Wu HY , Zhou YM , Liao ZQ , Zhong JW , Liu YB , Zhao H , Liang CQ , Huang RJ , Park KS , Feng SS , Zheng L , Cai DQ , Qi XF .

2014A030306011, 2014A050503043 and 87315007 Guangdong Science and Technology Department (Science and Technology Department, Guangdong Province), 21617436, JNSBYC-2016059, ZSYX-M-2019-00009 and ZSYXM202004 Jinan University (JNU), 2014J2200002 Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project, 82070257, 81770240, 81570222, and 81270183 National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China), 31802025 National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China), 91649203 National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China), 2016YFE0204700 and 2017YFA0103302 Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology)

             cell proliferation involved in heart morphogenesis

Xtr Wt + heart injury (Fig. 1 d)
Xtr Wt + heart injury (Fig 1d)
Xtr Wt + heart injury (Fig. 2 a-i)
Xtr Wt + heart injury (Fig. 2 a-i)
Xtr Wt + heart injury (Fig.3 )
Xtr Wt + heart injury (Fig. 4.jklm)
Xtr Wt + heart injury (Fig. 5 b)
Xtr Wt + heart injury (Fig. 5 g)

	Fig. 2. Surgical injury induces X. tropicalis heart regeneration through cardiomyocyte proliferation.a, b Representative Z-stack confocal images of pH3+ cardiomyocytes (arrow) at 3 (a) and 7 (b) dpr. c Quantification of pH3+ cardiomyocytes during heart regeneration within 60 days. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4 each), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus sham (one-way ANOVA plus Dunnett’s test). d, e Representative Z-stack confocal images of EdU+ cardiomyocytes (arrow) at 3 (d) and 7 (e) dpr. f Quantification of EdU+ cardiomyocytes during heart regeneration within 60 days. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4 each), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus sham (one-way ANOVA plus Dunnett’s test). g–i Representative confocal (g) and Z-stack (h) images of PCNA+ cardiomyocytes (arrow) at 7 dpr with the quantification (i). Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4 each), **p < 0.01 versus sham (Student’s t test).
	Fig. 3. Proliferation of cardiomyocytes contribute to the regenerated ventricle apex in X. tropicalis.a Schematic of EdU pulse-chase experiment designed to label proliferating CMs during regeneration. b–d Representative images (b) and quantification (c) of EdU+ cardiomyocytes in the ventricle apex following EdU injection at 30 dpr revealing a great contribution of the pre-existing cardiomyocytes proliferation to apex regeneration. Green indicates EdU; red, α-actinin; blue, nuclei. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 4 for sham and 8 for 30 dpr pulse), ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t test). Representative Z-stack confocal images of EdU+ cardiomyocytes are shown (d). e, f Combination of representative confocal images at high magnification showing substantial EdU+ cardiomyocytes in the regenerated ventricle apex (e) but not in the remote zone (f).
	Fig. 4. RNA-seq analysis for sham-operated and resected ventricles of X. tropicalis.a Statistic of differentially expressed genes in resected ventricles compared to control. b, c Overall changes of genes in resected ventricles at 0.5 dpr (b) and 1 dpr (c) compared to controls. d, e GO analysis of differentially expressed genes in ventricles at 0.5 dpr (d, 499 plus 111 genes) and 1 dpr (e, 338 plus 30 genes) over controls. f Overall change of genes in resected ventricles at 60 dpr compared to 0.5 dpr. g Upregulated genes in 0.5 dpr compared with control (499) overlaid with downregulated genes in 60 dpr compared with 0.5 dpr (534). h, i GSEA analysis of heart with apical resection at 0.5 dpr showing high correlations with cell cycle (h) and proliferation (i) gene sets. j–m Expression of selected genes relative to cyclin (j), cyclin-dependent kinase (k), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (l), and checkpoint kinase (m) was analyzed by using the FPKM levels from RNA-seq. All results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus control (Student’s t test).
	Fig. 5. Fosl1 interacts with JunB and promotes ccnt1 expression during heart regeneration in X. tropicalis.a Heat map of log2(FC) values showing genes differentially expressed in the hearts at 0.5, 1, 7, 14, 30, and 60 dpr compared with sham. b The qPCR of some selected regulators for cell cycle progression in sham and 0.5 dpr hearts (n = 4 each). c GSEA analysis of hearts at 0.5 dpr showing high correlations with Fosl1 (left) and JunB (right) pathways. d Expression of Flag-tagged xFosl1 (left) and HA-tagged xJunB (right) in X. tropicalis embryos was confirmed by western blotting. e CoIP assay showing the interaction between xFosl1-Flag and xJunB-HA in X. tropicalis embryos. f CoIP analysis showing the increased interaction between Fosl1 and JunB in regenerating neonatal mouse heart compared with the quiescent heart. g qPCR validation of cell cycle regulators with significant upregulation in RNA-seq analysis (n = 4 each). h Promoters of the cell cycle regulators with more than twofold upregulation were subjected to luciferase activity assay, using reporter plasmids and mutants (n = 5 each). i GSEA analysis of the hearts at 0.5 dpr showing high correlations with Ccnt1 pathway. j Representative image of ChIP assay confirmed the in vivo interaction of Fosl1 with promoters of ccnt1 in X. tropicalis embryos. k ChIP-qPCR analysis showing the increased interaction between Fosl1 protein and Ccnt1 promoter region in regenerating neonatal mouse heart compared with quiescent heart. l, m qPCR validation of Fosl1 (l) and JunB (m) in sham and resected hearts of neonatal mice (n = 4 each). All data are presented as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus control (Student’s t test).
	Fig. 6. Fosl1 is critical to the proliferation of H9c2 cells.a–d H9c2 cells were transfected with pLOX-xFosl1 or pLOX-NC for 48 h, followed by qPCR validation of X. tropicalis Fosl1 (xFosl1) expression (a, n = 3 each), cell counting assay (b, n = 6 each), and nuclear EdU incorporation assay, respectively. Representative images (c) and quantification (d) of EdU+ cells are shown (n = ~30 fields from 5 wells per group). e–i Endogenous rat Fosl1 (rFosl1) expression in H9c2 cells was silenced using siRNA for 48 h, followed by qPCR validation (e), cell counting assay (f), and EdU incorporation assay. Representative images (g) and quantification (h) of EdU+ cells as well as quantification of total cells (i) are shown (n = ~60 fields from 10 wells per group). j–l Stable Fosl1 knockdown H9c2 cell line was established using LentiCRISPRv2 system. Cell counting assay (j, n = 6–7 each), representative images (k), and quantification (l) of EdU+ cells are shown (n = ~30 fields from 5 wells per group). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t test).
	Fig. 7. Fosl1 is required for the proliferation of primary cardiomyocytes.a, b Primary cardiomyocytes were transfected with siFosl1 and siNC for 48 h, followed by Ki67 (red) and cTnT (green) double staining. Representative images (a) and quantification (b) of Ki67+ cardiomyocytes are shown (n = ~60 fields from at least 5 wells per group). Representative Z-stack confocal images of Ki67+ cardiomyocytes are shown in right panel of a. c, d Proliferation of primary cardiomyocytes were examined using pH3 (red) and cTnT (green) double staining. Representative images (c) and quantification (d) of pH3+ cardiomyocytes are shown (n = ~30 fields from at least 5 wells per group). Representative Z-stack confocal images of pH3+ cardiomyocytes are shown in right panel of c. e, f Proliferation of primary cardiomyocytes were examined using nuclear EdU (red) incorporation assay. Representative images (e) and quantification (f) of EdU+ cardiomyocytes are shown (n = ~60 fields from at least 5 wells per group). Representative Z-stack confocal images of EdU+ cardiomyocytes are shown in right panel of e. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t test).
	Fig. 8. Fosl1 function is required for cardiomyocyte proliferation during X. tropicalis heart regeneration.a Schematic of heart injury and sample collection in adult X. tropicalis. b Whole images of hearts isolated from wild-type (WT) and Tg(Mlc2-dnFosl1-T2A-EGFP) line at 3 dpr. c Validation of EGFP expression in the ventricular section from the dnFosl1 heart. d, e Representative images (d) and quantification (e) of EdU+ cardiomyocytes in the ventricle apex following EdU injection at 3 dpr (n = 5 hearts per group). Right panel of d is the magnified confocal images of EdU+ cardiomyocytes. f, g Representative images (f) and quantification (g) of pH3+ cardiomyocytes are shown in the ventricle apex (n = 5 hearts per group). Magnified representative confocal images of pH3+ cardiomyocytes are shown in right panel of f. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus WT (Student’s t test).
	Fig. 9. Fosl1 silencing inhibits cardiomyocyte proliferation during heart regeneration in neonatal mouse.a Schematic of AAV9-shFosl1 virus injection to silence Fosl1 in the quiescent neonatal heart. b qPCR validation of Fosl1 knockdown in the neonatal heart after AAV9-shFosl1 injection (n = 5 hearts). c, d Representative images (c) and quantification (d) of EdU+ cardiomyocytes in ventricle apex (n = 8 hearts). Lower panels of c are the magnified confocal images of EdU+ cardiomyocytes. e Representative images and quantification of pH3+ cardiomyocytes in the ventricle apex (n = 8 hearts). Lower panels are the magnified images of pH3+ cardiomyocytes. f Schematic of AAV9-shFosl1 virus injection to silence Fosl1 in the injured heart at 4 dpr. g qPCR validation of Fosl1 knockdown in the injured heart (n = 3 hearts). h Quantification of heart weight (HW) to body weight (BW) ratio (n = 3 hearts). i, j Representative images (i) and quantification (j) of EdU+ cardiomyocytes in the ventricle apex (n = 8 and 5 hearts). Right panels of i are the magnified images of EdU+ cardiomyocytes. k, l Representative images (k) and quantification (l) of Ki67+ cardiomyocytes in the ventricle apex (n = 8 and 5 hearts). Right panels of k are the magnified images of Ki67+ cardiomyocytes. m, n Representative images (m) and quantification (n) of pH3+ cardiomyocytes in the ventricle apex (n = 8 and 5 hearts). Right panels of m are the magnified images of pH3+ cardiomyocytes. All data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus shNC (Student’s t test).
	Fig. 10. Fosl1 overexpression improves cardiac function in adult mouse upon myocardium infarction.a qPCR validation of Fosl1 expression in the infarcted heart at 0–3 days post-MI (dpM). b Schematic of AAV9-Fosl1 virus injection to overexpress Fosl1 in the infarcted heart. c Representative images of EGFP expression in the heart 30 days post AAV9-Fosl1 injection. d qPCR validation of Fosl1 knockdown in the heart 30 days post AAV9-Fosl1 injection (n = 3 hearts). e Quantification of HW to BW ratio at 7 dpM (n = 7 hearts). f, g Representative images of M-model echocardiography (f) and quantification of LVEF (g, left) and LVFS (g, right) at 7 dpM are shown (n = 11 hearts). h, i Representative images (h) and quantification (i) of scar size at 7 dpM (n = 5 hearts). j, k Representative images (j) and quantification (k) of Ki67+ cardiomyocytes at 7 dpM (n = 5 hearts). Right upper panels of j are the magnified images of Ki67+ cardiomyocytes. l, m Representative images (l) and quantification (m) of pH3+ cardiomyocytes at 7 dpM (n = 5 hearts). Right upper panels of l are the magnified image of pH3+ cardiomyocytes. n Quantification of HW to BW ratio at 28 dpM (n = 7 hearts). o, p Representative images of M-model echocardiography (o) and quantification of LVEF (p, left) and LVFS (p, right) at 28 dpM are shown (n = 10 hearts). q, r Representative images (q) and quantification (r) of scar size at 28 dpM (n = 5 hearts). All data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus control (Student’s t test).

Arrell, Cardiopoietic stem cell therapy restores infarction-altered cardiac proteome. 2020, Pubmed

Arrell, Cardiopoietic stem cell therapy restores infarction-altered cardiac proteome. 2020, Pubmed
Becker, Regeneration of the ventricular myocardium in amphibians. 1974, Pubmed
Beisaw, AP-1 Contributes to Chromatin Accessibility to Promote Sarcomere Disassembly and Cardiomyocyte Protrusion During Zebrafish Heart Regeneration. 2020, Pubmed
Bergmann, Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. 2009, Pubmed
Bise, Ciliary neurotrophic factor stimulates cardioprotection and the proliferative activity in the adult zebrafish heart. 2019, Pubmed
Bui, Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure. 2011, Pubmed
Cao, Explant culture of adult zebrafish hearts for epicardial regeneration studies. 2016, Pubmed
Chang, Forkhead box O3 protects the heart against paraquat-induced aging-associated phenotypes by upregulating the expression of antioxidant enzymes. 2019, Pubmed
Chong, Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. 2014, Pubmed
Deuchar, Regeneration of the tail bud in Xenopus embryos. 1975, Pubmed , Xenbase
Edwards-Faret, Spinal cord regeneration in Xenopus laevis. 2017, Pubmed , Xenbase
Eisen, Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. 1998, Pubmed
Elangovan, FOSL1 Promotes Kras-induced Lung Cancer through Amphiregulin and Cell Survival Gene Regulation. 2018, Pubmed
Frantz, Sustained activation of nuclear factor kappa B and activator protein 1 in chronic heart failure. 2003, Pubmed
FREEMAN, LENS REGENERATION FROM THE CORNEA IN XENOPUS LAEVIS. 1963, Pubmed , Xenbase
Gamba, Cardiac regeneration in model organisms. 2014, Pubmed
Garbern, Cardiac stem cell therapy and the promise of heart regeneration. 2013, Pubmed
Grammer, Identification of mutants in inbred Xenopus tropicalis. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Guo, Developmental expression patterns of fosl genes in Xenopus tropicalis. 2019, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hsieh, Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury. 2007, Pubmed
Jochum, Increased bone formation and osteosclerosis in mice overexpressing the transcription factor Fra-1. 2000, Pubmed
Jopling, Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. 2010, Pubmed
Khan, JASPAR 2018: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles and its web framework. 2018, Pubmed
Kikuchi, Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4(+) cardiomyocytes. 2010, Pubmed
Kim, HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. 2015, Pubmed
Kretzschmar, Profiling proliferative cells and their progeny in damaged murine hearts. 2018, Pubmed
Kubota, Dynamic Regulation of AP-1 Transcriptional Complexes Directs Trophoblast Differentiation. 2015, Pubmed
Lee, Fosl1 overexpression directly activates trophoblast-specific gene expression programs in embryonic stem cells. 2018, Pubmed
Li, RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. 2011, Pubmed
Liao, Heart regeneration in adult Xenopus tropicalis after apical resection. 2017, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lin, Strategies for cardiac regeneration and repair. 2014, Pubmed
Litviňuková, Cells of the adult human heart. 2020, Pubmed
Mahmoud, Meis1 regulates postnatal cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest. 2013, Pubmed
Marshall, Stage-dependent cardiac regeneration in Xenopus is regulated by thyroid hormone availability. 2019, Pubmed , Xenbase
Marshall, Persistent fibrosis, hypertrophy and sarcomere disorganisation after endoscopy-guided heart resection in adult Xenopus. 2017, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mechta, Transformation by ras modifies AP1 composition and activity. 1997, Pubmed
Mollova, Cardiomyocyte proliferation contributes to heart growth in young humans. 2013, Pubmed
Mootha, PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. 2003, Pubmed
Nakada, Hypoxia induces heart regeneration in adult mice. 2017, Pubmed
Narula, Apoptosis in myocytes in end-stage heart failure. 1996, Pubmed
Oberpriller, Response of the adult newt ventricle to injury. 1974, Pubmed
Olive, A dominant negative to activation protein-1 (AP1) that abolishes DNA binding and inhibits oncogenesis. 1997, Pubmed
OVERTON, PATTERNS OF LIMB REGENERATION IN XENOPUS LAEVIS. 1963, Pubmed , Xenbase
Porrello, Regulation of neonatal and adult mammalian heart regeneration by the miR-15 family. 2013, Pubmed
Porrello, Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. 2011, Pubmed
Poss, Heart regeneration in zebrafish. 2002, Pubmed
Renaud, The FOS transcription factor family differentially controls trophoblast migration and invasion. 2014, Pubmed
Sahara, Programming and reprogramming a human heart cell. 2015, Pubmed
Sander, Isolation and in vitro culture of primary cardiomyocytes from adult zebrafish hearts. 2013, Pubmed
Sanjana, Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. 2014, Pubmed
Senyo, Cardiac regeneration based on mechanisms of cardiomyocyte proliferation and differentiation. 2014, Pubmed
Shaulian, AP-1 in cell proliferation and survival. 2001, Pubmed
Shaulian, AP-1 as a regulator of cell life and death. 2002, Pubmed
Shimizu, Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and activator protein-1 in myocardial infarction in rats. 1998, Pubmed
Subramanian, Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. 2005, Pubmed
Tarazona, Differential expression in RNA-seq: a matter of depth. 2011, Pubmed
Vallejo, An integrative approach unveils FOSL1 as an oncogene vulnerability in KRAS-driven lung and pancreatic cancer. 2017, Pubmed
van Duijvenboden, Conserved NPPB+ Border Zone Switches From MEF2- to AP-1-Driven Gene Program. 2019, Pubmed
Wang, Epicardial regeneration is guided by cardiac outflow tract and Hedgehog signalling. 2015, Pubmed
Xiao, Chromatin-remodelling factor Brg1 regulates myocardial proliferation and regeneration in zebrafish. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Xin, Coordination of metabolic pathways: Enhanced carbon conservation in 1,3-propanediol production by coupling with optically pure lactate biosynthesis. 2017, Pubmed
Young, Fra-1 a target for cancer prevention or intervention. 2006, Pubmed