Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Xenopus myotome is formed by a first medial and lateral myogenesis directly arising from the presomitic mesoderm followed by a second myogenic wave emanating from the dermomyotome. Here, by a series of gain and loss of function experiments, we showed that Mef2d, a member of the Mef2 family of MADS-box transcription factors, appeared as an upstream regulator of lateral myogenesis, and as an inducer of dermomyotome formation at the beginning of neurulation. In the lateral presomitic cells, we showed that Mef2d transactivates Myod expression which is necessary for lateral myogenesis. In the most lateral cells of the presomitic mesoderm, we showed that Mef2d and Paraxis (Tcf15), a member of the Twist family of transcription factors, were co-localized and activate directly the expression of Meox2, which acts upstream of Pax3 expression during dermomyotome formation. Cell tracing experiments confirm that the most lateralMeox2 expressing cells of the presomitic mesoderm correspond to the dermomyotome progenitors since they give rise to the most dorsal cells of the somitic mesoderm. Thus, Xenopus Mef2d couples lateral myogenesis to dermomyotome formation before somite segmentation. These results together with our previous works reveal striking similarities between dermomyotome and tendon formation in Xenopus: both develop in association with myogenic cells and both involve a gene transactivation pathway where one member of the Mef2 family, Mef2d or Mef2c, cooperates with a bHLH protein of the Twist family, Paraxis or Scx (Scleraxis) respectively. We propose that these shared characteristics in Xenopus laevis reflect the existence of a vertebrate ancestral mechanism which has coupled the development of the myogenic cells to the formation of associated tissues during somite compartmentalization.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
23300648
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC3534117 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One
Figure 2. Mef2d drives lateralMyod expression.(A) In situ hybridization of Myod and Mef2d at gastrula and neurula stages realized from time-course experiment with embryos of the same fecondation pool. Brackets show initial posteriorMyod expression. (B) Single and double in situ hybridization with Mef2d (blue) and Myod (purple) show that Mef2d precedes Myod expression in the posterolateral domain of presomitic mesoderm (arrows) at stage 12.5/13. (C) Embryos injected unilaterally with 400 pg of Mef2dF mRNA. (D) Western blot with anti-flag and anti-tubulin antibodies of late gastrula embryos injected bilaterally either with 300 pg of 5utrMef2dF synthetic mRNA alone (lane1) or with oligomorpholinos: moControl (lane 2), moMef2d1 (lane3), or moMef2d2 (lane 4). (E) Embryos injected unilaterally with 20 ng of moMef2d1 and submitted to in situ hybridization to detect either Myod or Desmin mRNA. (F) Co-injection of Mef2dF mRNA (200 pg) with moMef2d1 was able to rescue the phenotype of moMef2d1 embryos. (G) Unilateral injection of MyodF mRNA (300 pg) or moMyod1 and detection of Actc and Mef2d expression at stage 16. β-galactosidase mRNA (blue) was co-injected to identify the injected side, indicated by an asterisk (*). Vertical lines define the limit between anterior and trunk regions. Probes are in a framed box and indicated for each panel. Dorsal views. the anterior side of the embryos is on the left; st., stage. For complete statistical data, see supporting information, figure S2.
Figure 3. Mef2d is necessary for the activating effect of Fgf on Myod expression at the neurula stage.(A) Embryos were injected unilaterally either with Fgf8b synthetic mRNA alone (5 pg), or with moMyod1 or with moMef2d1, fixed at the gastrula stage and submitted to in situ hybridization for Xbra, Myod or Mef2d. Co-injection of Mef2dF mRNA with moMef2d1 was able to rescue the phenotype of moMef2d1 embryos (+Mef2dF). (B) Unilateral injection of Fgf8b mRNA induced the lateral expansion of Mef2d expression domain at stage 16. (C) Embryos were injected unilaterally with 20 ng of XIMOF8 and fixed at stage 16. Co-injection with Mef2dF mRNA was able to rescue the phenotype of XIMOF8 embryos (+Mef2dF). (D) Embryos were injected at stage 11.5/12 with DMSO or 5 mM SU5402, an inhibitor of Fgf signaling, and fixed at stage 16. A first unilateral injection of Mef2dF mRNA at the two-cell stage was able to rescue the phenotype of treated embryos (+Mef2dF). Injected side (*) at the bottom except in (A), on the left. Bracket indicates the position of lateral myogenic cells. Probes are in a framed box and indicated for each panel. For complete statistical data, see supporting information, figure S2.
