Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
We used deletion mutants to study beta-catenin function in axon arborization of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in live Xenopus laevis tadpoles. A deletion mutant betacatDeltaARM consists of the N- and C-terminal domains of wild-type beta-catenin that contain, respectively, alpha-catenin and postsynaptic density-95 (PSD-95)/discs large (Dlg)/zona occludens-1 (ZO-1) (PDZ) binding sites but lacks the central armadillo repeat region that binds cadherins and other proteins. Expression of DeltaARM in RGCs of live tadpoles perturbed axon arborization in two distinct ways: some RGC axons did not form arbors, whereas the remaining RGC axons formed arbors with abnormally long and tangled branches. Expression of the N- and C-terminal domains of beta-catenin separately in RGCs resulted in segregation of these two phenotypes. The axons of RGCs overexpressing the N-terminal domain of beta-catenin developed no or very few branches, whereas axons of RGCs overexpressing the C-terminal domain of beta-catenin formed arbors with long, tangled branches. Additional analysis revealed that the axons of RGCs that did not form arbors after overexpression of DeltaARM or the N-terminal domain of beta-catenin were frequently mistargeted within the tectum. These results suggest that interactions of the N-terminal domain of beta-catenin with alpha-catenin and of the C-terminal domain with PDZ domain-containing proteins are required, respectively, to initiate and shape axon arbors of RGCs in vivo.
Figure 1.
β-catenin is expressed in RGCaxon arbors in the tectum. Confocal image (single optic section) of a tectal section taken from a stage 45/46 tadpole stained with anti β-catenin antibody (red) shows expression in the neuropil area, the target region for RGC axons (A). Confocal image of a GFP-expressing RGCaxon arbor (green) in the same optic section shows that the axon arbor is in the neuropil region of the tectal section (B). Higher magnification zoom of boxed regions in A and B shows that β-catenin staining is punctate in the neuropil (C) and that the GFP-expressing RGCaxon arbor contains β-catenin puncta (E, arrows, double arrow, arrowhead). β-catenin puncta are located at branch points (D, arrows), in growth cones (D, double arrow), and along branch shafts (D, arrowhead). np, Neuropil region of the tectum; cb, cell body region of the tectum. Scale bars: A, B,10 μm; C-E, 5 μm.
Figure 2.
Schematic diagram of mutant β-catenin constructs. Wild-type β-catenin consists of three distinct functional and structural domains: an N-terminal domain, a central core consisting of 12 armadillo repeats, and a C-terminal domain. Within these three domains, β-catenin contains binding sites for α-catenin (N-terminal domain and armadillo repeats R1-R2; amino acid residues 120-150), cadherins (binding spans throughout armadillo repeats R3-R12), and PDZ-domain-containing proteins (C-terminal domain; amino acid residues 777-781). The deletion mutant ÎARM lacks almost the entire armadillo repeat region found in wild-type β-catenin; it consists of the N-terminal residues 1-151 of wild-type β-catenin fused to the C-terminal residues 648-781. Thus, ÎARM retains binding to α-catenin and PDZ-binding proteins but not to cadherin. The deletion mutants NTERM and CTERM are simply the N- and C-terminal domains of β-catenin that together constitute ÎARM. Each protein had GFP fused to its N terminus and was expressed using the Xenopus expression vector pCS2. ÎARM and CTERM also contained a myc-epitope tag at their C termini. We also confirmed the effects of ÎARM without an attached GFP tag and of CTERM without attached GFP or myc tags (see Results).
Figure 3.
Axonal arborization phenotypes of RGCs expressing β-catenin deletion mutants. Projected confocal z-series images taken of axon arbors in live tadpoles show arbor morphologies for RGCs expressing GFP (A) or GFP-tagged-β-catenin deletion mutants (B-E). RGC axons that express the β-catenin deletion mutant ÎARM have two distinct phenotypes. They either do not arborize (B) or they arborize but contain longer, tangled branches (C). RGC axons expressing the β-catenin deletion mutant NTERM form severely reduced arbors (D) that are similar to the subpopulation of ÎARM arbors with no or few branches (B). RGC axons expressing CTERM form arbors with long, tangled branches (E) that are similar to the subpopulation of ÎARM arbors with effusive branching (C). RGC axons that express ÎARM and NTERM and form severely reduced arbors (B, D) also have bulbous endings at their axon/branch tips (B, D, arrows) and appear thicker than RGC arbors that express GFP, ÎARM, and CTERM (compare axon/branch thicknesses in B, D with those in A, C, E). Note that at the level of magnification of these projected confocal z-series (40Ã), all of the GFP-tagged-β-catenin deletion mutant constructs appear to be uniformly distributed within the axon terminals and arbors. Scale bars: A-E, 20 μm.
Figure 4.
Tracings of projected confocal z-series of RGC axon arbors expressing β-catenin deletion mutants confirm morphological phenotypes. Compared with controls, RGC axons that express ÎARM have two distinct phenotypes. They either do not arborize (B) or they arborize but have abnormally long and tangled branches (C). NTERM-expressing arbors (D) are similar to the subpopulation of ÎARM arbors with no or few branches (B). CTERM-expressing arbors (E) are similar to the subpopulation of ÎARM arbors with abnormally long, tangled branches (C). For each condition (A-E), two examples of arbors are shown. In each example of an arbor, two (or three) (B, left) tracings are shown that correspond to confocal images taken â¼ 24 hr apart. The first tracing of each example corresponds to a confocal image taken at stage 45/46. The left most arbor tracing in A-E corresponds, respectively, to the actual confocal z-series projection image shown in Figure 3A-E. Stippling over a single arbor branch in C and E illustrates a particularly tangled branch. Rostral is to the top and lateral is to the right in all images. Scale bars, 20 μm (A-E).
Figure 5.
Quantification of morphological parameters for arbors from RGCs expressing β-catenin deletion mutants confirm phenotypes shown in Figures 3 and 4. The distribution of branch numbers in arbors at stage 45 shows that GFP axon arbors are distributed about a mean of â¼11 branches (A). In contrast, ÎARM axons are distributed about two distinct means: ÎARM arbors either have very few (1-2) branches or they have approximately the same number of branches as control GFP arbors (A). In addition, NTERM arbors have no or very few (1-6) branches, whereas CTERM arbors have numbers of branches comparable with GFP arbors (A). Plot of mean numbers of branches in arbors over 2 d shows that GFP arbors acquire more branches over time (B). ÎARM arbors with branches and CTERM arbors behave similarly to GFP arbors (B). In contrast, ÎARM axons without arbors and NTERM axons form few or no additional branches over time (B). Branched ÎARM arbors (with 9 or more branches) and CTERM arbors also grow faster than GFP arbors (C) (p < 0.05 for both, Student's t test). We did not measure the growth rate for unbranched ÎARM and NTERM arbors because many RGCs in these two classes did not form arbors (C). The number of axons analyzed is as follows: A, GFP (21), ÎARM (24), NTERM (7), CTERM (10); B, GFP (10), ÎARM-branched (6), ÎARM-unbranched (6), NTERM (7), CTERM (10), (C) GFP (9), ÎARM-branched (6), CTERM (10).
Alsina,
Visualizing synapse formation in arborizing optic axons in vivo: dynamics and modulation by BDNF.
2001, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Alsina,
Visualizing synapse formation in arborizing optic axons in vivo: dynamics and modulation by BDNF.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Benson,
N-cadherin redistribution during synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons.
1998,
Pubmed
Cantallops,
Postsynaptic CPG15 promotes synaptic maturation and presynaptic axon arbor elaboration in vivo.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Cohen-Cory,
Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on optic axon branching and remodelling in vivo.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fujita,
Hakai, a c-Cbl-like protein, ubiquitinates and induces endocytosis of the E-cadherin complex.
