Loveland AB et al. (2012), A general approach to break the concentration b...

XB-ART-45932

Nat Methods 2012 Oct 01;910:987-92. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2174.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

A general approach to break the concentration barrier in single-molecule imaging.

Loveland AB , Habuchi S , Walter JC , van Oijen AM .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Single-molecule fluorescence imaging is often incompatible with physiological protein concentrations, as fluorescence background overwhelms an individual molecule's signal. We solve this problem with a new imaging approach called PhADE (PhotoActivation, Diffusion and Excitation). A protein of interest is fused to a photoactivatable protein (mKikGR) and introduced to its surface-immobilized substrate. After photoactivation of mKikGR near the surface, rapid diffusion of the unbound mKikGR fusion out of the detection volume eliminates background fluorescence, whereupon the bound molecules are imaged. We labeled the eukaryotic DNA replication protein flap endonuclease 1 with mKikGR and added it to replication-competent Xenopus laevis egg extracts. PhADE imaging of high concentrations of the fusion construct revealed its dynamics and micrometer-scale movements on individual, replicating DNA molecules. Because PhADE imaging is in principle compatible with any photoactivatable fluorophore, it should have broad applicability in revealing single-molecule dynamics and stoichiometry of macromolecular protein complexes at previously inaccessible fluorophore concentrations.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 22961247
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC3610324
???displayArticle.link??? Nat Methods
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

	Figure 2. PhADE imaging of Fen1KikR visualizes the growth of individual replication bubbles(a) Scheme for replication of surface-immobilized Î» DNA by Xenopus egg extracts and detection of replication bubbles. Î» DNA is attached to the bottom surface of a flow cell at both ends. Next, the DNA is licensed with HSS. Replication is promoted with NPE supplemented with dig-dUTP and, for PhADE imaging, Fen1KikGR. After real-time imaging of Fen1KikR (see below), the extracts are removed, and replicated DNA is stained with Î±-Dig and/or SYTOX Orange. Scale bar: 1 Î¼m. (b) PhADE sequence used to visualize the growth of D179A Fen1KikR-labeled replication bubbles. (c) Replication was carried out in the presence of 4 Î¼M D179A Fen1KikGR and Dig-dUTP under conditions of limited origin firing (Supplementary Fig. 4aâb). Between 5 and 25 minutes after the first NPE addition, D179A Fen1KikR was imaged every 10 s using PhADE. A sample kymograph shows every third frame of a replication bubble growing over time. After the last PhADE cycle, replicated DNA was stained with Î±-Dig. (d) Histogram of bubble growth rates tracked between 5 and 25 minutes displays a mean of 520 Â± 220 bp minâ1 (Â± s.d.), (n = 62 events from 3 independent experiments). (e) Average length of replication bubbles as measured by Î±-Dig staining, in the presence (blue triangles) or absence (black squares) of 2 Î¼M D179A Fen1KikGR. Mean Â± error estimate (see Online Methods). See also Supplementary Table 1.
	Figure 3. During unperturbed replication, PhADE imaging of Fen1KikR reveals a high density of initiations(a) Replication of Î» DNA during unrestricted origin firing was monitored by PhADE imaging (as in Fig. 2b) of 2 Î¼M D179A Fen1KikGR and displayed as a kymograph. White arrows indicate initiations. (b) PhADE kymographs as in Figure 3a were analyzed to determine the mean number of origins firing each minute (black) or cumulatively (orange) per Î» DNA (n = 12 Î» DNA). Similar results were obtained in a second extract (Supplementary Fig. 5c). (c) PhADE kymographs as in Figure 3a were analyzed to determine the distance between adjacent initiations over time. Black bars, reliable resolution limit (> 0.5 Î¼m). Orange lines, single exponential decay fit to bars > 0.5 Î¼m. (d) The mean inter-origin distance as determined from 12 replicating Î» DNA molecules followed via D179A Fen1KikR PhADE declines over time. Mean Â± error estimate (see Online Methods). Similar results were obtained in a second extract (Supplementary Fig. 5d).
	Figure 4. PhADE reveals single molecules of Fen1KikGR at replication forks and measures Fen1KikGR off rate from DNA(a) Imaging sequence for Figure 4bâc. (b) Replication in the presence of 0.25 Î¼M WT Fen1KikGR. (top) A representative kymograph of Fen1KikR on Î» DNA imaged every 10 s. After the final round of PhADE, replication bubbles and DNA were detected. 132 Fen1KikR foci were localized to 113 replication bubbles. Scale bar: 1 Î¼m. (bottom) Intensity histogram of Fen1KikR foci on bubbles (black) versus single molecules of biotin-mKikR (gray). (c) As in Figure 4b but using 0.125 Î¼M WT Fen1KikGR. 112 Fen1KikR foci were found on 129 replication bubbles. (d) DNA was replicated in the presence of 0.125 Î¼M wild-type Fen1KikGR and Fen1KikR was imaged as in Supplementary Figure 7a before (first frame) and after photoactivation (frames 2â6). Afterwards, replication bubbles and DNA were detected. Scale bar: 1 Î¼m. (e) The duration of wild-type Fen1KikR binding at replication bubbles is compared to the fluorescence on times of immobilized Biotin-mKikR. (wild-type Fen1KikR: mean Â± s.d. of 3 experiments, n = 40 events; Biotin-mKikGR: mean Â± s.d. of 6 experiments, n = 1,165 events, points are fit to a mono-exponential decay). (f) DNA was replicated in the presence of 2 Î¼M WT Fen1KikGR. Fen1KikR was photoactivated once (black triangle) and imaged once a minute as depicted in Supplementary Figure 7c. Scale bar: 1 Î¼m. (g) Normalized, integrated intensity of the region in Figure 4f (squares) is compared to Biotin-mKikR photobleaching (solid line) under the same imaging conditions. Biexponential fit (dashed line) reveals a mean life-time of 0.7 Â± 0.3 min for Fen1KikGR on DNA.

References [+] :

Ayyagari, Okazaki fragment maturation in yeast. I. Distribution of functions between FEN1 AND DNA2. 2003, Pubmed