Figure 4. Mef2d is required for dermomyotome formation.(A) Embryos injected unilaterally with 400 pg of Mef2dF mRNA or 20 ng of moMef2d1 were fixed at stage 26 and submitted to staining with the specific muscle 12/101 antibody (red). (B) Expression of Pax7 and Pax3 mRNA at stage 17/18 (dorsal view or transverse sections at the trunk level). Co-staining of Pax3 mRNA (purple) and differentiated muscle cells detected by 12/101 antibody (blue). Dotted lines indicate the position of the medial and lateral population of myogenic cells [5]. (C) Expression of Pax3 mRNA on a transverse section at stage 22. (D) Pax3 mRNA expression on lateral view (left) or on transverse section (right) at the tailbud stage after unilateral injection of Mef2dF or moMef2d1. Rescue experiments restored the phenotype of moMef2d1. Arrows indicate the sites of lateral ectopic expression of Pax3. (*) Injected side. Probes are in a framed box and indicated for each panel. Nc, notochord. For complete statistical data, see supporting information, figure S2.
Figure 5. Paraxis and Mef2d have a cooperative effect on dermomyotome formation.(A) Expression of Paraxis mRNA during neurulation. Costaining of Mef2d (blue) and Paraxis (purple) mRNA at stage 13 in comparison with Mef2d expression alone. Rounded brackets indicate the region of colocalization of Paraxis and Mef2d. Dorsal views. The anterior side of the embryos is on the left; st., stage. Vertical lines define the limit between anterior and trunk region. (B) Transverse sections of the costained embryos compared to Mef2d staining at stage 13 (upper panels). Expression of Paraxis and Mef2d at stage 17/18 (lower panels). Dotted lines indicate the position of the medial and lateral population of myogenic cells. (C) Expression of Paraxis mRNA on a transverse section at stage 23. (D) Western blot with anti-flag and anti-tubulin antibodies of late gastrula embryos injected bilaterally either with 300 pg of 5utrParaxis synthetic mRNA alone (lane1) or with oligomorpholinos: moControl (lane 2) or moParaxis1 (lane3). (E) Embryos injected unilaterally with 20 ng of moParaxis1 were submitted to in situ hybridization with Pax3 antisense probe at the tailbud stage (lateral view or transverse section). A co-injection of ParaxisFâ mRNA (150 pg) with moParaxis1 was able to rescue the phenotype of moParaxis1 injected embryos (lateral view). (F) Unilateral injection of ParaxisGRF (150 pg) induced an increase of Pax3 mRNA expression at the tailbud stage. Pax3 expression after co-injection of ParaxisF+Mef2dF or ParaxisGRF+Mef2dF. ParaxisGRF injection with moMef2d1 had no effect on Pax3 expression. (*) Injected side. Probes are in a framed box and indicated for each panel. Nc, notochord. For complete statistical data, see supporting information, figure S2.
Figure 6. Lateral presomitic cells expressing Meox2 are the dermomytome progenitors.(A) Expression of Meox2 mRNA in the most lateral region (rounded brackets) of presomitic mesoderm at stage 14 (dorsal view and transverse section), 16 (dorsal view), 17/18 (dorsal view and transverse section) and 23 (transverse section). Dotted lines indicate the position of the medial and lateral population of myogenic cells. Vertical lines define the limit between anterior and trunk region. Nc, notochord. (B) Lineage tracing experiments: embryos were injected with WGA-rhodamine (red) in the most lateralpresomitic mesoderm (a) or co-injected with WGA-fluorescein (green) in the lateralpresomitic mesoderm (c) at stage 13. Transverse sections of the embryo at the trunk level and at stages 18 or 23; embryo injected with WGA-rhodamine and submitted to indirect immunofluorescence with 12/101 antibody followed by secondary Alexa fluor 488 anti-mouse antibody (green) (b) or injected with the both tracers (d, e and f). WGA-rhodamine fluorescence (d), WGA-fluorescein fluorescence (e), merge (f). Dotted lines indicate the bilateral symmetry plan. In (a) and (c): Vertical lines define the limit between anterior and trunk region. (a) and (c) dorsal views, anterior side on the left. (C, D and E). Ablation experiments of presomitic mesoderm at stage 14. After microdissection experiments, embryos were fixed at stage 19 or at the tailbud stage to analyze meox2 and pax3 expression respectively. (C) sham-operated embryos, ectoderm was incised at the lateral level (line), ectoderm and mesoderm were separated from each other on the lateral side, but mesoderm was not removed. (D) Same operation on the mediolateral level but superficial mesoderm was removed (hatched zone) (E) Same operation on the lateral level but superficial mesoderm was removed (hatched zone). Brackets show the axis level corresponding to incision. For complete statistical data, see supporting information, figure S2.
Figure 7. Paraxis and Mef2d targets Meox2 gene in the most lateral part of the presomitic mesoderm.(A) Embryos injected unilaterally with 20 ng of moParaxis1 or moMef2d1 were submitted to in situ hybridization with Meox2 antisense probe at the neurula stage. Injection of either ParaxisFâ mRNA with moParaxis1 or Mef2dF with moMef2d1 was able to rescue the phenotype. (B) Unilateral injection of either ParaxisGRF or Mef2dGRF induced an increase of Meox2 mRNA expression at the neurula stage after induction by dexamethasone (DXM) at stage 12.5. A cooperative effect was observed after co-injection of ParaxisGRF and Mef2dF. A treatment by cycloheximid (CHX) followed by induction by dexamethasone (DXM) at stage 12.5 indicated that Meox2 is a direct target gene of Paraxis and Mef2d. (*) Injected side. Probes are in a framed box and indicated for each panel. (C) COS7 cells were transfected with pmeox2-luc alone, or co-transfected with either Paraxis, Mef2d-V5/His or both and luciferase activity was determined 48 h after transfection. * P<0.01 (D) Protein extracts from COS7 cells transfected with Mef2d-V5/His alone or with either empty vector (Gal4) or Gal4-Paraxis construct were immunoprecipitated (IP) with Ni-NTA beads and subjected to Western blot (WB) using an anti-Gal4 antibody (upper panel). Input control experiments with anti-V5 (lower panel) or anti-Gal4 (mid panel) antibodies. For complete statistical data, see supporting information, figure S2.
Figure 8. Meox2 acts downstream of Paraxis and Mef2d on dermomyotome formation.(A). Western blot with anti-flag and anti-tubulin antibodies of late gastrula embryos injected bilaterally either with 300 pg of 5utrMeox2F synthetic mRNA alone (lane1) or with oligomorpholinos: moControl (lane 2) or moMeox2-1 (lane3). (B) Embryos injected unilaterally with 20 ng of moMeox2-1 were submitted to in situ hybridization with Pax3 antisense probe at the tailbud stage (lateral view or transverse section). A co-injection of Meox2F mRNA with moMeox2-1 was able to rescue the phenotype of moMeox2-1 (lateral view). (C) Pax3 mRNA expression on lateral views and section of embryos at the tailbud stage after unilateral injection of Meox2F (200 pg). (D, E) Pax3 mRNA expression on lateral view of embryos at the tailbud stage after unilateral injection of moMef2d1(D) or moparaxis1 (E). Rescue experiments by Meox2F (100 pg) restored the phenotype of moMef2d1 (D) and moparaxis1 (E) morphants. Arrows indicate hypaxial expression of Pax3. (*) Injected side. Nc, notochord. For complete statistical data, see supporting information, figure S2.