2002,
Pubmed
Funayama,
Embryonic axis induction by the armadillo repeat domain of beta-catenin: evidence for intracellular signaling.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gottardi,
Adhesion signaling: how beta-catenin interacts with its partners.
2001,
Pubmed
Hall,
Axonal remodeling and synaptic differentiation in the cerebellum is regulated by WNT-7a signaling.
2000,
Pubmed
Hecht,
Functional characterization of multiple transactivating elements in beta-catenin, some of which interact with the TATA-binding protein in vitro.
1999,
Pubmed
Holt,
Lipofection of cDNAs in the embryonic vertebrate central nervous system.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Holt,
Does timing of axon outgrowth influence initial retinotectal topography in Xenopus?
1984,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hülsken,
E-cadherin and APC compete for the interaction with beta-catenin and the cytoskeleton.
1994,
Pubmed
Inoue,
Lamina-specific connectivity in the brain: regulation by N-cadherin, neurotrophins, and glycoconjugates.
1997,
Pubmed
Ivanov,
Structure and functions of classical cadherins.
2001,
Pubmed
Kypta,
Association between a transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase and the cadherin-catenin complex.
1996,
Pubmed
Lee,
N-cadherin regulates target specificity in the Drosophila visual system.
2001,
Pubmed
Lilien,
Turn-off, drop-out: functional state switching of cadherins.
2002,
Pubmed
Lin,
Distinct roles of nerve and muscle in postsynaptic differentiation of the neuromuscular synapse.
2001,
Pubmed
Loureiro,
Roles of Armadillo, a Drosophila catenin, during central nervous system development.
1998,
Pubmed
Loureiro,
Activated armadillo/beta-catenin does not play a general role in cell migration and process extension in Drosophila.
2001,
Pubmed
Miskevich,
Expression of multiple cadherins and catenins in the chick optic tectum.
1998,
Pubmed
Nishimura,
Interaction of synaptic scaffolding molecule and Beta -catenin.
2002,
Pubmed
O'Rourke,
Dynamic changes in optic fiber terminal arbors lead to retinotopic map formation: an in vivo confocal microscopic study.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Perego,
Mammalian LIN-7 PDZ proteins associate with beta-catenin at the cell-cell junctions of epithelia and neurons.
2000,
Pubmed
Pinches,
Distribution of synaptic vesicle proteins within single retinotectal axons of Xenopus tadpoles.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pokutta,
The cytoplasmic face of cell contact sites.
2002,
Pubmed
Riehl,
Cadherin function is required for axon outgrowth in retinal ganglion cells in vivo.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sakaguchi,
Map formation in the developing Xenopus retinotectal system: an examination of ganglion cell terminal arborizations.
1985,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Schneider,
Protein evolution: structure-function relationships of the oncogene beta-catenin in the evolution of multicellular animals.
2003,
Pubmed
Sehgal,
Antagonism of cell adhesion by an alpha-catenin mutant, and of the Wnt-signaling pathway by alpha-catenin in Xenopus embryos.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Takemaru,
The transcriptional coactivator CBP interacts with beta-catenin to activate gene expression.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tang,
A role for the cadherin family of cell adhesion molecules in hippocampal long-term potentiation.
1998,
Pubmed
Togashi,
Cadherin regulates dendritic spine morphogenesis.
2002,
Pubmed
Uchida,
The catenin/cadherin adhesion system is localized in synaptic junctions bordering transmitter release zones.
1996,
Pubmed
Wang,
Biochemical purification of a mammalian slit protein as a positive regulator of sensory axon elongation and branching.
1999,
Pubmed
Yates,
Topographic-specific axon branching controlled by ephrin-As is the critical event in retinotectal map development.
2001,
Pubmed
Zou,
Expression of constitutively active CaMKII in target tissue modifies presynaptic axon arbor growth.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zou,
Postsynaptic calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is required to limit elaboration of presynaptic and postsynaptic neuronal arbors.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase