Fonseca BF et al. (2015), Derricin and derricidin inhibit Wnt/β-catenin s...

XB-ART-50235

PLoS One 2015 Mar 16;103:e0120919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120919.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Derricin and derricidin inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling and suppress colon cancer cell growth in vitro.

Fonseca BF , Predes D , Cerqueira DM , Reis AH , Amado NG , Cayres MC , Kuster RM , Oliveira FL , Mendes FA , Abreu JG .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Overactivation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in adult tissues has been implicated in many diseases, such as colorectal cancer. Finding chemical substances that can prevent this phenomenon is an emerging problem. Recently, several natural compounds have been described as Wnt/β-catenin inhibitors and might be promising agents for the control of carcinogenesis. Here, we describe two natural substances, derricin and derricidin, belonging to the chalcone subclass, that show potent transcriptional inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Both chalcones are able to affect the cell distribution of β-catenin, and inhibit Wnt-specific reporter activity in HCT116 cells and in Xenopus embryos. Derricin and derricidin also strongly inhibited canonical Wnt activity in vitro, and rescued the Wnt-induced double axis phenotype in Xenopus embryos. As a consequence of Wnt/β-catenin inhibition, derricin and derricidin treatments reduce cell viability and lead to cell cycle arrest in colorectal cancer cell lines. Taken together, our results strongly support these chalcones as novel negative modulators of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and colon cancer cell growth in vitro.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 25775405
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC4361740
???displayArticle.link??? PLoS One

Species referenced: Xenopus
Genes referenced: ctnnb1 wnt8a
GO keywords: chalcone biosynthetic process [+]

???displayArticle.disOnts??? colon cancer [+]
???displayArticle.omims??? COLORECTAL CANCER; CRC
Phenotypes: Xla Wt + wnt8a (Fig.7.B)

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

	Fig 7. Derricin and derricidin inhibit double axis formation in Xenopus embryos and suppress Wnt/Î²-catenin luciferase reporter activity in vivo.
	Fig 2. Derricin and derricidin reduce cell number and cell viability of colon cells.(A, B, D, E, G, H) Graphs show MTT absorbance levels in HCT116, DLD-1 and IEC-18 cell lines, after treatment up to 72 h with 10â100 Î¼M of derricin or derricidin. (A) In HCT116 cells, it is observed significant reduction in cell viability after 100 Î¼M of derricin for 24 h and 20 Î¼M of derricin for 48 h (B) After derricidin treatment, reduction of cell viability occurred at 100 Î¼M of derricidin after 24 h and at 30 Î¼M after 72 h. (D) In DLD-1 cells, it is observed a milder effect at 100 Î¼M after 18h of treatment. Otherwise, an intense reduction of MTT absorbance is detected after 48h treatment with 100 Î¼M of derricin. (E) Derricidin treatment significantly reduces DLD-1 cell viability after 18h treatment with 50 Î¼M of flavonoid and at 20 Î¼M after 72h. (G) In IEC-18 cells, reduction of viability is observed with 100 Î¼M of derricin, starting at 18h of treatment. (H) A similar profile is observed after derricidin treatment. (C,F,I) DAPI-stained nuclei were counted after 24h treatment with derricin and derricidin. (C) 30 and 50Î¼M of derricin reduced approximately 30% and 58% the number of HCT116 nuclei, respectively; while derricidin reduced approximately 39% and 65%, respectively. (F) DLD-1 nuclei were decreased about 44% and 50% after derricin treatment at 30 and 50 Î¼M concentrations, respectively. Derricidin treatment diminished about 50% and 70%, respectively. (I) IEC-18 nuclei were also decreased, with values of 25% and 32% of reduction with 30 and 50Î¼M of derricin, respectively, and 40% and 38% with 30 and 50Î¼M of derricidin, respectively. * p<0.05, p<0.01, *p<0.001.
	Fig 3. Derricin and derricidin inhibit cell proliferation of HCT116, DLD-1 and IEC-18 cells.Edu incorporation in colon cells after treatment with 30 and 50Î¼M of derricin and derricidin for 24h. (A,Aâ,B,Bâ,C,Câ) In control conditions, it is observed a considerable number of Edu-positive cells. (D,Dâ,E,Eâ,F,Fâ,G,Gâ,H,Hâ,I,Iâ) After treatment with derricin, it is observed a lower number of Edu-positive cells. (J,Jâ,K,Kâ,L,Lâ,M,Mâ,N,Nâ,O,Oâ) Derricidin treatment also reduces Edu-positive cells. (P,Q,R) Quantification of Edu-positive cells in HCT116, DLD-1 and IEC-18. Scale bar 50 Î¼m, p<0.01, *p<0.001.
	Fig 4. Derricin and derricidin induced cell cycle arrest in CRC cells.(A, D, E) In HCT116, untreated cells showed approximately 75% of cells in G1/G0 phase, while 30 and 50 Î¼M of derricin reduced this proportion to 67.6% and 54%, respectively, resulting in cell cycle arrest in S and G2/M phases, respectively. Derricidin reduced this proportion to 53.8% and 35.5%, respectively and also induced cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase. (B, F,G) On the other hand, DLD-1 cells accumulated in G0/G1 phase of cell cycle after 30 Î¼M and 50 Î¼M of derricin or derricidin. (C, H, I) Derricin and derricidin treatment had milder effects in cell cycle progression of IEC-18 cells, except for a slightly arrest at G2/M with 50 Î¼M of derricin. Bar graphs represent the percentage of cells according treatment and significant data were represented in the figure. Black bars: G0/G1 phase; White bars: S phase; and Gray bars: G2/M phases.
	Fig 5. Derricin and derricidin affect Î²-catenin cell localization and Wnt reporter activity in HCT116 cells.(A-I) Î²-catenin immunostaining of HCT116 cells treated with 30 Î¼M of each chalcone for 24 h. (A-C) In control conditions, majority of cells show Î²-catenin staining of nucleus. (D-F) After treatment with derricin, this staining is lost and most cells show Î²-catenin in cytoplasm and membrane. (G-I) Derricidin treatment also reduces nuclear staining of Î²-catenin. (J) Quantification of immunostaining showed that both chalcones reduce nuclear Î²-catenin. (K) Wnt/Î²â€“catenin specific reporter assay of TOPFlash/Renilla transfected HCT116 cells. Both chalcones reduce Wnt reporter activity after 30 and 50 Î¼M treatment for 24 h. Scale bar: 50 Î¼M, p<0.05,p<0.01, **p<0.001.
	Fig 6. Derricin and derricidin inhibit Wnt-reporter activity in RKO-pBAR/Renilla and HEK293t.(A,C) Derricin inhibits Wnt-reporter activity starting at 10 Î¼M in luciferase assays of RKO-pBAR/Renilla and of HEK293t. (B,D) Derricidin slightly inhibits Wnt-reporter activity at 20 Î¼M in RKO-pBAR/Renilla and HEK293t. In RKO-pBAR/Renilla, higher inhibition is achieved at 50 Î¼M of derricidin (B). (A,B) 10, 20, 50 Î¼M of each chalcone. (C,D) 10, 20, 30 Î¼M of each chalcone. (E) HEK293T activation of Wnt signaling through transfection of Î²-catenin is suppressed upon derricin treatment, but not derricidin. p<0.05, p<0.01, **p<0.001.
	Fig 1. Chemical structures of the chalcones derricin (A) and derricidin (B).

References [+] :

Amado, Flavonoids: potential Wnt/beta-catenin signaling modulators in cancer. 2011, Pubmed, Xenbase

	Fig 7. Derricin and derricidin inhibit double axis formation in Xenopus embryos and suppress Wnt/Î²-catenin luciferase reporter activity in vivo.
	Fig 2. Derricin and derricidin reduce cell number and cell viability of colon cells.(A, B, D, E, G, H) Graphs show MTT absorbance levels in HCT116, DLD-1 and IEC-18 cell lines, after treatment up to 72 h with 10â100 Î¼M of derricin or derricidin. (A) In HCT116 cells, it is observed significant reduction in cell viability after 100 Î¼M of derricin for 24 h and 20 Î¼M of derricin for 48 h (B) After derricidin treatment, reduction of cell viability occurred at 100 Î¼M of derricidin after 24 h and at 30 Î¼M after 72 h. (D) In DLD-1 cells, it is observed a milder effect at 100 Î¼M after 18h of treatment. Otherwise, an intense reduction of MTT absorbance is detected after 48h treatment with 100 Î¼M of derricin. (E) Derricidin treatment significantly reduces DLD-1 cell viability after 18h treatment with 50 Î¼M of flavonoid and at 20 Î¼M after 72h. (G) In IEC-18 cells, reduction of viability is observed with 100 Î¼M of derricin, starting at 18h of treatment. (H) A similar profile is observed after derricidin treatment. (C,F,I) DAPI-stained nuclei were counted after 24h treatment with derricin and derricidin. (C) 30 and 50Î¼M of derricin reduced approximately 30% and 58% the number of HCT116 nuclei, respectively; while derricidin reduced approximately 39% and 65%, respectively. (F) DLD-1 nuclei were decreased about 44% and 50% after derricin treatment at 30 and 50 Î¼M concentrations, respectively. Derricidin treatment diminished about 50% and 70%, respectively. (I) IEC-18 nuclei were also decreased, with values of 25% and 32% of reduction with 30 and 50Î¼M of derricin, respectively, and 40% and 38% with 30 and 50Î¼M of derricidin, respectively. * p<0.05, p<0.01, *p<0.001.
	Fig 3. Derricin and derricidin inhibit cell proliferation of HCT116, DLD-1 and IEC-18 cells.Edu incorporation in colon cells after treatment with 30 and 50Î¼M of derricin and derricidin for 24h. (A,Aâ,B,Bâ,C,Câ) In control conditions, it is observed a considerable number of Edu-positive cells. (D,Dâ,E,Eâ,F,Fâ,G,Gâ,H,Hâ,I,Iâ) After treatment with derricin, it is observed a lower number of Edu-positive cells. (J,Jâ,K,Kâ,L,Lâ,M,Mâ,N,Nâ,O,Oâ) Derricidin treatment also reduces Edu-positive cells. (P,Q,R) Quantification of Edu-positive cells in HCT116, DLD-1 and IEC-18. Scale bar 50 Î¼m, p<0.01, *p<0.001.
	Fig 4. Derricin and derricidin induced cell cycle arrest in CRC cells.(A, D, E) In HCT116, untreated cells showed approximately 75% of cells in G1/G0 phase, while 30 and 50 Î¼M of derricin reduced this proportion to 67.6% and 54%, respectively, resulting in cell cycle arrest in S and G2/M phases, respectively. Derricidin reduced this proportion to 53.8% and 35.5%, respectively and also induced cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase. (B, F,G) On the other hand, DLD-1 cells accumulated in G0/G1 phase of cell cycle after 30 Î¼M and 50 Î¼M of derricin or derricidin. (C, H, I) Derricin and derricidin treatment had milder effects in cell cycle progression of IEC-18 cells, except for a slightly arrest at G2/M with 50 Î¼M of derricin. Bar graphs represent the percentage of cells according treatment and significant data were represented in the figure. Black bars: G0/G1 phase; White bars: S phase; and Gray bars: G2/M phases.
	Fig 5. Derricin and derricidin affect Î²-catenin cell localization and Wnt reporter activity in HCT116 cells.(A-I) Î²-catenin immunostaining of HCT116 cells treated with 30 Î¼M of each chalcone for 24 h. (A-C) In control conditions, majority of cells show Î²-catenin staining of nucleus. (D-F) After treatment with derricin, this staining is lost and most cells show Î²-catenin in cytoplasm and membrane. (G-I) Derricidin treatment also reduces nuclear staining of Î²-catenin. (J) Quantification of immunostaining showed that both chalcones reduce nuclear Î²-catenin. (K) Wnt/Î²â€“catenin specific reporter assay of TOPFlash/Renilla transfected HCT116 cells. Both chalcones reduce Wnt reporter activity after 30 and 50 Î¼M treatment for 24 h. Scale bar: 50 Î¼M, p<0.05,p<0.01, **p<0.001.
	Fig 6. Derricin and derricidin inhibit Wnt-reporter activity in RKO-pBAR/Renilla and HEK293t.(A,C) Derricin inhibits Wnt-reporter activity starting at 10 Î¼M in luciferase assays of RKO-pBAR/Renilla and of HEK293t. (B,D) Derricidin slightly inhibits Wnt-reporter activity at 20 Î¼M in RKO-pBAR/Renilla and HEK293t. In RKO-pBAR/Renilla, higher inhibition is achieved at 50 Î¼M of derricidin (B). (A,B) 10, 20, 50 Î¼M of each chalcone. (C,D) 10, 20, 30 Î¼M of each chalcone. (E) HEK293T activation of Wnt signaling through transfection of Î²-catenin is suppressed upon derricin treatment, but not derricidin. p<0.05, p<0.01, **p<0.001.
	Fig 1. Chemical structures of the chalcones derricin (A) and derricidin (B).