Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Nucleic Acids Res
2013 Feb 01;413:1544-54. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1269.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Selective association between nucleosomes with identical DNA sequences.
Nishikawa J
,
Ohyama T
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Self-assembly is the autonomous organization of constituents into higher order structures or assemblages and is a fundamental mechanism in biological systems. There has been an unfounded idea that self-assembly may be used in the sensing and pairing of homologous chromosomes or chromatin, including meiotic chromosome pairing, polytene chromosome formation in Diptera and transvection. Recent studies proved that double-stranded DNA molecules have a sequence-sensing property and can self-assemble, which may play a role in the above phenomena. However, to explain these processes in terms of self-assembly, it first must be proved that nucleosomes retain a DNA sequence-sensing property and can self-assemble. Here, using atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based analyses and a quantitative interaction assay, we show that nucleosomes with identical DNA sequences preferentially associate with each other in the presence of Mg(2+) ions. Using Xenopus borealis 5S rDNA nucleosome-positioning sequence and 601 and 603 sequences, homomeric or heteromeric octa- or tetranucleosomes were reconstituted in vitro and induced to form weak intracondensates by MgCl(2). AFM clearly showed that DNA sequence-based selective association occurs between nucleosomes with identical DNA sequences. Selective association was also detected between mononucleosomes. We propose that nucleosome self-assembly and DNA self-assembly constitute the mechanism underlying sensing and pairing of homologous chromosomes or chromatin.
Figure 1. Magnesium ion-induced condensation of octanucleosomes reconstituted in vitro. (A) DNA templates used in the reconstitution and the resulting nucleosomal arrays (also see Supplementary Figure S1). (B) Types of intracondensates and representative AFM images. The types are indicated by the number of globules. A nucleosome and a condensate of nucleosomes are each counted as a single globule. Bars indicate 100 nm. (C) Population ratio of each type of condensate relative to the entire population of octanucleosomes at 0.25, 0.50 or 1.0 mM Mg2+. The population ratio of the 2g type is indicated with a yellow line. ‘NC’ indicates octanucleosomes with no condensation; n ≥ 205 for each array. (D) Four forms of condensate type 2g. Bars indicate 100 nm. (E) Population ratio of each form of 2g relative to the entire population of octanucleosomes at 0.25, 0.50 or 1.0 mM Mg2+. For the 4-4 form of the chimeric array, two data sets are shown. The lower set (dotted line) indicates the data points for the 4-4 form with purely separated nucleosome species, as judged from the number of bridge lines (linker DNA) between the globules: a single bridge line means that each globule is comprised of a single nucleosome species. The upper set (solid line) indicates the data points for all the 4-4 forms. 4-4 forms with unclear linker image are included in calculating the upper data set. Representative AFM images of form 4-4 of the chimeric array are also shown.
Figure 2. Discrimination of association between nucleosomes in chimeric tetranucleosomal arrays. (A) DNA templates and nucleosomal arrays (see also Supplementary Figure S1). (B) Types of intracondensates and representative AFM images. The types are indicated by the number of globules, as in Figure 1. Bars indicate 100 nm. (C) Population ratio of each type of condensate relative to the entire population of tetranucleosomes at the indicated concentrations of Mg2+. The population ratio of the 3g type is indicated with a yellow line. ‘NC’ indicates tetranucleosomes with no condensation. The population ratios are mean values of three independent determinations. Across the range of Mg2+ concentrations, the total count of tetranucleosomes ranged from 88 to 508 (usually ∼200). (D) Four forms of type 3g. Bars indicate 100 nm. (E and F) Population ratio of each form of condensate relative to the entire population of the 3g-type condensates at the indicated concentrations of Mg2+. The linker DNA lengths were 30 bp (E) and 62 bp (F). The light blue and brown dotted lines indicate 16.7 and 33.3%, respectively (see text). The condensates were generated three times as described above, using at least two independently reconstituted samples. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 3). For form I of the AABB array and form IV of the ABAB array, the P-values for comparison of the corresponding data for the tetra-601 array (upper) and tetra-603 array (lower) are indicated. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Representative AFM images of form I of the AABB array and form IV of the ABAB array are also shown.
Figure 3. DNA-sequence-based preferential association between nucleosomes. (A) An assay for quantifying association between nucleosomes. Magnetic beads carrying nucleosomes were mixed with Alexa 555-labeled nucleosomes in the presence or absence of Mg2+. The associated nucleosomes were fixed and quantified using fluorescence microscopy. Bars indicate 5 µm. (B) Microscopic images (left) and quantification (right) of the association of Alexa 555-labeled nucleosomes with magnetic beads carrying nucleosomes. The fluorescence intensity generated by the association of Alexa 555-labeled nucleosomes (test) was calibrated by using the intensity of the internal control (IC). For beads used for the IC, see ‘Materials and Methods’ section. They were distinguished from test samples by detecting fluorescence of Alexa 647. The inset in each panel shows the IC bead. Mg2+-induced increase in fluorescence intensity on the beads is shown as a function of Mg2+ concentration. The focus was adjusted on the plane involving the ‘equator line’ of each bead. Bars indicate 5 µm. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 7). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Figure 4. Topology of nucleosome self-assembly and its hypothetical figure in the pairing of homologous chromatin. (A) Possible topologies of associated nucleosomes in the form I and form IV condensates of tetranucleosomal arrays. For 3g, form I and form IV, see Figure 2. Only three nucleosomes in the form I and form IV condensates are extracted. DNAs with the same sequence have the same color. (B) A hypothetical schema depicting nucleosome–nucleosome and DNA–DNA associations in the pairing of homologous chromatin.
Asakura,
A kinetic study of in vitro polymerization of flagellin.
1968, Pubmed
Asakura,
A kinetic study of in vitro polymerization of flagellin.
1968,
Pubmed
Baldwin,
DNA double helices recognize mutual sequence homology in a protein free environment.
2008,
Pubmed
Bateman,
A genomewide survey argues that every zygotic gene product is dispensable for the initiation of somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila.
2008,
Pubmed
Blumenstiel,
Components of the RNAi machinery that mediate long-distance chromosomal associations are dispensable for meiotic and early somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila melanogaster.
2008,
Pubmed
Carroll,
Centromere formation: from epigenetics to self-assembly.
2006,
Pubmed
Cherstvy,
DNA-DNA sequence homology recognition: physical mechanisms and open questions.
2011,
Pubmed
Cook,
The transcriptional basis of chromosome pairing.
1997,
Pubmed
Danilowicz,
Single molecule detection of direct, homologous, DNA/DNA pairing.
2009,
Pubmed
Ding,
Meiosis-specific noncoding RNA mediates robust pairing of homologous chromosomes in meiosis.
2012,
Pubmed
Duncan,
Transvection effects in Drosophila.
2002,
Pubmed
Falaschi,
Similia similibus: pairing of homologous chromosomes driven by the physicochemical properties of DNA.
2008,
Pubmed
Fraenkel-Conrat,
RECONSTITUTION OF ACTIVE TOBACCO MOSAIC VIRUS FROM ITS INACTIVE PROTEIN AND NUCLEIC ACID COMPONENTS.
1955,
Pubmed
Fraser,
Structure of the alpha-keratin microfibril.
1976,
Pubmed
Gerton,
Homologous chromosome interactions in meiosis: diversity amidst conservation.
2005,
Pubmed
Gessner,
Structural basis for stabilization of Z-DNA by cobalt hexaammine and magnesium cations.
1985,
Pubmed
Grigoryev,
Evidence for heteromorphic chromatin fibers from analysis of nucleosome interactions.
2009,
Pubmed
Grimaud,
RNAi components are required for nuclear clustering of Polycomb group response elements.
2006,
Pubmed
Hayes,
Preferential and asymmetric interaction of linker histones with 5S DNA in the nucleosome.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ho,
G.T wobble base-pairing in Z-DNA at 1.0 A atomic resolution: the crystal structure of d(CGCGTG).
1985,
Pubmed
HORVATH,
Action of cardiac glycosides on the polymerization of actin.
1949,
Pubmed
Inoue,
Self-assembly of double-stranded DNA molecules at nanomolar concentrations.
2007,
Pubmed
Kepper,
Nucleosome geometry and internucleosomal interactions control the chromatin fiber conformation.
2008,
Pubmed
Kornyshev,
Sequence recognition in the pairing of DNA duplexes.
2001,
Pubmed
Kruithof,
Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals a highly compliant helical folding for the 30-nm chromatin fiber.
2009,
Pubmed
Kushner,
Self-assembly of biological structures.
1969,
Pubmed
Lowary,
New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning.
1998,
Pubmed
Luger,
Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.
1997,
Pubmed
McGavin,
Models of specifically paired like (homologous) nucleic acid structures.
1971,
Pubmed
McGavin,
Four strand recombination models.
1989,
Pubmed
McKee,
Homologous pairing and chromosome dynamics in meiosis and mitosis.
2004,
Pubmed
Miki-Noumura,
Polymerization of tubulin: the linear polymer and its side-by-side aggregates.
1972,
Pubmed
Mogilner,
Towards a quantitative understanding of mitotic spindle assembly and mechanics.
2010,
Pubmed
MUELLER,
Reconstitution of cell membrane structure in vitro and its transformation into an excitable system.
1962,
Pubmed
Ollinger,
Mammalian protein SCP1 forms synaptonemal complex-like structures in the absence of meiotic chromosomes.
2005,
Pubmed
Perham,
Self-assembly of biological macromolecules.
1975,
Pubmed
Rocco,
Sensing of DNA non-homology lowers the initiation of meiotic recombination in yeast.
1996,
Pubmed
Schalch,
X-ray structure of a tetranucleosome and its implications for the chromatin fibre.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Suda,
Formation of a parallel-stranded DNA homoduplex by d(GGA) repeat oligonucleotides.
1995,
Pubmed
Sun,
Electrostatic mechanism of nucleosomal array folding revealed by computer simulation.
2005,
Pubmed
Tang,
Chromatin Organization by Repetitive Elements (CORE): A Genomic Principle for the Higher-Order Structure of Chromosomes.
2011,
Pubmed
Thåström,
Measurement of histone-DNA interaction free energy in nucleosomes.
2004,
Pubmed
Traub,
Structure and function of Escherichia coli ribosomes. VI. Mechanism of assembly of 30 s ribosomes studied in vitro.
1969,
Pubmed
Tsai,
Homologous pairing and the role of pairing centers in meiosis.
2011,
Pubmed
WATSON,
Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid.
1953,
Pubmed
Weiner,
Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast.
1994,
Pubmed
Whitesides,
Self-assembly at all scales.
2002,
Pubmed
Wilson,
Nick-free formation of reciprocal heteroduplexes: a simple solution to the topological problem.
1979,
Pubmed
Wu,
Transvection and other homology effects.
1999,
Pubmed
Wu,
A variable topology for the 30-nm chromatin fibre.
2007,
Pubmed