Figure 9. Schematic representation of myotome and dermomyotome formation in Xenopus.(A) The most lateral Meox2 expressing cells of the paraxial mesoderm give rise to the dermomyotome (De) whereas the lateral myogenic cells give rise to a dorsomedial (DoMe) and a ventrolateral (VeLa) cell population. The medial myogenic cells differentiate first and remain associated with the notochord [5]. Arrows design the movement of lateral paraxial mesoderm. Dotted arrows design the movement of invagination of neurectodermal cells. NT, neural tube. Nc, notochord. (B) Mef2d couples lateral myogenesis to dermomyotome formation: In lateral presomitic cells, Mef2d transactivates the Myod gene and in the most lateral presomitic cells Mef2d and Paraxis transactivates the Meox2 gene.
Figure 1. Myod is required for lateral myogenesis.(A) Western blot with anti-flag and anti-tubulin antibodies of gastrula embryos injected bilaterally at the two-cell stage with 300 pg of 5utrMyf5F, 5utrMyodF or 70 pg of 5utrMrf4F synthetic mRNAs alone or with oligomorpholinos. Arrows point out the specific signal. Lane 1: synthetic mRNA alone, 2: synthetic mRNA+moControl, 3: synthetic mRNA+specific mo (moMyf5, moMyod1 or moMrf4-1 with 5utrMyf5F, 5utrMyodF or 5utrMrf4F respectively). (B) Whole-mount in situ hybridization of embryos unilaterally injected with 20 ng of moMyf5, moMyod1 or moMrf4-1 and fixed at stages 14 or 18/19. β-galactosidase mRNA (blue) was co-injected to identify the injected side, indicated by an asterisk (*). Dorsal views. The anterior side of the embryos is on the left; st., stage. (C) Transverse sections of the morphants at stage 26. (D) Transverse section of the Myod morphant submitted to whole-mount immunohistochemistry with the 12/101 antibody. (E) Rescue experiments: Embryos were injected unilaterally with 20 ng of moMyod1 alone or co-injected with synthetic mRNA coding for MyodF (150 pg) and probed with MyhE3. Nc, notochord. Probes are in a framed box and indicated for each panel. For complete statistical data, see supporting information, figure S2.
Andrés,
Regulation of Gax homeobox gene transcription by a combination of positive factors including myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2.
1995, Pubmed
Andrés,
Regulation of Gax homeobox gene transcription by a combination of positive factors including myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2.
1995,
Pubmed
Barnes,
A twist of insight - the role of Twist-family bHLH factors in development.
2009,
Pubmed
Becker,
Expression of MRF4 protein in adult and in regenerating muscles in Xenopus.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Berkes,
MyoD and the transcriptional control of myogenesis.
2005,
Pubmed
Blais,
An initial blueprint for myogenic differentiation.
2005,
Pubmed
Buckingham,
Distinct and dynamic myogenic populations in the vertebrate embryo.
2009,
Pubmed
Candia,
The expression pattern of Xenopus Mox-2 implies a role in initial mesodermal differentiation.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Carpio,
Xenopus paraxis homologue shows novel domains of expression.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Charbonnier,
Two myogenin-related genes are differentially expressed in Xenopus laevis myogenesis and differ in their ability to transactivate muscle structural genes.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chen,
Control of muscle regeneration in the Xenopus tadpole tail by Pax7.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Colas,
Mix.1/2-dependent control of FGF availability during gastrulation is essential for pronephros development in Xenopus.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Daughters,
Origin of muscle satellite cells in the Xenopus embryo.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Davidson,
Neural tube closure in Xenopus laevis involves medial migration, directed protrusive activity, cell intercalation and convergent extension.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
della Gaspera,
The Xenopus MEF2 gene family: evidence of a role for XMEF2C in larval tendon development.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Della Gaspera,
Spatio-temporal expression of MRF4 transcripts and protein during Xenopus laevis embryogenesis.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Della Gaspera,
Myogenic waves and myogenic programs during Xenopus embryonic myogenesis.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Delling,
A calcineurin-NFATc3-dependent pathway regulates skeletal muscle differentiation and slow myosin heavy-chain expression.
2000,
Pubmed
Devoto,
Identification of separate slow and fast muscle precursor cells in vivo, prior to somite formation.
1996,
Pubmed
Dorey,
FGF signalling: diverse roles during early vertebrate embryogenesis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Edmondson,
Mef2 gene expression marks the cardiac and skeletal muscle lineages during mouse embryogenesis.
1994,
Pubmed
Fisher,
eFGF is required for activation of XmyoD expression in the myogenic cell lineage of Xenopus laevis.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fletcher,
FGF8 spliceforms mediate early mesoderm and posterior neural tissue formation in Xenopus.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Frank,
Transient expression of XMyoD in non-somitic mesoderm of Xenopus gastrulae.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Freitas,
Evidence that mechanisms of fin development evolved in the midline of early vertebrates.
2006,
Pubmed
Geiser,
Integration of PCR fragments at any specific site within cloning vectors without the use of restriction enzymes and DNA ligase.
2001,
Pubmed
Gensch,
Different autonomous myogenic cell populations revealed by ablation of Myf5-expressing cells during mouse embryogenesis.
2008,
Pubmed
Grimaldi,
Hedgehog regulation of superficial slow muscle fibres in Xenopus and the evolution of tetrapod trunk myogenesis.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gros,
A common somitic origin for embryonic muscle progenitors and satellite cells.
2005,
Pubmed
Groves,
Fgf8 drives myogenic progression of a novel lateral fast muscle fibre population in zebrafish.
2005,
Pubmed
Haldar,
Two cell lineages, myf5 and myf5-independent, participate in mouse skeletal myogenesis.
2008,
Pubmed
Harvey,
The Xenopus MyoD gene: an unlocalised maternal mRNA predates lineage-restricted expression in the early embryo.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hinits,
Differential requirements for myogenic regulatory factors distinguish medial and lateral somitic, cranial and fin muscle fibre populations.
2009,
Pubmed
Hinits,
Mef2s are required for thick filament formation in nascent muscle fibres.
2007,
Pubmed
Hollway,
Whole-somite rotation generates muscle progenitor cell compartments in the developing zebrafish embryo.
2007,
Pubmed
Hopwood,
Xenopus Myf-5 marks early muscle cells and can activate muscle genes ectopically in early embryos.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hopwood,
MyoD expression in the forming somites is an early response to mesoderm induction in Xenopus embryos.
1989,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Isaacs,
eFGF regulates Xbra expression during Xenopus gastrulation.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Jennings,
Expression of the myogenic gene MRF4 during Xenopus development.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kassar-Duchossoy,
Mrf4 determines skeletal muscle identity in Myf5:Myod double-mutant mice.
2004,
Pubmed
Keren,
p38 MAP kinase regulates the expression of XMyf5 and affects distinct myogenic programs during Xenopus development.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Khokha,
Depletion of three BMP antagonists from Spemann's organizer leads to a catastrophic loss of dorsal structures.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kim,
The protocadherin PAPC establishes segmental boundaries during somitogenesis in xenopus embryos.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kroll,
Transgenic Xenopus embryos from sperm nuclear transplantations reveal FGF signaling requirements during gastrulation.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kusakabe,
Evolutionary perspectives from development of mesodermal components in the lamprey.
2007,
Pubmed
Leibham,
Binding of TFIID and MEF2 to the TATA element activates transcription of the Xenopus MyoDa promoter.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Leise,
Inhibition of the cell cycle is required for convergent extension of the paraxial mesoderm during Xenopus neurulation.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lin,
Control of mouse cardiac morphogenesis and myogenesis by transcription factor MEF2C.
1997,
Pubmed
Lin,
Requirement of the MADS-box transcription factor MEF2C for vascular development.
1998,
Pubmed
Linker,
beta-Catenin-dependent Wnt signalling controls the epithelial organisation of somites through the activation of paraxis.
2005,
Pubmed
Mankoo,
The concerted action of Meox homeobox genes is required upstream of genetic pathways essential for the formation, patterning and differentiation of somites.
2003,
Pubmed
Mariani,
The neural plate specifies somite size in the Xenopus laevis gastrula.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Martin,
Hypaxial muscle migration during primary myogenesis in Xenopus laevis.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Meadows,
The myocardin-related transcription factor, MASTR, cooperates with MyoD to activate skeletal muscle gene expression.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mokalled,
MASTR directs MyoD-dependent satellite cell differentiation during skeletal muscle regeneration.
2012,
Pubmed
Monsoro-Burq,
Neural crest induction by paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos requires FGF signals.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Naya,
MEF2: a transcriptional target for signaling pathways controlling skeletal muscle growth and differentiation.
1999,
Pubmed
Nentwich,
Downstream of FGF during mesoderm formation in Xenopus: the roles of Elk-1 and Egr-1.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Paris,
Identification of MEF2-regulated genes during muscle differentiation.
2004,
Pubmed
Penn,
A MyoD-generated feed-forward circuit temporally patterns gene expression during skeletal muscle differentiation.
2004,
Pubmed
Potthoff,
MEF2: a central regulator of diverse developmental programs.
2007,
Pubmed
Potthoff,
Histone deacetylase degradation and MEF2 activation promote the formation of slow-twitch myofibers.
2007,
Pubmed
Potthoff,
Regulation of skeletal muscle sarcomere integrity and postnatal muscle function by Mef2c.
2007,
Pubmed
Rampalli,
p38 MAPK signaling regulates recruitment of Ash2L-containing methyltransferase complexes to specific genes during differentiation.
2007,
Pubmed
Reijntjes,
A comparative analysis of Meox1 and Meox2 in the developing somites and limbs of the chick embryo.
2007,
Pubmed
Relaix,
A Pax3/Pax7-dependent population of skeletal muscle progenitor cells.
2005,
Pubmed
Rolo,
Morphogenetic movements driving neural tube closure in Xenopus require myosin IIB.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sambasivan,
Distinct regulatory cascades govern extraocular and pharyngeal arch muscle progenitor cell fates.
2009,
Pubmed
Sandmann,
A core transcriptional network for early mesoderm development in Drosophila melanogaster.
2007,
Pubmed
Sandmann,
A temporal map of transcription factor activity: mef2 directly regulates target genes at all stages of muscle development.
2006,
Pubmed
Scales,
Two distinct Xenopus genes with homology to MyoD1 are expressed before somite formation in early embryogenesis.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Steinbach,
Temporal restriction of MyoD induction and autocatalysis during Xenopus mesoderm formation.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tajbakhsh,
Skeletal muscle stem cells in developmental versus regenerative myogenesis.
2009,
Pubmed
Tapscott,
The circuitry of a master switch: Myod and the regulation of skeletal muscle gene transcription.
2005,
Pubmed
Wilson-Rawls,
Differential regulation of epaxial and hypaxial muscle development by paraxis.
1999,
Pubmed
Wong,
Activation of Xenopus MyoD transcription by members of the MEF2 protein family.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yusuf,
The eventful somite: patterning, fate determination and cell division in the somite.
2006,
Pubmed