct pheromone component in the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus.
2009,
Pubmed
Grosse-Wilde,
A pheromone-binding protein mediates the bombykol-induced activation of a pheromone receptor in vitro.
2006,
Pubmed
Grosse-Wilde,
Candidate pheromone receptors provide the basis for the response of distinct antennal neurons to pheromonal compounds.
2007,
Pubmed
Hooper,
High-throughput ESI-MS analysis of binding between the Bombyx mori pheromone-binding protein BmorPBP1, its pheromone components and some analogues.
2009,
Pubmed
Horst,
NMR structure reveals intramolecular regulation mechanism for pheromone binding and release.
2001,
Pubmed
Kaissling,
[Smell threshold of the silkworm].
1970,
Pubmed
Laughlin,
Activation of pheromone-sensitive neurons is mediated by conformational activation of pheromone-binding protein.
2008,
Pubmed
Leal,
Kinetics and molecular properties of pheromone binding and release.
2005,
Pubmed
Liman,
Subunit stoichiometry of a mammalian K+ channel determined by construction of multimeric cDNAs.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mitsuno,
Identification of receptors of main sex-pheromone components of three Lepidopteran species.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Miura,
Broadly and narrowly tuned odorant receptors are involved in female sex pheromone reception in Ostrinia moths.
2010,
Pubmed
Nakagawa,
Insect sex-pheromone signals mediated by specific combinations of olfactory receptors.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Syed,
Pheromone reception in fruit flies expressing a moth's odorant receptor.
2006,
Pubmed
Syed,
Bombykol receptors in the silkworm moth and the fruit fly.
2010,
Pubmed
Wang,
Functional characterization of pheromone receptors in the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens.
2011,
Pubmed
Wanner,
Sex pheromone receptor specificity in the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wojtasek,
Conformational change in the pheromone-binding protein from Bombyx mori induced by pH and by interaction with membranes.
1999,
Pubmed
Xu,
Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pheromone-sensitive neurons.
2005,
Pubmed
