Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Neural Dev
2016 Aug 08;111:14. doi: 10.1186/s13064-016-0069-7.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Fragile X mental retardation protein knockdown in the developing Xenopus tadpoleoptic tectum results in enhanced feedforward inhibition and behavioral deficits.
???displayArticle.abstract???
BACKGROUND: Fragile X Syndrome is the leading monogenetic cause of autism and most common form of intellectual disability. Previous studies have implicated changes in dendritic spine architecture as the primary result of loss of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP), but recent work has shown that neural proliferation is decreased and cell death is increased with either loss of FMRP or overexpression of FMRP. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of loss of FMRP on behavior and cellular activity.
METHODS: We knocked down FMRP expression using morpholino oligos in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles and performed a series of behavioral and electrophysiological assays. We investigated visually guided collision avoidance, schooling, and seizure propensity. Using single cell electrophysiology, we assessed intrinsic excitability and synaptic connectivity of tectal neurons.
RESULTS: We found that FMRP knockdown results in decreased swimming speed, reduced schooling behavior and decreased seizure severity. In single cells, we found increased inhibition relative to excitation in response to sensory input.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the electrophysiological development of single cells in the absence of FMRP is largely unaffected despite the large neural proliferation defect. The changes in behavior are consistent with an increase in inhibition, which could be due to either changes in cell number or altered inhibitory drive, and indicate that FMRP can play a significant role in neural development much earlier than previously thought.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
27503008
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC4977860 ???displayArticle.link???Neural Dev ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Fig. 1. Background swimming speeds, schooling behavior and seizure severity are affected by FMRP KD. a Background swimming is decreased in FMRP KD tadpoles (Ptâ<â0.05). bâc Visual avoidance behavior is unaffected. Collision-escape velocity (b, the velocity of the tadpole after collision with virtual object) and escape distance (c, the distance between the tadpole and the virtual object when the tadpole initiates avoidance response) are unaffected (Ptâ>â0.05 for controls and FMRP KD tadpoles in b, c). dâe FMRP KD tadpoles show reduced schooling. d FMRP KD tadpoles have fewer long and short distances and more medium distances between neighboring tadpoles, indicating more dispersed swimming and decreased aggregation (P
KSâ<â0.05). e Control tadpoles have a higher frequency of less than 90° angles for co-orientation whereas FMRP KD tadpoles have no preference for alignment (P
KSâ<â10â20), inset. Diagram explaining schooling behavior, with small clusters of tadpoles with more short (inter-cluster) and long (intra-cluster) distances in controls, and more medium distances in FMRP KD tadpoles. Tadpoles are also co oriented with their nearest neighbor. fâh FMRP KD tadpoles seize significantly less frequently and for longer than controls, indicating decreased seizure susceptibility. f FMRP KD tadpoles seize with significantly reduced frequency compared to control MO tadpoles (P
tâ<â0.01), g FMRP KD tadpoles have significantly longer seizures (P
tâ<â0.005), h Seizure length plotted against seizure frequency indicates a negative correlation between the two, and separation between experimental groups
Fig. 2. Intrinsic properties of tectal neurons are similar between control and FMRP KD tadpoles. a Example traces showing voltage gated inward and outward currents evoked by a series of depolarizing pulses. Voltage steps, 0â90Â mV in 10Â mV increments, were presented for 150Â ms while current was measured, from a holding potential of â60Â mV. b Currentâvoltage relationship of inward sodium (Na) and outward potassium (K) voltage-gated currents. Dotted lines are the K current, solid lines are Na current. c Example spiking traces. Current steps, 10-200pA in 10pA increments were presented for 150Â ms while voltage was measured. Voltage injections of 40pA and 180pA shown. d Current vs. spiking relationship. nâ=â29 per group, At 10pA injection, pâ=â0.002 and at 20pA injection, pâ=â0.002 (multiple t-tests by current step, Sidak-Bonferroni multiple comparisons correction). e Maximum number of spikes at a given current injection. nâ=â29 per group, PMW =0.8376
Fig. 3. Spontaneous synaptic activity in tectal neurons is similar between control and FMRP KD tadpoles. a Example spontaneous EPSCs recorded at -60Â mV in the presence of GABAA receptor blocker, picrotoxin. b Example spontaneous IPSCs recorded at +5Â mV, the reversal potential for excitatory currents. c Frequency of sEPSCs. nâ=â28 for each group, PMWâ=â0.6784. d Amplitude of sEPSCs. nâ=â28 for each group, PMW =0.1069. e Frequency of sIPSCs. nâ=â18 control, nâ=â27 FMRP KD, PMW =0.1789. f Amplitude of sIPSCs. nâ=â18 control, nâ=â27 FMRP KD, PMW =0.5740. g Excitatory recurrent activity, defined as the presence of a barrage of activity at least 200Â ms in duration with a change in holding current of at least 10pA. nâ=â28 for each group, PMW =0.3136. h Inhibitory recurrent activity, defined as the presence of a barrage of activity at least 200Â ms in duration with a change in holding current of at least 10pA. nâ=â18 control, nâ=â27 FMRP KD, PMW =0.5101
Fig. 4. Excitatory evoked activity is not different in FMRP KD tadpoles. a Example traces of excitatory evoked activity, used to calculate the AMPA:NMDA ratio (top, control, average of 24 traces (â65Â mV) and 15 traces (+55Â mV)); bottom, FMRP KD, average of 19 traces (â65Â mV) and 23 traces (+55Â mV)). b The AMPA:NMDA ratio quantifies the size of the response at -65Â mV and at +55Â mV and is not different between groups. nâ=â14 (control), nâ=â9 (FMRP KD), Ptâ=â0.77. c Example traces of paired pulse facilitation (single paired stimuli) collected at a holding potential of â60Â mV. d The ratio of the second pulse to the first pulse in a paired pulse protocol shows the level of facilitation at the synapse. nâ=â9 (control), nâ=â12 (FMRP KD), Pt =0.82. e Example traces of recurrent activity (single stimulation). f Recurrent activity quantified over two timeframes. 0-50Â ms is primarily driven by the monosynaptic visual afferents while 0-300Â ms primarily measures the polysynaptic activity evoked by local tectal networks. nâ=â18 (control), nâ=â16 (FMRP KD), PMW =0.84 (0-50Â ms), PMW =0.91 (0-300Â ms). g Monosynapticity, the ratio of the monosynpatic response (0-50Â ms) to the polysynaptic response (100-200Â ms). nâ=â18 (control), nâ=â15 (FMRP KD), PMW =0.44
Fig. 5. FMRP KD tadpole cells show increased evoked inhibitory activity. a Example traces of inhibitory evoked activity (recorded at +5 mv), and excitatory (recorded at â45 mv) used to calculate the excitation-inhibition balance (top, control; bottom, FMRP KD). b Evoked inhibitory recurrent activity at +5Â mV, PMWâ=â0.048, nâ=â11 (control), nâ=â17 (FMRP KD). c Evoked excitatory recurrent activity at -45Â mV, nâ=â11 (control), nâ=â17 (FMRP KD). d Excitation to inhibition ratio, Ptâ=â0.009, nâ=â11 (control), nâ=â17 (FMRP KD). e Average charge of inhibitory responses calculated over bins of 100Â msec following stimulus show altered time course of inhibitory responses in FMRP KD group
Aizenman,
Enhanced visual activity in vivo forms nascent synapses in the developing retinotectal projection.
2007, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Aizenman,
Enhanced visual activity in vivo forms nascent synapses in the developing retinotectal projection.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Aizenman,
Visually driven regulation of intrinsic neuronal excitability improves stimulus detection in vivo.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Akerman,
Depolarizing GABAergic conductances regulate the balance of excitation to inhibition in the developing retinotectal circuit in vivo.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bell,
A neuroprotective role for polyamines in a Xenopus tadpole model of epilepsy.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Belmonte,
Autism as a disorder of neural information processing: directions for research and targets for therapy.
2004,
Pubmed
Bhakar,
The pathophysiology of fragile X (and what it teaches us about synapses).
2012,
Pubmed
Brainard,
The Psychophysics Toolbox.
1997,
Pubmed
Cea-Del Rio,
The contribution of inhibitory interneurons to circuit dysfunction in Fragile X Syndrome.
2014,
Pubmed
Ciarleglio,
Multivariate analysis of electrophysiological diversity of Xenopus visual neurons during development and plasticity.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Clements,
Detection of spontaneous synaptic events with an optimally scaled template.
1997,
Pubmed
Dani,
Reduced cortical activity due to a shift in the balance between excitation and inhibition in a mouse model of Rett syndrome.
2005,
Pubmed
Di Cristo,
Development of cortical GABAergic circuits and its implications for neurodevelopmental disorders.
2007,
Pubmed
Faulkner,
FMRP regulates neurogenesis in vivo in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fenton,
Excitation-inhibition discoordination in rodent models of mental disorders.
2015,
Pubmed
Fu,
Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.
1991,
Pubmed
Gessert,
FMR1/FXR1 and the miRNA pathway are required for eye and neural crest development.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gibson,
Imbalance of neocortical excitation and inhibition and altered UP states reflect network hyperexcitability in the mouse model of fragile X syndrome.
2008,
Pubmed
Hagerman,
Origins of epilepsy in fragile X syndrome.
2009,
Pubmed
Hamodi,
The horizontal brain slice preparation: a novel approach for visualizing and recording from all layers of the tadpole tectum.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
He,
The trouble with spines in fragile X syndrome: density, maturity and plasticity.
2013,
Pubmed
Irwin,
Dendritic spine structural anomalies in fragile-X mental retardation syndrome.
2000,
Pubmed
James,
Valproate-induced neurodevelopmental deficits in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Khakhalin,
GABAergic transmission and chloride equilibrium potential are not modulated by pyruvate in the developing optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lewis,
Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia.
2005,
Pubmed
Li,
Concise review: Fragile X proteins in stem cell maintenance and differentiation.
2014,
Pubmed
Lim,
Developmental expression of Xenopus fragile X mental retardation-1 gene.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Liu,
A population of gap junction-coupled neurons drives recurrent network activity in a developing visual circuit.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Martin,
Deficient tonic GABAergic conductance and synaptic balance in the fragile X syndrome amygdala.
2014,
Pubmed
Paluszkiewicz,
Fragile X syndrome: the GABAergic system and circuit dysfunction.
2011,
Pubmed
Pratt,
Modeling human neurodevelopmental disorders in the Xenopus tadpole: from mechanisms to therapeutic targets.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pratt,
Homeostatic regulation of intrinsic excitability and synaptic transmission in a developing visual circuit.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pratt,
Development and spike timing-dependent plasticity of recurrent excitation in the Xenopus optic tectum.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Rice,
Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models.
2000,
Pubmed
Santoro,
Molecular mechanisms of fragile X syndrome: a twenty-year perspective.
2012,
Pubmed
Verkerk,
Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome.
1991,
Pubmed
Vislay,
Homeostatic responses fail to correct defective amygdala inhibitory circuit maturation in fragile X syndrome.
2013,
Pubmed
Wassersug,
Tadpole behaviour: aggregation in larval Xenopus laevis.
1971,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Waung,
Protein translation in synaptic plasticity: mGluR-LTD, Fragile X.
2009,
Pubmed
Wijetunge,
Fragile X syndrome: from targets to treatments.
2013,
Pubmed
Wu,
Maturation of a central glutamatergic synapse.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wu,
Infection of frog neurons with vaccinia virus permits in vivo expression of foreign proteins.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Xu,
Visual experience-dependent maturation of correlated neuronal activity patterns in a developing visual system.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase